DoD Awards $62.2M for ADP Facility Operations & Maintenance Services to Intecs International Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,750,515 ($13.8M)
Contractor: Intecs International Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 1997-06-03
End Date: 2010-09-22
Contract Duration: 4,859 days
Daily Burn Rate: $2.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: IT
Official Description: 199709!1700!1580!BW10C!NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, DA!N0017897C2009 !A!*!* !19970603!19970930!622702942!622702942!622702942!N!0P499!INTECS INTERNATIONAL INC !440 VIKING DR STE 250 !VIRGINIA BEACH !VA!23452!21008!099!51!DAHLGREN !KING GEORGE !VIRGINIA !0001!+000000400000!N!N!000000000000!D301!ADP FACILITY OPERATION & MAINTENANCE SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !8711!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !N!U!2!002!K!* !Z!N!Z!* !* !N!A!*!*!*!A!B!A!*!* !B!Y!A!B!N!*!*!*!*!*!
Place of Performance
Location: CLIFTON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20124
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.8 million to INTECS INTERNATIONAL INC for work described as: 199709!1700!1580!BW10C!NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, DA!N0017897C2009 !A!*!* !19970603!19970930!622702942!622702942!622702942!N!0P499!INTECS INTERNATIONAL INC !440 VIKING DR STE 250 !VIRGINIA BEACH !VA!23452!21008!099!51!DAHLGREN !KING G… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for essential IT infrastructure support. 2. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources. 3. Risk appears moderate given the service nature and duration. 4. Sector is Information Technology, supporting Naval operations.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $62.2M over its period of performance is difficult to benchmark without specific service details. However, for facility operations and maintenance, this amount suggests a significant scope of work.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' indicating a competitive process but with specific source exclusions. This method aims for best value while potentially limiting the initial pool of bidders.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for critical IT infrastructure maintenance, ensuring operational readiness for the Navy. The competitive nature should drive cost-effectiveness.
Public Impact
Ensures continued operation of vital Naval IT facilities. Supports technological infrastructure for defense operations. Potential for job creation in the Virginia Beach area.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited details on specific service deliverables.
- Potential for scope creep in long-term facility contracts.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical operations.
Positive Signals
- Competitive award process.
- Supports essential defense IT infrastructure.
- Long-term contract provides stability.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically focusing on facility operations and maintenance for defense. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining the technological backbone of military operations, with benchmarks varying widely based on facility size and complexity.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was managed by the Department of Defense, with oversight likely from the Naval Surface Warfare Center. The duration suggests a need for robust oversight to ensure performance and cost control.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Contract duration is exceptionally long.
- Cost-plus contract type can lead to cost overruns.
- Specific service details are not readily available.
- Potential for vendor lock-in due to specialized nature.
Tags
department-of-defense, va, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.8 million to INTECS INTERNATIONAL INC. 199709!1700!1580!BW10C!NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, DA!N0017897C2009 !A!*!* !19970603!19970930!622702942!622702942!622702942!N!0P499!INTECS INTERNATIONAL INC !440 VIKING DR STE 250 !VIRGINIA BEACH !VA!23452!21008!099!51!DAHLGREN !KING GEORGE !VIRGINIA !0001!+000000400000!N!N!000000000000!D301!ADP FACILITY OPERATION & MAINTENANCE SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !8711!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !N!U!2!0
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is INTECS INTERNATIONAL INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 1997-06-03. End: 2010-09-22.
What specific metrics were used to evaluate the 'best value' in this full and open competition after source exclusion?
The 'best value' determination likely involved a combination of technical approach, past performance, and price. Given the 'cost plus fixed fee' structure, the evaluation would focus on the contractor's proposed fee and their ability to manage costs effectively while meeting technical requirements for ADP facility operations and maintenance.
What are the primary risks associated with a long-term (4859 days) contract for facility operations and maintenance?
Primary risks include potential cost overruns due to unforeseen maintenance needs or inflation, contractor performance degradation over time, and the risk of technological obsolescence impacting the facility's operational effectiveness. Ensuring clear performance standards and regular reviews is crucial to mitigate these risks.
How does the 'exclusion of sources' clause impact the overall effectiveness and cost of this contract?
Excluding sources can limit the competitive landscape, potentially leading to higher prices or reduced innovation compared to a truly open competition. However, it may be justified if specific expertise or security clearances are required, ensuring a more effective outcome for specialized needs, provided the exclusion criteria are well-defined and defensible.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Contractor Details
Address: 440 VIKING DR STE 250, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA, 02
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Woman Owned Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 1997-06-03
Current End Date: 2010-09-22
Potential End Date: 2010-09-22 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-06-06
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)