Navy awards $15.5M engineering services contract to VSE Corporation for industrial revitalization support
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $15,524,479 ($15.5M)
Contractor: VSE Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2019-03-23
End Date: 2026-03-21
Contract Duration: 2,555 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES ANALYTICAL, TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES FOR INDUSTRIAL REVITALIZATION EFFORTS TO INCLUDE CARETAKING ASSISTANCE, MODERNIZATION, EXPLOSIVES/ENERGETICS DECONTAMINATION, DEMILITARIZATION,DEMOLITION, DISPOSAL AND DIVESTITURE SUPPORT FOR THE NAVY, OTHER DOD AND NON-DOD CUSTOMERS.
Place of Performance
Location: ALEXANDRIA, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22310
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $15.5 million to VSE CORPORATION for work described as: THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES ANALYTICAL, TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES FOR INDUSTRIAL REVITALIZATION EFFORTS TO INCLUDE CARETAKING ASSISTANCE, MODERNIZATION, EXPLOSIVES/ENERGETICS DECONTAMINATION, DEMILITARIZATION,DEMOLITION, DISPOSAL AND DIVESTITURE SUPPORT FOR THE NAVY, … Key points: 1. Contract provides critical support for Navy's industrial revitalization, including hazardous material handling and disposal. 2. VSE Corporation, a long-standing defense contractor, holds this significant award. 3. The contract duration extends over seven years, indicating a long-term need for these specialized services. 4. Services encompass a wide range of activities from modernization to demolition and divestiture. 5. This award falls under the Engineering Services NAICS code, a common category for such support. 6. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which allows for flexibility but requires careful cost oversight.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's value of $15.5 million over approximately seven years suggests a moderate annual spend for specialized industrial revitalization services. Benchmarking this against similar large-scale environmental and engineering support contracts for the Department of Defense is challenging without more granular data on the specific services provided. However, the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure implies that costs are reimbursed plus a fixed fee, which can be efficient for evolving requirements but necessitates robust oversight to ensure value for money. The fixed fee component provides some predictability for contractor profit.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but full and open competition generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government. This approach aligns with federal procurement best practices for ensuring fair and transparent award processes.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining competitive pricing and innovative solutions, thereby maximizing the value of federal dollars spent on essential services.
Public Impact
The U.S. Navy is the primary beneficiary, receiving essential support for its industrial revitalization and hazardous material management programs. Services delivered include modernization, explosives decontamination, demilitarization, demolition, disposal, and divestiture support. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around Navy installations requiring these specialized industrial services, potentially across multiple states. This contract supports a specialized workforce skilled in engineering, environmental remediation, and hazardous material handling.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts can lead to cost overruns if not managed diligently.
- The extended duration of the contract requires ongoing monitoring to ensure continued performance and value.
- Reliance on a single contractor for such a broad scope of critical services may pose a risk if performance falters.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process that likely yielded fair pricing.
- VSE Corporation has a history of supporting defense contracts, indicating potential familiarity with government requirements.
- The contract addresses critical needs for industrial revitalization and hazardous material management, ensuring operational readiness and environmental compliance.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), a broad category encompassing a wide range of professional engineering disciplines. The market for these services is substantial within the federal government, particularly for agencies like the Department of Defense that manage extensive infrastructure and legacy systems requiring specialized support for modernization, environmental remediation, and disposal. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other large-scale environmental, demolition, and engineering support contracts awarded to various defense contractors.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation (sb) is false, and there is no explicit small business set-aside (ss) noted for this contract. This suggests that the primary award was not specifically targeted towards small businesses. However, VSE Corporation, as the prime contractor, may engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill certain aspects of the contract, depending on the specific requirements and VSE's subcontracting strategy. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract is primarily the responsibility of the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. They will monitor VSE Corporation's costs, performance, and adherence to contract terms. Transparency is facilitated through contract reporting requirements. While specific Inspector General (IG) jurisdiction is not detailed, the DoD IG typically has oversight over major defense contracts to investigate fraud, waste, and abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Environmental Remediation Programs
- Military Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Support Services
- Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Disposal Services
- Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Services Contracts
- Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Contracts
Risk Flags
- Cost Overrun Risk (CPFF Contract Type)
- Performance Risk (Complex Services)
- Long-Term Dependency Risk
- Environmental Compliance Risk
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, full-and-open-competition, cost-plus-fixed-fee, industrial-revitalization, hazardous-materials-management, defense-contractor, long-term-contract, virginia
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $15.5 million to VSE CORPORATION. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES ANALYTICAL, TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES FOR INDUSTRIAL REVITALIZATION EFFORTS TO INCLUDE CARETAKING ASSISTANCE, MODERNIZATION, EXPLOSIVES/ENERGETICS DECONTAMINATION, DEMILITARIZATION,DEMOLITION, DISPOSAL AND DIVESTITURE SUPPORT FOR THE NAVY, OTHER DOD AND NON-DOD CUSTOMERS.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is VSE CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $15.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2019-03-23. End: 2026-03-21.
What is VSE Corporation's track record with similar large-scale environmental and engineering support contracts for the Department of Defense?
VSE Corporation has a significant history of supporting Department of Defense (DoD) contracts, often involving complex engineering, logistics, and technical services. They have previously been awarded contracts for ship maintenance, fleet readiness, and base operations support. Their experience likely includes managing large teams, complex project timelines, and stringent regulatory compliance, which are all relevant to the industrial revitalization services required under this contract. Analyzing their past performance on similar CPFF contracts would provide further insight into their ability to manage costs and deliver effectively within the specified parameters.
How does the annual spending on this contract compare to other similar engineering services contracts awarded by the Navy or DoD?
The approximate annual spend for this contract, averaging around $2.2 million ($15.5M / 7 years), appears moderate for specialized engineering and industrial support services within the DoD. However, direct comparisons are difficult without knowing the precise scope and complexity of services rendered. Larger environmental remediation or major infrastructure modernization contracts can easily reach tens or hundreds of millions annually. This contract's value suggests it supports a specific set of revitalization efforts rather than a comprehensive base overhaul. Benchmarking would require identifying contracts with similar service descriptions (demilitarization, decontamination, divestiture) and contract types (CPFF) awarded by comparable agencies.
What are the primary risk indicators associated with this Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract structure?
The primary risk indicator for a CPFF contract is the potential for cost overruns. While the fixed fee provides a ceiling on the contractor's profit, the government reimburses all allowable costs. This structure can incentivize contractors to incur higher costs if not meticulously managed, as it doesn't directly link their profit to cost savings. Effective oversight, detailed cost tracking, and robust auditing are crucial to mitigate this risk. Additionally, the complexity of services like explosives decontamination and demilitarization introduces inherent operational risks that require stringent safety protocols and experienced personnel.
How effective are the services delivered under this contract in achieving the Navy's industrial revitalization goals?
The effectiveness of the services delivered is contingent on the successful execution of tasks such as modernization, decontamination, and disposal. The contract's duration of over seven years suggests a long-term commitment to these revitalization efforts, implying a recognized need and potential for significant impact. Performance metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) within the contract, which are not publicly detailed, would be the primary measures of effectiveness. Regular reviews by the Navy's program office are essential to ensure that VSE Corporation is meeting its objectives, contributing to the Navy's modernization goals, and ensuring environmental compliance.
What are the historical spending patterns for industrial revitalization and hazardous material support services within the Department of the Navy?
Historical spending patterns for industrial revitalization and hazardous material support within the Department of the Navy are substantial and multifaceted. The Navy manages a vast inventory of aging infrastructure, legacy systems, and environmentally sensitive sites across numerous installations. Spending in this area typically includes contracts for environmental remediation (e.g., PFAS cleanup, soil and groundwater contamination), demolition and disposal of obsolete facilities, munitions response, and modernization of industrial plants. These contracts often span multiple years and can range from millions to hundreds of millions of dollars annually, depending on the scale of projects and regulatory requirements. This specific $15.5M contract represents a portion of that broader spending.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: N0017418R3001
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Contractor Details
Address: 6348 WALKER LANE, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22310
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $22,147,133
Exercised Options: $22,147,133
Current Obligation: $15,524,479
Actual Outlays: $93,505
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N0017804D4149
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2019-03-23
Current End Date: 2026-03-21
Potential End Date: 2026-03-21 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-11
More Contracts from VSE Corporation
- 200603!001420!2100!w15p7t!usa Communications-Electronics !daab0703db012 !A!N! !Y!0069 ! !20051230!20090130!049997380!049997380!049997380!n!vse Corporation !2550 Huntington AVE !alexandria !va!22303!01000!510!51!alexandria !alexandria (city) !virginia !+000030653370!n!n!000000000000!r414!systems Engineering Services !A7 !electronics and Communication Equip !000 !NOT Discernable !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!y!2!014!b! !C!N!Z! ! !n!b!n!n! ! !C! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $428.9M (Department of Defense)
- CR-2417, "PM Assured Mobility Systems (AMS) RG31 and RG33 Family of Vehicles (fov)contractor Logistics Support (CLS)" — $324.8M (Department of Defense)
- Task Order for PM AMS Contractor Logistic Support for Route Clearance Equipment. Theater of Operations Iraq and Afghanistan — $272.5M (Department of Defense)
- Hourly Labor of Mechanics, Painters and Other SCA Covered Labor Categories AT RED River Army Depot — $210.0M (Department of Defense)
- Siezed and Forfetited Assets — $194.3M (Department of the Treasury)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)