DoD Awards $81.8M Contract to Booz Allen Hamilton for Program Management Services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $81,821,324 ($81.8M)
Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-07-29
End Date: 2010-07-31
Contract Duration: 1,828 days
Daily Burn Rate: $44.8K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200512!450328!1700!N00140!FLEET AND INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CENT!N0014005C0088 !A!N! !Y! ! !20050729!20060731!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!00000! !SA!* !* !S ARABIA !+000009182413!N!N!000099998617!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541611!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !N!Z!B!U!U!1!001!N!4A!Z!Y!Z! ! !N!M!N! ! ! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! !Y!1710!N68870!0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $81.8 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: 200512!450328!1700!N00140!FLEET AND INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CENT!N0014005C0088 !A!N! !Y! ! !20050729!20060731!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!00000! !SA!* !* … Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single, well-known large business. 2. Services are in the Administrative Management and General Management Consulting sector. 3. High contract value suggests significant program scope. 4. Limited competition raises questions about cost-effectiveness.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $81.8M over approximately 5 years is substantial. Without specific performance metrics or benchmarks for similar program management services, a precise value assessment is difficult. However, the lack of competition suggests potential for overpricing.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was not available for competition, indicating a sole-source or limited competition award. This significantly restricts price discovery and may lead to higher costs for taxpayers compared to a fully competitive process.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition could result in higher costs for taxpayers, as there was no market pressure to drive down prices.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to limited competition. The contract supports critical program management functions within the Department of Defense. Long-term contract duration suggests ongoing need for these services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition
- Cost-plus contract type can incentivize spending
Positive Signals
- Award to established contractor
- Supports defense programs
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on the complexity and duration of the services required. Benchmarks are difficult without specific service details.
Small Business Impact
The award went to Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., a large business. There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this specific contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract type (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) requires careful oversight to ensure costs remain reasonable and aligned with program objectives. The Department of Defense's Contract Management Agency is responsible for oversight.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition may lead to higher costs.
- Cost-plus contract type can incentivize increased spending.
- Lack of performance data makes value assessment difficult.
- Long contract duration increases exposure to potential cost overruns.
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, va, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $81.8 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. 200512!450328!1700!N00140!FLEET AND INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CENT!N0014005C0088 !A!N! !Y! ! !20050729!20060731!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!00000! !SA!* !* !S ARABIA !+000009182413!N!N!000099998617!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541611!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !202
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $81.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-07-29. End: 2010-07-31.
What specific program management functions are being performed under this contract, and how do they align with DoD strategic goals?
The contract is for Program Management/Support Services within the 'FLEET AND INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CENT' for the Department of Defense. These services likely encompass planning, organizing, directing, and controlling resources to achieve specific program objectives related to fleet readiness and industrial supply chain operations. The alignment with strategic goals would depend on the specific programs supported, such as modernization efforts or operational readiness initiatives.
Given the limited competition, what mechanisms are in place to ensure cost control and prevent contractor overcharging?
While competition is limited, the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure requires robust oversight. The contracting agency must diligently monitor costs, ensure adherence to the fixed fee, and verify that all expenditures are reasonable, allocable, and necessary for contract performance. Performance metrics and regular audits are crucial to mitigate overcharging risks.
How does the performance of Booz Allen Hamilton on this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar program management services?
Assessing performance against industry benchmarks requires access to detailed performance data and specific metrics defined in the contract. Without this information, a direct comparison is not possible. However, the long duration and substantial value suggest a sustained need and likely satisfactory performance, though the lack of competitive pressure makes it harder to definitively gauge efficiency.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)
Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE, MCLEAN, VA, 22102
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-07-29
Current End Date: 2010-07-31
Potential End Date: 2010-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2017-05-04
More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (General Services Administration)
- Transformation Twenty-One Total Technology Next Generation (T4NG) Task Order - Benefits Integrated Delivery — $1.4B (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (General Services Administration)
- Product and Technology Ecosystem Management Services (ptems)which Includes Product Delivery and Lifecycle Management to Transform VA by Tapping Into Emerging Technologies, Connecting Developers With VA Data, and Making Human Centered Design (HCD) — $1.1B (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)