DoD's $24.2M contract for administrative support awarded to Tatitlek Technologies, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,200,074 ($24.2M)

Contractor: Tatitlek Technologies, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2020-06-12

End Date: 2026-02-14

Contract Duration: 2,073 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ADMINISTRATIVE AND CLERICAL SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: ANCHORAGE, ANCHORAGE County, ALASKA, 99503

State: Alaska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $24.2 million to TATITLEK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC for work described as: ADMINISTRATIVE AND CLERICAL SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of over 2000 days indicates a long-term need for these services. 3. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing structure may lead to cost overruns if not carefully managed. 4. The contract is for administrative and clerical support services, a common but essential function. 5. The award to Tatitlek Technologies, LLC, a single entity, warrants a review of their capacity and past performance. 6. The contract's value is moderate within the context of large federal procurements.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's value of $24.2 million over approximately 5.7 years suggests an average annual spend of around $4.2 million. Benchmarking this against similar administrative support contracts is challenging without more specific service details. The CPFF structure introduces inherent risk for cost control, as the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a fixed fee. This can incentivize cost increases if not rigorously monitored by the agency.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 8 bidders (no) suggests a healthy level of interest and competition for this requirement. A competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a more cost-effective solution compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.

Public Impact

The Department of the Navy benefits from essential administrative and clerical support services, enabling its operations. The contract supports the functioning of naval operations, contributing to national defense readiness. The geographic impact is primarily within Alaska (AK, SN), where the contractor is based. The contract likely supports a workforce involved in administrative and clerical tasks, potentially creating or sustaining jobs.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The CPFF contract type can lead to cost uncertainty if not managed effectively.
Limited insight into specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess value for money comprehensively.
The long duration of the contract requires sustained oversight to ensure continued relevance and efficiency.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process.
Multiple bidders participated, suggesting market interest and potential for competitive pricing.
The contract addresses a clear need for administrative support within the Department of Defense.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broad category of professional, scientific, and technical services, specifically administrative and clerical support. The federal government is a significant consumer of such services across all its agencies. While specific market size data for administrative support services procured by the DoD is not readily available, the overall federal spending on services is in the hundreds of billions annually. This contract represents a small fraction of that total, serving a specific operational need within the Navy.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans. Without a small business set-aside, the primary contractor, Tatitlek Technologies, LLC, will likely handle the majority of the work, with potential for subcontracting opportunities depending on their internal capabilities and strategy.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contract administration office within the Department of the Navy. Performance monitoring, invoice review, and compliance checks are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS, where award details are published. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Administrative Support Services
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Department of Defense Contracts
Navy Contracts
Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee Contracts

Risk Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type requires careful cost monitoring.
Long contract duration necessitates sustained performance management.
Limited public detail on specific performance metrics.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $24.2 million to TATITLEK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. ADMINISTRATIVE AND CLERICAL SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TATITLEK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-06-12. End: 2026-02-14.

What is the track record of Tatitlek Technologies, LLC in performing similar administrative support contracts for the federal government?

Assessing Tatitlek Technologies, LLC's track record requires a deeper dive into their contract history beyond this single award. While this contract is for administrative and clerical support, their past performance on similar contracts, especially those with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure, would be crucial. Information on past performance evaluations, any contract disputes, or awards for exceptional performance would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and capability. Without access to detailed performance reviews or a broader history of their awards in this specific service area, it's difficult to definitively assess their suitability beyond the fact they were selected in a competitive process.

How does the estimated annual value of this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar administrative support services?

The estimated annual value of this contract is approximately $4.2 million ($24.2M / ~5.7 years). Benchmarking this against industry standards for administrative and clerical support services is complex without granular details on the scope of work, required skill sets, and service levels. However, for large-scale federal contracts, this annual value is moderate. Factors influencing benchmarks include the complexity of tasks, security clearance requirements, geographic location, and the specific mix of administrative functions (e.g., general office support, specialized program support, financial administration). A comprehensive benchmark would require comparing this contract's specific deliverables and labor mix against aggregated data from similar government or commercial contracts.

What are the primary risks associated with the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type for this administrative support requirement?

The primary risk with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract is the potential for cost overruns. While the contractor is incentivized to control costs to protect their fixed fee, the government bears the risk of reimbursing all allowable costs. If the scope of work expands or unforeseen challenges arise, the total cost to the government can exceed initial estimates. Effective management requires rigorous oversight of allowable costs, clear definition of the fixed fee, and robust change management processes. For administrative support, risks might include increased labor hours due to inefficient processes or unexpected administrative burdens not fully anticipated during contract formulation.

How effective is the competition level (8 bidders) in ensuring optimal value for taxpayers on this contract?

Having eight bidders for this contract suggests a healthy level of competition, which is generally positive for taxpayers. A larger pool of bidders increases the likelihood that the government receives competitive pricing and a wider range of technical approaches. This competitive pressure can drive down costs and encourage innovation. However, the ultimate value for taxpayers also depends on the quality of the proposals received and the effectiveness of the source selection process. If the evaluation criteria were well-defined and the selection process rigorous, the competition should have yielded a cost-effective and suitable solution. Continued monitoring of performance and costs throughout the contract's life is essential to ensure sustained value.

What is the historical spending trend for administrative and clerical support services by the Department of the Navy?

Analyzing historical spending trends for administrative and clerical support services by the Department of the Navy would provide context for this $24.2 million award. Such an analysis would involve examining annual expenditures on similar service categories over several fiscal years. This could reveal whether spending in this area is increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable, and whether this contract represents a typical or an outlier award in terms of value and duration. Understanding these trends can help identify potential shifts in requirements, efficiency initiatives, or changes in contracting strategies within the Navy for these essential support functions.

What are the implications of the contract being awarded in Alaska (AK, SN) for service delivery and oversight?

The contract's base in Alaska (AK, SN) may have implications for service delivery and oversight. If the administrative support is primarily performed remotely or digitally, the geographic location might have minimal impact. However, if on-site presence is required, the distance could affect travel costs, logistical coordination, and the ease of direct oversight by Navy personnel. The contractor's familiarity with local conditions and workforce in Alaska could be an advantage. Oversight might require more reliance on remote monitoring tools and potentially periodic site visits, which could incur additional costs or require specific arrangements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N0017819R3010

Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Tatitlek Corporation

Address: 561 E 36TH AVE, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $49,103,293

Exercised Options: $49,084,691

Current Obligation: $24,200,074

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017816D9063

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline