DoD awards $38.6M for Assembly Material to BAE Systems, raising concerns about limited competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $38,613,197 ($38.6M)

Contractor: BAE Systems Land & Armaments L.P.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2024-09-25

End Date: 2029-04-09

Contract Duration: 1,657 days

Daily Burn Rate: $23.3K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT

Sector: Defense

Official Description: ASSEMBLY MATERIAL

Place of Performance

Location: LOUISVILLE, JEFFERSON County, KENTUCKY, 40214

State: Kentucky Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $38.6 million to BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P. for work described as: ASSEMBLY MATERIAL Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $38.6 million for assembly material. 2. Sole awardee BAE Systems Land & Armaments L.P. indicates potential lack of competition. 3. Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment contract type introduces cost escalation risk. 4. Contract supports the Department of the Navy, likely for shipbuilding and repair.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $38.6 million for assembly material is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price is optimal compared to similar materials or alternative suppliers.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to BAE Systems. This limits price discovery and may result in higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition for a significant contract value could lead to inflated prices, directly impacting taxpayer funds.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying for essential assembly materials due to the absence of competitive bidding. The long contract duration (2024-2029) means potential cost overruns could accumulate over several years. Dependence on a single supplier for critical materials could pose supply chain risks.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Economic price adjustment clause
  • Long contract duration

Positive Signals

  • Supports critical defense needs
  • Established supplier relationship

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the shipbuilding and repair sector, a critical area for national defense. Spending benchmarks in this sector are often high due to specialized requirements and complex supply chains.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific provisions or considerations for small business participation in this contract. The award to a large prime contractor suggests limited direct opportunities for small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT COMPETED' status warrants further oversight to ensure the justification for a sole-source award is robust and that fair pricing was achieved through other means.

Related Government Programs

  • Ship Building and Repairing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for cost overruns due to economic price adjustment
  • Long contract duration
  • No indication of small business participation

Tags

ship-building-and-repairing, department-of-defense, ky, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $38.6 million to BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.. ASSEMBLY MATERIAL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $38.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-09-25. End: 2029-04-09.

What is the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and what steps were taken to ensure fair and reasonable pricing?

The justification for a sole-source award is crucial for understanding why competition was bypassed. Agencies typically require detailed documentation, such as a Justification and Approval (J&A), to support sole-source procurements. This documentation should outline the unique capabilities of the sole provider or the lack of viable alternatives. Furthermore, efforts to ensure fair and reasonable pricing might include historical price analysis, comparison to commercial item prices, or independent government cost estimates.

What is the potential financial exposure to the government given the 'FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT' contract type over its nearly five-year duration?

The 'FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT' (FPEPA) clause allows for price changes based on specific economic factors, such as inflation or material cost fluctuations. Over a 1657-day period (approximately 4.5 years), this exposes the government to potential cost increases beyond the initial fixed price. The magnitude of this risk depends on the specific economic indicators tied to the adjustment and the volatility of those indicators within the relevant market.

How does this contract align with the Department of the Navy's strategic goals for shipbuilding and repair, and are there alternative suppliers being developed?

Understanding the alignment with strategic goals helps contextualize the necessity of this specific procurement. If this material is critical for a particular class of vessels or a modernization effort, the sole-source award might be a temporary measure. However, proactive strategies should ideally involve identifying and developing alternative suppliers to foster competition and ensure long-term supply chain resilience and cost-effectiveness for future procurements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingShip and Boat BuildingShip Building and Repairing

Product/Service Code: SHIP AND MARINE EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: N0016723R0012

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Ball Corporation

Address: 4800 E RIVER RD, MINNEAPOLIS, MN, 55421

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $38,613,197

Exercised Options: $38,613,197

Current Obligation: $38,613,197

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 22

Total Subaward Amount: $13,865,721

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0016724D0004

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2024-09-25

Current End Date: 2029-04-09

Potential End Date: 2029-04-09 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-12-03

More Contracts from BAE Systems Land & Armaments L.P.

View all BAE Systems Land & Armaments L.P. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending