DoD's $19.3M Contract for Engineering Technical Services Awarded to California Institute of Technology

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,286,686 ($19.3M)

Contractor: California Institute of Technology

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-09-23

End Date: 2011-03-22

Contract Duration: 2,006 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.6K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: 200512!006598!1700!N00244!FLEET AND INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CENT!N0024405C0066 !A!N! !N! ! !20050923!20060922!009584210!009584210!009584210!N!CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECH !1201 E CALIFORNIA BLVD MAI!PASADENA !CA!91125!56000!037!06!PASADENA !LOS ANGELES !CALIFORNIA!+000000716904!N!N!000029392734!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541710!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !D!U!S!1!001!N!1G!C!N!Z! ! !N!V!N! ! ! ! ! !A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y!1708!N62271!0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: MONTEREY, MONTEREY County, CALIFORNIA, 93943

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $19.3 million to CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY for work described as: 200512!006598!1700!N00244!FLEET AND INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CENT!N0024405C0066 !A!N! !N! ! !20050923!20060922!009584210!009584210!009584210!N!CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECH !1201 E CALIFORNIA BLVD MAI!PASADENA !CA!91125!56000!037!06!PASADENA !LOS … Key points: 1. The contract value is substantial at $19.3 million, indicating a significant need for specialized engineering services. 2. Awarded to California Institute of Technology, a known research institution, suggesting a focus on advanced R&D. 3. The 'NOT COMPETED' award type raises concerns about potential lack of price discovery and competition. 4. The sector is Research and Development, aligning with the contractor's expertise.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $19.3 million for engineering technical services is difficult to benchmark without specific details on the scope of work. However, for R&D services, this amount could be reasonable for a complex, multi-year project.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was awarded on a sole-source basis ('NOT COMPETED'). This limits price discovery and may not yield the best value for taxpayers, as competitive bidding is absent.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition could lead to higher costs than if the contract had been competitively bid, potentially impacting taxpayer funds negatively.

Public Impact

Research and Development: This contract supports advanced research, potentially leading to technological advancements. Educational Institution: Funding a prominent research university like Caltech can foster innovation and scientific breakthroughs. National Security: As a DoD contract, the services likely contribute to national defense capabilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competition.
  • Potential for overpayment due to lack of competitive bidding.
  • Long contract duration (initial award to final completion) may not reflect current market rates.

Positive Signals

  • Award to a reputable research institution.
  • Services likely support critical R&D efforts.
  • Potential for significant technological advancements.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically R&D in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences. Spending in this area is crucial for innovation but requires careful oversight to ensure value.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to the California Institute of Technology, a large research institution. There is no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants scrutiny. Oversight should focus on ensuring the necessity of the sole-source justification and the reasonableness of costs incurred throughout the contract's lifecycle.

Related Government Programs

  • Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of demonstrated competition
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Limited transparency on specific deliverables
  • Extended contract performance period

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, ca, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $19.3 million to CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. 200512!006598!1700!N00244!FLEET AND INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CENT!N0024405C0066 !A!N! !N! ! !20050923!20060922!009584210!009584210!009584210!N!CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECH !1201 E CALIFORNIA BLVD MAI!PASADENA !CA!91125!56000!037!06!PASADENA !LOS ANGELES !CALIFORNIA!+000000716904!N!N!000029392734!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541710!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-09-23. End: 2011-03-22.

What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and was it adequately documented?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED,' suggesting a sole-source award. A thorough review would require access to the contract file to ascertain the specific justification (e.g., unique capabilities, urgent need) and verify its adequacy and proper documentation according to federal acquisition regulations.

How does the cost of these engineering technical services compare to similar contracts awarded competitively?

Benchmarking this $19.3 million contract against competitive awards is challenging without detailed scope of work comparisons. However, sole-source contracts inherently lack the price discovery mechanism of competition, raising a presumption that costs might be higher than a competitively sourced equivalent.

What tangible outcomes or technological advancements resulted from this $19.3 million investment in engineering technical services?

Assessing the effectiveness requires examining the contract's deliverables and the subsequent impact of the R&D performed. Without specific reports on innovations, patents, or improved defense capabilities stemming from this contract, its ultimate value and effectiveness remain undetermined.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1201 E CALIFORNIA BLVD MAI, PASADENA, CA, 28

Business Categories: Category Business, Educational Institution, Higher Education, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-09-23

Current End Date: 2011-03-22

Potential End Date: 2011-03-22 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2010-10-07

More Contracts from California Institute of Technology

View all California Institute of Technology federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending