DoD awards $9.29M for Enterprise Configuration Management Support to Zekiah Technologies Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $9,285,008 ($9.3M)

Contractor: Zekiah Technologies Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-08-01

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $25.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: ENTERPRISE CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT (ECM) SUPPORT FOLLOW-ON

Place of Performance

Location: KING GEORGE, KING GEORGE County, VIRGINIA, 22485

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $9.3 million to ZEKIAH TECHNOLOGIES INC for work described as: ENTERPRISE CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT (ECM) SUPPORT FOLLOW-ON Key points: 1. Contract value represents a moderate investment in specialized engineering services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive bidding environment. 3. The contract duration of one year indicates a focused scope of work. 4. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing structure requires careful monitoring of costs. 5. This award falls within the broader category of engineering services for the defense sector. 6. The award is a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $9.29 million for one year of Enterprise Configuration Management (ECM) support appears reasonable given the specialized nature of engineering services. Benchmarking against similar DoD contracts for ECM support would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The CPFF contract type suggests that while the fixed fee is set, the cost reimbursement aspect necessitates diligent oversight to ensure costs remain within expected parameters and do not escalate unnecessarily.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The data shows two bids were received. While two bidders suggest some level of competition, it is on the lower end and may not fully leverage the potential for price discovery compared to a scenario with a larger number of competitive offers.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process, even with two bidders, is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages contractors to offer more competitive pricing to secure the contract.

Public Impact

The Department of the Navy benefits from specialized support for its Enterprise Configuration Management systems. This contract ensures the continued operation and potential enhancement of critical ECM capabilities. The services are likely to be performed in Virginia, supporting the local economy and workforce. The contract supports a specialized engineering workforce within the defense industrial base.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing requires robust oversight to manage cost escalations.
Limited competition (2 bidders) may reduce the pressure for optimal pricing.
The follow-on nature of the award warrants review of past performance and potential for contractor lock-in.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, maximizing potential bidder pool.
Zekiah Technologies Inc. is an established entity, suggesting a degree of reliability.
The contract is a delivery order, implying it's part of a pre-competed contract vehicle, potentially streamlining acquisition.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), a critical component of the defense industrial base. The market for specialized engineering and configuration management support for government systems is substantial, driven by the need for complex system integration and maintenance. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar IT and engineering support services within the DoD can range widely depending on scope and duration, but this award appears to be a moderate-sized engagement.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a result, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses mandated by this specific award. The primary contractor, Zekiah Technologies Inc., is likely a mid-sized or large business, and their subcontracting practices on this contract would depend on their internal policies and the specific requirements of the larger contract vehicle from which this delivery order was issued.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract will likely involve the Department of Defense's contracting officers and potentially program management offices responsible for ECM. Accountability measures will be tied to the achievement of performance standards outlined in the contract. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed cost breakdowns may be proprietary. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Defense IT Support Services
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Support
Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance (SETA)
Configuration Management Services
Naval Information Warfare Systems Command (NAVWAR) Contracts

Risk Flags

Cost control risk due to CPFF structure
Potential for reduced price competition with only two bidders
Need for ongoing performance monitoring to ensure sustained effectiveness

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $9.3 million to ZEKIAH TECHNOLOGIES INC. ENTERPRISE CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT (ECM) SUPPORT FOLLOW-ON

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ZEKIAH TECHNOLOGIES INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $9.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-08-01. End: 2026-07-31.

What is Zekiah Technologies Inc.'s track record with the Department of Defense, particularly in providing Enterprise Configuration Management support?

Zekiah Technologies Inc. has a history of contracting with the Department of Defense, including various agencies within the Navy. Their experience often encompasses IT services, engineering support, and specialized technical assistance. For Enterprise Configuration Management (ECM) specifically, their past performance on similar contracts would be a key indicator of their capability. Reviewing contract databases for previous awards to Zekiah Technologies for ECM or closely related services would reveal the scope, value, and duration of their prior work. This analysis would help assess their demonstrated ability to deliver on the requirements of this follow-on contract, including their success in meeting performance metrics and managing costs on prior engagements.

How does the $9.29 million contract value compare to similar ECM support contracts awarded by the DoD?

The $9.29 million contract value for one year of Enterprise Configuration Management (ECM) support is a moderate figure within the context of large federal IT and engineering service procurements. To benchmark effectively, one would compare this award to other contracts for similar services (ECM, systems engineering, IT support) awarded by the Department of Defense or other federal agencies over the past 2-3 years. Factors such as contract duration, specific deliverables, labor categories, and the level of competition influence pricing. If similar one-year contracts for comparable ECM support have been awarded in the range of $7-12 million, then this award appears to be within a reasonable market range. Awards significantly higher or lower might warrant further investigation into the scope or pricing structure.

What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for ECM support?

The primary risk with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract, such as this one for ECM support, lies in cost control and contractor incentive. While the fixed fee provides the contractor with a predictable profit margin, the government bears the risk of cost overruns. If the contractor's actual costs exceed estimates, the government pays those costs plus the agreed-upon fixed fee. This structure can incentivize contractors to incur higher costs if not managed diligently, as their fee remains constant. Effective oversight is crucial to ensure that costs are reasonable, allocable, and allowable, and that the contractor exercises efficient management practices to control expenses. The government must actively monitor expenditures and performance to mitigate the risk of inflated costs.

Given this is a follow-on contract, what does it imply about the effectiveness of the previous ECM support?

The fact that this is a follow-on contract for Enterprise Configuration Management (ECM) support suggests that the services provided under the previous contract were likely deemed satisfactory by the Department of the Navy. Agencies typically issue follow-on contracts when they are pleased with the contractor's performance, the services are critical to ongoing operations, and there is a desire to maintain continuity. It implies that Zekiah Technologies Inc. has met or exceeded expectations in delivering ECM support previously. However, it also underscores the importance of continued performance monitoring to ensure that the effectiveness is sustained and that the contract continues to meet evolving mission requirements without complacency.

How does the limited competition (2 bidders) potentially impact the value received by the government?

Limited competition, as indicated by only two bidders for this contract, can potentially reduce the overall value received by the government. When fewer companies compete, the pressure to offer the lowest price or the most innovative solution is diminished compared to a scenario with multiple bidders. While the award was made under 'full and open' competition, the low number of bids suggests that perhaps fewer companies were capable, interested, or able to bid effectively. This could lead to a higher-than-necessary price or less favorable terms. The government's negotiation leverage is typically stronger with a larger pool of competitors, making the assessment of price reasonableness and overall value more challenging with only two offers.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N0017825R3010

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 103 CENTENNIAL ST, STE G, LA PLATA, MD, 20646

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $115,109,683

Exercised Options: $16,765,912

Current Obligation: $9,285,008

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017819D8863

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline