DoD's $15.6M Environmental Services Contract Awarded to C.J. Seto Support Services, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,584,812 ($15.6M)

Contractor: C.J. Seto Support Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2021-05-05

End Date: 2026-05-04

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: NON-PERSONAL SERVICES TO SUPPORT A RANGE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AND PROGRAM MGMT. SPECIFICALLY, IN THE AREAS OF SCIENTIFIC/ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND STUDIES, PROGRAM AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, TECHNICAL DATA SUPPORT, AND DATA MGMT SUPPORT.

Place of Performance

Location: CRANE, MARTIN County, INDIANA, 47522

State: Indiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $15.6 million to C.J. SETO SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC for work described as: NON-PERSONAL SERVICES TO SUPPORT A RANGE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AND PROGRAM MGMT. SPECIFICALLY, IN THE AREAS OF SCIENTIFIC/ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND STUDIES, PROGRAM AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, TECHNICAL DATA SUPPORT, AND DATA MGMT SUPPORT. Key points: 1. Contract supports environmental services, scientific analysis, and program management. 2. Awarded by the Department of the Navy, part of the Department of Defense. 3. Competition method was 'Full and Open', suggesting broad market access. 4. Contract type is 'Cost Plus Fixed Fee', which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $15.6M over 5 years is moderate. Pricing is based on a Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure, which requires close monitoring to ensure cost efficiency and prevent potential overruns.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows the government to select the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it aims to secure competitive pricing. However, the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure necessitates robust oversight to ensure value for money.

Public Impact

Supports critical environmental services for the Department of the Navy. Potential for scientific and engineering analysis to inform policy and operations. Contract duration of 5 years provides long-term stability for services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure carries inherent risk of cost escalation.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess effectiveness.
Small business participation is not indicated, potentially missing opportunities.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, promoting market access.
Contract supports essential environmental and program management functions.
Long contract duration offers service continuity.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330). Spending in this sector is substantial across government agencies, supporting a wide range of technical and analytical needs. Benchmarks vary widely based on specific services.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business (ss: false, sb: false). There is no specific set-aside for small businesses mentioned, suggesting that opportunities for small business participation may be limited in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded via a Delivery Order under a larger contract vehicle. Oversight will be critical to manage the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure, ensuring that costs are reasonable and fixed fees are justified by performance.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure
Potential for cost overruns
Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data
No indication of small business participation

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $15.6 million to C.J. SETO SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC. NON-PERSONAL SERVICES TO SUPPORT A RANGE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AND PROGRAM MGMT. SPECIFICALLY, IN THE AREAS OF SCIENTIFIC/ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND STUDIES, PROGRAM AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, TECHNICAL DATA SUPPORT, AND DATA MGMT SUPPORT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is C.J. SETO SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-05-05. End: 2026-05-04.

What specific environmental services are prioritized under this contract, and how do they align with current DoD environmental goals?

The contract broadly covers scientific/engineering analysis, program/technical support, and data management for environmental services. Specific priorities would depend on the task orders issued under this contract. Alignment with DoD goals requires examining the specific statements of work for each delivery order, focusing on areas like compliance, remediation, conservation, or climate adaptation initiatives.

How will the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure be managed to mitigate risks of cost overruns and ensure fair pricing?

Effective management of a CPFF contract requires rigorous cost tracking, regular audits, and clear performance metrics tied to the fixed fee. The government must actively monitor incurred costs against the estimate and ensure the contractor's efficiency. The fixed fee itself should be negotiated based on the complexity and risk of the work, and adjusted only if the scope significantly changes.

What mechanisms are in place to ensure the quality and effectiveness of the scientific and engineering analysis provided?

Quality assurance will likely rely on the government's technical representatives overseeing the contract. This includes reviewing deliverables, monitoring progress, and potentially conducting independent verification of analyses. Establishing clear acceptance criteria and performance standards within each delivery order is crucial for ensuring the effectiveness and reliability of the scientific and engineering outputs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N0016421R3002

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2300 KNOLL DR UNIT G, VENTURA, CA, 93003

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $21,848,277

Exercised Options: $21,041,126

Current Obligation: $15,584,812

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017819D7291

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline