DoD awards $43.5M for Building 1190 Renovation to Chickasaw Defense Group, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $43,497,606 ($43.5M)

Contractor: Chickasaw Defense Group, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-09-29

End Date: 2027-11-14

Contract Duration: 776 days

Daily Burn Rate: $56.1K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: BUILDING 1190 RENOVATION

Place of Performance

Location: INDIAN HEAD, CHARLES County, MARYLAND, 20640

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $43.5 million to CHICKASAW DEFENSE GROUP, LLC for work described as: BUILDING 1190 RENOVATION Key points: 1. Contract awarded for building renovation, indicating a need for infrastructure upgrades. 2. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 3. The duration of the contract is substantial, spanning over two years. 4. The project is located in Maryland, potentially impacting the local construction workforce. 5. The award was not competitively solicited, raising questions about price discovery. 6. The contractor, Chickasaw Defense Group, LLC, is the sole awardee. 7. The contract value is significant, suggesting a large-scale renovation project.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $43.5 million for a building renovation is substantial. Without comparable project data or detailed scope of work, it is difficult to benchmark the value for money. The firm fixed-price nature suggests a defined scope, but the lack of competition makes it challenging to assess if the pricing is competitive or represents a fair market value. Further analysis would require understanding the specific renovation requirements and comparing them to similar government or commercial projects.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not open to competition from other potential bidders. This approach is typically used when only one source is capable of meeting the requirement, or in specific circumstances where full and open competition is not feasible or not in the government's interest. The lack of competition means that the government did not benefit from a bidding process that could have driven down prices or offered alternative solutions.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not have received the best possible price due to the absence of competitive bidding. The government's ability to negotiate favorable terms is limited when only one contractor is considered.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and its personnel who will utilize the renovated Building 1190. The services delivered include comprehensive renovation of a government building. The geographic impact is localized to Maryland, where the building is situated. The project is likely to have implications for the local construction workforce, providing employment opportunities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition may lead to higher costs for taxpayers.
Sole-source award raises concerns about the justification for not seeking competitive bids.
The significant contract value warrants close scrutiny of project execution and cost controls.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
The contract is awarded to a specific entity, Chickasaw Defense Group, LLC.
The project aims to renovate an existing building, potentially improving infrastructure.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. This sector is characterized by a wide range of projects, from small renovations to large-scale new constructions. Government spending in this area is substantial, supporting infrastructure development and maintenance. Benchmarking this contract's value would require comparing it to similar-sized renovation projects within the federal or commercial construction markets, considering factors like building size, complexity, and location.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation is not a primary focus for this specific award, as the 'sb' field is false. There is no explicit mention of small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements. This suggests that the prime contractor, Chickasaw Defense Group, LLC, is not obligated to meet specific small business utilization goals on this contract. The impact on the small business ecosystem is therefore minimal unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Navy, under the broader Department of Defense. Accountability measures would typically involve contract performance monitoring, milestone reviews, and adherence to the firm fixed-price agreement. Transparency may be limited due to the sole-source nature of the award, but contract details and performance reports are generally accessible through federal procurement databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Facilities Management
Government Building Construction
Military Base Infrastructure
Federal Real Property Management

Risk Flags

Sole-source award lacks competitive justification.
Significant contract value requires robust oversight.
Limited public information on project scope and contractor history.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $43.5 million to CHICKASAW DEFENSE GROUP, LLC. BUILDING 1190 RENOVATION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CHICKASAW DEFENSE GROUP, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $43.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-29. End: 2027-11-14.

What is the specific scope of work for the Building 1190 renovation?

The provided data does not detail the specific scope of work for the Building 1190 renovation. It only indicates the contract is for 'BUILDING 1190 RENOVATION' and provides the total award amount, contractor, and dates. A comprehensive understanding of the project's requirements, such as structural repairs, system upgrades (HVAC, electrical, plumbing), interior modifications, or facade improvements, would be necessary to fully assess the value and necessity of the $43.5 million expenditure. This information is typically found in the contract's statement of work (SOW) or performance work statement (PWS), which are not included in the provided data.

Why was this contract awarded on a sole-source basis?

The justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis is not provided in the given data. Typically, sole-source awards are made when only one responsible source is available to meet the government's needs, or when a compelling urgency dictates that the government cannot obtain full and open competition. Other reasons can include specific research and development requirements or international agreements. Without the official justification document (e.g., a Justification and Approval - J&A), it is impossible to determine the specific rationale behind not competing this $43.5 million renovation contract, raising potential concerns about whether competition could have yielded better pricing or terms for the government.

What is the track record of Chickasaw Defense Group, LLC with federal contracts?

The provided data identifies Chickasaw Defense Group, LLC as the contractor for this $43.5 million renovation but does not offer details on their past performance or track record with federal contracts. To assess their reliability and experience, one would need to examine their contract history, including the types of projects they have completed, their performance ratings on previous government contracts, and any history of contract disputes or terminations. A thorough review of federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS would be necessary to build a comprehensive profile of the contractor's past performance and suitability for this significant renovation project.

How does the $43.5 million cost compare to similar building renovation projects?

Benchmarking the $43.5 million cost against similar federal building renovation projects is challenging without more specific details about Building 1190's size, condition, and the scope of the renovation. However, as a general indicator, large-scale renovations of institutional or commercial buildings can range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars, depending on complexity and scale. Given the sole-source nature of this award, a direct comparison to competitively bid projects would be more informative to assess potential cost savings that might have been achieved through competition. Further analysis would require access to detailed project scopes and cost breakdowns for comparable projects.

What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source contract of this magnitude?

The primary risk associated with a sole-source contract of this magnitude ($43.5 million) is the potential for inflated pricing due to the lack of competitive pressure. Without competing bids, there is less incentive for the contractor to offer the most cost-effective solution. Additionally, there's a risk that the government may not be aware of all available qualified sources, potentially missing out on innovative approaches or better value propositions. Oversight becomes even more critical to ensure the contractor delivers the required quality and stays within budget, as the government has fewer leverage points compared to a competitive scenario.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: N0017424R0116

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2600 JOHN SAXON BLVD # 406, NORMAN, OK, 73071

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $43,497,606

Exercised Options: $43,497,606

Current Obligation: $43,497,606

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 6

Total Subaward Amount: $13,327,197

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline