DoD's $11.6M AN/SSQ-101 Sonobuoy Contract Awarded to ERAPSCO Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $11,661,506 ($11.7M)
Contractor: Erapsco
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-04-11
End Date: 2010-09-15
Contract Duration: 1,253 days
Daily Burn Rate: $9.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: AN/SSQ-101 SONOBUOY
Place of Performance
Location: COLUMBIA CITY, WHITLEY County, INDIANA, 46725
State: Indiana Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $11.7 million to ERAPSCO for work described as: AN/SSQ-101 SONOBUOY Key points: 1. The Department of the Navy awarded a $11.6 million contract for AN/SSQ-101 Sonobuoys. 2. ERAPSCO was the contractor, indicating potential market concentration in this specialized area. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive price discovery process. 4. The product falls under the Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $11.6 million for sonobuoys appears reasonable given the specialized nature of the equipment. Benchmarking against similar advanced acoustic detection systems would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' which implies a competitive process was used, but specific sources may have been excluded initially. This method generally promotes price discovery and value for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award mechanism likely ensured taxpayers received fair value for the $11.6 million expenditure on critical naval equipment.
Public Impact
Enhances naval capabilities for submarine detection and tracking. Supports maritime security operations and intelligence gathering. Contributes to the readiness of naval forces in various operational environments.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for limited competition if 'exclusion of sources' was restrictive.
- Long-term sustainment and upgrade costs not detailed.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Supports critical national defense functions.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the defense manufacturing sector, specifically focusing on advanced sonar and detection systems. Spending benchmarks in this niche area are difficult to establish without more granular data on similar sonobuoy systems.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to assess small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Navy, implying oversight by the Department of Defense. The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' clause suggests a structured procurement process.
Related Government Programs
- Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion.
- Technology obsolescence risk in a rapidly evolving field.
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown for long-term sustainment.
- Dependence on a single contractor (ERAPSCO) for this specific model.
Tags
search-detection-navigation-guidance-aer, department-of-defense, in, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $11.7 million to ERAPSCO. AN/SSQ-101 SONOBUOY
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ERAPSCO.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-04-11. End: 2010-09-15.
What was the specific rationale for excluding certain sources in the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' award?
The rationale for excluding specific sources under this procurement method typically relates to technical requirements, existing intellectual property, or previous performance issues. Understanding the exact reasons would clarify the extent of true competition and potential impacts on pricing and innovation.
What is the expected lifespan and obsolescence risk for the AN/SSQ-101 Sonobuoy?
The expected lifespan and obsolescence risk are critical factors for assessing the long-term value of this $11.6 million investment. Sonar technology evolves rapidly, and understanding the technological roadmap for these sonobuoys is essential to avoid acquiring systems that quickly become outdated, necessitating costly replacements.
How does the performance and cost of the AN/SSQ-101 compare to alternative or next-generation sonobuoy technologies?
A comparative analysis of the AN/SSQ-101's performance and cost against alternative systems, including emerging technologies, is crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of this procurement. This comparison would inform future acquisition decisions and ensure the Navy is investing in the most capable and cost-efficient solutions for its mission requirements.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Navigational, Measuring, Electromedical, and Control Instruments Manufacturing › Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: COMM/DETECT/COHERENT RADIATION
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: N0016406R6788
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2101 S 600 E, COLUMBIA CITY, IN, 03
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $11,661,506
Exercised Options: $11,661,506
Current Obligation: $11,661,506
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-04-11
Current End Date: 2010-09-15
Potential End Date: 2010-09-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2009-06-10
More Contracts from Erapsco
- FY23 Order for An/Ssq-53g (UK), An/Ssq-53g (ROK), An/Ssq-53g (bahrain), An/Ssq-62f (UK), An/Ssq-62f(rok), & An/Ssq-101b (UK) — $305.9M (Department of Defense)
- An/Ssq-53f Sonobuoy — $209.7M (Department of Defense)
- FY20 Production Sonobuoys Order — $204.6M (Department of Defense)
- An/Ssq-53g and An/Ssq-125 (FY21) — $181.4M (Department of Defense)
- (FY19) Production Sonobuoys — $175.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)