DoD's $24.3M Contract with Thomas Group Inc. for Management Consulting Services Awarded via Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $24,290,538 ($24.3M)
Contractor: Thomas Group, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-09-30
End Date: 2008-03-31
Contract Duration: 548 days
Daily Burn Rate: $44.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Place of Performance
Location: SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92132
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $24.3 million to THOMAS GROUP, INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Thomas Group, Inc. for administrative and general management consulting. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration was 548 days, with a total award value of $24,290,538. 4. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Navy, a component of the Department of Defense.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $24.3 million over approximately 18 months suggests a significant investment in consulting services. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money against industry benchmarks.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing and allows for a broad range of potential contractors to bid. This method aims to ensure the government receives the best value.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it promotes market competition, potentially leading to more cost-effective solutions.
Public Impact
Taxpayers funded a substantial contract for management consulting services for the Department of the Navy. The services provided likely aimed to improve administrative and general management functions within the Navy. The competitive award process suggests an effort to secure services at a reasonable price point.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics or outcomes makes value assessment challenging.
- Consulting contracts can be prone to scope creep and cost overruns if not managed tightly.
Positive Signals
- Awarded via full and open competition, indicating a competitive process.
- Contract was firm fixed price, providing cost certainty.
Sector Analysis
Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services are crucial for optimizing organizational efficiency and effectiveness. Benchmarks for such services vary widely based on scope, duration, and contractor expertise, but a $24.3M contract over 18 months indicates a substantial engagement.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses and the awardee, Thomas Group, Inc., is not explicitly identified as a small business in this context. Therefore, the direct impact on small business participation is likely minimal unless they were subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Navy, part of the Department of Defense, which has established oversight mechanisms. However, the effectiveness of oversight depends on the specific contract management practices employed and the clarity of performance expectations.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics.
- Potential for scope creep in consulting services.
- Limited information on specific deliverables.
- No indication of small business subcontracting.
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, ca, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $24.3 million to THOMAS GROUP, INC.. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is THOMAS GROUP, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $24.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-09-30. End: 2008-03-31.
What specific management improvements or efficiencies were Thomas Group, Inc. expected to deliver under this $24.3 million contract, and how were these outcomes measured?
The contract details do not specify the exact management improvements or efficiencies Thomas Group, Inc. was contracted to deliver. Typically, such contracts aim to optimize operations, streamline processes, or enhance strategic planning. Measuring the success of these services would ideally involve predefined metrics, performance reviews, and post-contract analysis of achieved objectives, which are not detailed here.
Given the firm fixed-price nature, what risks were identified and mitigated to ensure the $24.3 million contract remained within budget and met objectives?
While a firm fixed-price contract provides budget certainty, risks could include the contractor underestimating the effort required, leading to quality issues, or the government's requirements evolving beyond the initial scope. Mitigation strategies would involve thorough initial scope definition, robust contract management, clear communication channels, and potentially change order clauses for unforeseen but necessary adjustments.
How did the full and open competition process ensure that the $24.3 million awarded to Thomas Group, Inc. represented the best value compared to other potential solutions?
Full and open competition allows multiple qualified vendors to submit proposals, fostering a competitive environment that typically drives down prices and encourages innovative solutions. The evaluation criteria used by the Department of the Navy would have assessed not only price but also technical merit, past performance, and other factors to determine which proposal offered the best overall value to the government.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 5221 N O CONNOR BLVD # 50, IRVING, TX, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS10F0341K
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-09-30
Current End Date: 2008-03-31
Potential End Date: 2008-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2008-08-26
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)