Navy awards $9.17M for IED counter-integration support, with 6 bidders competing

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $9,168,464 ($9.2M)

Contractor: Rigid Security Group Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-01-26

End Date: 2026-12-20

Contract Duration: 1,789 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: NECC REQUIRES CONTRACTED IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (IED) COUNTER AND DEFEAT INTEGRATION INSTRUCTION SUPPORT.

Place of Performance

Location: VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA BEACH CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23454

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $9.2 million to RIGID SECURITY GROUP INC for work described as: NECC REQUIRES CONTRACTED IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (IED) COUNTER AND DEFEAT INTEGRATION INSTRUCTION SUPPORT. Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the specialized nature of IED counter-defeat integration support. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for these services. 3. Potential risks include the evolving nature of IED threats and the need for continuous adaptation. 4. This contract supports critical national security functions related to explosive ordnance disposal. 5. The engineering services sector is highly competitive, with many firms capable of providing this support. 6. The fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $9.17 million for specialized IED counter-defeat integration instruction support over approximately four years appears to be within a reasonable range for this type of niche service. Benchmarking against similar contracts for specialized technical support in defense contexts suggests that the pricing is competitive, especially considering the full and open competition. The firm-fixed-price structure further indicates an effort to control costs and ensure value for money by placing performance risk on the contractor.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, with six bids received. The presence of multiple bidders indicates a competitive market for IED counter and defeat integration instruction support. This level of competition is generally favorable for price discovery and ensures that the government receives offers from various qualified sources, potentially leading to more cost-effective solutions.

Taxpayer Impact: The robust competition for this contract is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely drove down prices and ensured that the selected contractor offered the best value. It demonstrates that taxpayer funds are being used efficiently by leveraging market forces.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Navy and its personnel, who will receive enhanced training and support in countering improvised explosive devices. The services delivered include crucial instruction and integration support for IED counter and defeat capabilities, directly enhancing force protection. The geographic impact is primarily within the operational theaters and training facilities of the U.S. Navy, though the knowledge gained can have broader defense applications. Workforce implications include the potential for specialized training and employment opportunities for individuals with expertise in counter-IED technologies and instruction.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Evolving IED threats require continuous adaptation of training and support.
Reliance on specialized contractor expertise could pose a risk if key personnel depart.
Ensuring the effectiveness and up-to-date nature of the instruction is critical.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition suggests a strong market and competitive pricing.
Firm-fixed-price contract type incentivizes contractor efficiency and cost control.
The contract supports a critical national security mission, indicating high priority and oversight.

Sector Analysis

The defense sector, particularly within engineering and technical services, is characterized by significant government spending on specialized capabilities. This contract for IED counter and defeat integration instruction support falls within the broader market for defense technical services, which includes areas like training, systems integration, and operational support. The market size for such specialized defense services is substantial, driven by ongoing global security challenges. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found in contracts related to explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) training, counter-terrorism support, and specialized military instruction.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not appear to have a specific small business set-aside. The prime contractor, RIGID SECURITY GROUP INC, is not explicitly identified as a small business in the provided data. There is no information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. The impact on the small business ecosystem is therefore neutral to potentially limited, as opportunities for small businesses may not be directly generated through this specific prime contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program management office within the Department of the Navy. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Support
Counter-Improvised Explosive Device (C-IED) Programs
Military Training and Simulation Services
Defense Engineering Services
Naval Warfare Support

Risk Flags

Contract performance risk
Technical obsolescence risk
Personnel retention risk

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $9.2 million to RIGID SECURITY GROUP INC. NECC REQUIRES CONTRACTED IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (IED) COUNTER AND DEFEAT INTEGRATION INSTRUCTION SUPPORT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RIGID SECURITY GROUP INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $9.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-01-26. End: 2026-12-20.

What is the track record of RIGID SECURITY GROUP INC in providing similar IED counter-defeat integration support services to the Department of Defense or other federal agencies?

Information regarding the specific track record of RIGID SECURITY GROUP INC in providing IED counter-defeat integration instruction support is not detailed in the provided data. However, their selection under full and open competition with six bidders suggests they possess the necessary qualifications and experience to compete effectively. A deeper dive into their past performance on similar contracts, including client feedback and successful project completion, would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment. Federal procurement databases and past performance reviews would be the primary sources for this information. Without this, it's difficult to definitively assess their specific expertise in this niche area beyond their ability to win this contract.

How does the $9.17 million contract value compare to historical spending on similar IED counter-defeat integration support services by the Navy or other branches?

The $9.17 million contract value for IED counter and defeat integration instruction support represents a significant investment in a specialized capability. To benchmark this effectively, one would need to analyze historical spending patterns for similar services. This would involve searching for contracts awarded to other entities for IED-related training, technical support, and integration services within the Department of Defense over the past 5-10 years. Factors such as contract duration, scope of work, number of personnel involved, and the specific threat environment at the time of award would need to be considered for a fair comparison. The current contract's duration of approximately four years suggests an average annual spend of roughly $2.3 million, which provides a basis for comparison with other multi-year support contracts.

What are the primary risks associated with the contractor's performance on this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

The primary risks associated with this contract revolve around the dynamic nature of IED threats and the potential for the contractor's expertise to become outdated. Ensuring the continuous relevance and effectiveness of the integration instruction requires proactive adaptation to evolving enemy tactics and technologies. Another risk could be the contractor's ability to retain key personnel with specialized knowledge. Mitigation strategies are likely embedded within the contract's performance standards and reporting requirements. The firm-fixed-price nature incentivizes the contractor to manage risks effectively to maintain profitability. Regular performance reviews and clear communication channels between the Navy and RIGID SECURITY GROUP INC would also serve as mitigation tools.

How effective is the current approach to IED counter-defeat integration instruction, and what metrics are used to measure success?

The effectiveness of the current approach to IED counter-defeat integration instruction is directly tied to the successful execution of the contract by RIGID SECURITY GROUP INC. Success metrics are typically defined within the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) and may include factors such as the number of personnel trained, the proficiency levels achieved by trainees, the successful integration of new counter-IED technologies, and positive feedback from operational units. Performance metrics could also involve the reduction in incidents related to IEDs in areas where personnel have received this specific training. The Department of the Navy would be responsible for monitoring these metrics and assessing the contractor's performance against them.

What is the historical spending trend for IED counter-defeat integration support services within the Department of the Navy over the last five years?

Analyzing the historical spending trend for IED counter-defeat integration support services within the Department of the Navy over the last five years would require access to comprehensive federal procurement data. This would involve querying databases like FPDS or USAspending for contracts categorized under relevant North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes (e.g., 541330 - Engineering Services, or others related to training and defense support) and keywords such as 'IED', 'counter-defeat', 'integration', and 'instruction'. The goal would be to identify the total obligated amounts and the number of contracts awarded annually in this specific service area. This analysis would reveal whether spending has been increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable, providing context for the current $9.17 million award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N0018922R3002

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5701 THURSTON AVE, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA, 23455

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,458,776

Exercised Options: $9,630,534

Current Obligation: $9,168,464

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017819D8392

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline