CACI, INC. - FEDERAL awarded $20.5M for Naval Aviation Production Process Sustainment, supporting Chief of Naval Air Training

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,510,344 ($20.5M)

Contractor: CACI, Inc. - Federal

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2021-03-11

End Date: 2024-03-16

Contract Duration: 1,101 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: PROFESSIONAL AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL AIR TRAINING'S (CNATRA'S) NAVAL AVIATION PRODUCTION PROCESS SUSTAINMENT (NAPPS).

Place of Performance

Location: CORPUS CHRISTI, NUECES County, TEXAS, 78419

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $20.5 million to CACI, INC. - FEDERAL for work described as: PROFESSIONAL AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL AIR TRAINING'S (CNATRA'S) NAVAL AVIATION PRODUCTION PROCESS SUSTAINMENT (NAPPS). Key points: 1. Contract provides essential professional and management services for naval aviation training. 2. The duration of the contract spans over three years, indicating a sustained need. 3. Services are critical for maintaining the efficiency and effectiveness of aviation production processes. 4. The contract is a delivery order, suggesting it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicle. 5. Performance is located in Texas, a key state for defense and aerospace activities. 6. The cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) pricing structure allows for cost reimbursement plus a fixed fee, which can incentivize efficiency but requires careful oversight.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $20.5 million over approximately three years appears reasonable for specialized professional and management services supporting a critical naval training command. Benchmarking against similar contracts for defense-related professional services suggests this is within an expected range. The CPFF structure, while common, necessitates diligent monitoring to ensure costs remain controlled and the fixed fee provides adequate profit without excessive risk to the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The fact that it is a single delivery order suggests it was competed as part of a larger IDIQ contract. The specific number of bidders for this delivery order is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation implies a competitive process was initiated.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for taxpayers compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Chief of Naval Air Training (CNATRA) and its personnel, who receive support services. Services delivered are professional and management-focused, aimed at sustaining and improving the naval aviation production process. The geographic impact is concentrated in Texas, where the contract is performed. Workforce implications include the employment of skilled professionals in management, engineering, and technical support roles.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts require robust oversight to prevent cost overruns.
The specific nature of 'production process sustainment' may involve proprietary methodologies requiring careful management.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive marketplace.
The contract supports a critical training function within the Department of the Navy.
Longer contract duration implies a stable and ongoing requirement, potentially leading to efficiencies.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically engineering services. The Department of Defense is a major consumer of such services, utilizing them for program management, technical support, and operational sustainment across various platforms. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms capable of supporting complex defense requirements. Spending in this category is substantial, reflecting the ongoing need for specialized expertise to maintain readiness and technological advantage.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a delivery order under a potentially larger IDIQ, subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist, depending on the prime contractor's strategy and the specific requirements of the order. However, the primary awardee, CACI, Inc. - Federal, is a large business, suggesting the direct impact on small business set-asides is minimal for this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contract administration office within the Department of the Navy. Performance monitoring, cost tracking, and adherence to contract terms are key oversight functions. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Naval Aviation Training Programs
Defense Professional Services
Engineering Services Contracts
Department of the Navy Support Services

Risk Flags

Cost Overruns Risk (CPFF)
Performance Monitoring Challenges
Scope Creep Potential

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $20.5 million to CACI, INC. - FEDERAL. PROFESSIONAL AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL AIR TRAINING'S (CNATRA'S) NAVAL AVIATION PRODUCTION PROCESS SUSTAINMENT (NAPPS).

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CACI, INC. - FEDERAL.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-03-11. End: 2024-03-16.

What is CACI, Inc. - Federal's track record with the Department of the Navy and similar professional services contracts?

CACI, Inc. - Federal has a substantial history of contracting with the Department of Defense, including the Department of the Navy. They are a large provider of IT, intelligence, and other professional services. Their track record often includes support for complex command and control systems, data analytics, and operational support. For contracts similar to this one, involving process sustainment and management support, CACI typically demonstrates capability through successful past performance on other defense contracts. Reviewing their contract history on federal procurement databases would reveal the volume and types of services previously rendered to the Navy, providing context for their ability to execute this specific award effectively. Their performance ratings on previous contracts are a key indicator of their reliability and quality of service.

How does the $20.5 million value compare to other Naval Aviation Production Process Sustainment contracts?

The $20.5 million value for this contract, spanning approximately three years, represents a significant but not exceptionally large award for specialized professional and management services within the defense sector. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare it against similar contracts for 'production process sustainment' or 'aviation training support' awarded by the Department of the Navy or other branches of the military. The average value and duration of such contracts would provide context. Given the critical nature of naval aviation training, it's plausible that contracts of this magnitude are necessary to ensure operational readiness and efficiency. Without direct comparative data on identical services, this figure appears to be a reasonable investment for sustained support.

What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for this type of service?

The primary risk with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract, like the one awarded to CACI, Inc. - Federal, is the potential for cost overruns. While the fixed fee provides the contractor with a defined profit margin, the government bears the risk of reimbursing all allowable costs. This structure can incentivize contractors to incur costs that might be avoided under a fixed-price contract, as their profit is not directly tied to cost savings. Effective oversight, rigorous auditing of expenses, and clear definition of allowable costs are crucial to mitigate this risk. Additionally, ensuring the 'fixed fee' is appropriately set to reflect the risk and effort involved is important for fair pricing.

How effective is 'full and open competition' in ensuring value for money for the taxpayer in this specific case?

Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring value for money for taxpayers. By allowing all responsible sources to bid, it fosters a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovation. For this contract, the 'full and open' designation suggests that the Department of the Navy sought the best possible offer from a wide range of qualified contractors. While the specific number of bidders for this delivery order isn't detailed, the principle of broad competition increases the likelihood that the government secured services at a competitive rate. The ultimate value for money also depends on the quality of services delivered and the effectiveness of contract oversight.

What are the historical spending patterns for professional and management services supporting naval aviation training?

Historical spending on professional and management services for naval aviation training has been substantial and consistent, reflecting the enduring need for specialized support to maintain readiness and operational effectiveness. The Department of the Navy, through various commands like CNATRA, regularly procures services for training program management, curriculum development, simulation support, and process optimization. Spending in this area fluctuates based on modernization efforts, fleet size, and strategic priorities, but generally represents a significant portion of the training budget. Analyzing past budgets and contract awards for similar services would reveal trends in annual expenditures and the types of contractors most frequently engaged.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N0018921R3000

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: CACI International Inc

Address: 14370 NEWBROOK DRIVE, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $20,510,344

Exercised Options: $20,510,344

Current Obligation: $20,510,344

Actual Outlays: $607,840

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 1

Total Subaward Amount: $721,456

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017819D7295

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline