DoD awards $39.6M to L3Harris for Engineering Support, raising questions on competition and value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $39,595,864 ($39.6M)

Contractor: L3harris Technologies, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-03-08

End Date: 2014-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,667 days

Daily Burn Rate: $23.8K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: ENGINEERING AND DEPOT SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: MELBOURNE, BREVARD County, FLORIDA, 32902

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $39.6 million to L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for work described as: ENGINEERING AND DEPOT SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded to L3Harris Technologies, Inc. for $39.6M. 2. Services are for Engineering and Depot Support. 3. Contract was not competed, raising concerns about price discovery. 4. Sector context is Defense, specifically communications equipment manufacturing.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can incentivize cost overruns. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if the $39.6M represents fair value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition may result in inflated prices, impacting taxpayer funds negatively.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying due to the absence of competitive bidding. The Department of Defense relies on these services, making oversight crucial. Lack of transparency in the procurement process hinders public trust.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Cost-plus contract type
  • Limited transparency

Positive Signals

  • Essential support services for defense operations

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically supporting communications equipment manufacturing. Spending in this area is critical for national security, but competitive procurement is vital to ensure efficiency.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'not competed' status suggests potential weaknesses in oversight or justification for a sole-source award. Further review is needed to ensure accountability.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Communications Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Cost-plus contract type
  • Potential for overpricing
  • Lack of transparency in procurement

Tags

other-communications-equipment-manufactu, department-of-defense, fl, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $39.6 million to L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. ENGINEERING AND DEPOT SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $39.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-03-08. End: 2014-09-30.

What was the justification for not competing this significant contract?

The justification for not competing this $39.6M contract is not provided in the data. Typically, sole-source awards require a detailed justification, such as the unavailability of other sources or a critical need that cannot be met through competition. Without this information, it's impossible to assess the validity of the sole-source decision.

How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure impact potential cost savings?

A Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract allows the contractor to recover all allowable costs plus a predetermined fixed fee. While it provides flexibility, it can incentivize contractors to incur higher costs, as their fee remains constant. This structure, especially without competition, offers limited incentive for cost efficiency and can lead to higher overall spending compared to fixed-price contracts.

What is the long-term value proposition of this sole-source award?

The long-term value proposition of this sole-source award is questionable without competitive benchmarking. While L3Harris may provide essential services, the lack of competition prevents an objective assessment of whether taxpayers are receiving the best possible value. Future procurements should prioritize competition to ensure cost-effectiveness and innovation.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingCommunications Equipment ManufacturingOther Communications Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: N0003910R0013

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: L3harris Technologies, Inc (UEI: 004203337)

Address: 2400 PALM BAY RD NE, PALM BAY, FL, 32905

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $44,332,659

Exercised Options: $41,486,182

Current Obligation: $39,595,864

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2010-03-08

Current End Date: 2014-09-30

Potential End Date: 2014-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-11-03

More Contracts from L3harris Technologies, Inc.

View all L3harris Technologies, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending