DoD's $122.5M Engineering Services Contract Awarded to Anteon Corporation Raises Questions on Value and Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $12,249,215 ($12.2M)
Contractor: General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-11-18
End Date: 2010-09-30
Contract Duration: 1,777 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 200602!062009!1700!N00039!SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS !N0003906C0002 !A!N! !N! ! !20051118!20051231!067641597!067641597!099312725!N!ANTEON CORPORATION !3211 JERMANTOWN ROAD !FAIRFAX !VA!22030!66000!073!06!SAN DIEGO !SAN DIEGO !CALIFORNIA!+000000250000!N!N!000000000000!R414!SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541330!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!R!1!005!N!1B!Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!C!A!A!000!A!A!N! ! ! !Y!1700!N00039!0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: FAIRFAX, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22030
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $12.2 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: 200602!062009!1700!N00039!SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS !N0003906C0002 !A!N! !N! ! !20051118!20051231!067641597!067641597!099312725!N!ANTEON CORPORATION !3211 JERMANTOWN ROAD !FAIRFAX !VA!22030!66000!073!06!SAN DIEGO !SAN … Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Anteon Corporation for engineering services represents a significant expenditure of taxpayer funds. 2. Competition for this contract was limited, raising concerns about potential price inflation and reduced value. 3. The use of 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' suggests a non-standard procurement process. 4. The sector is Engineering Services, a critical area for defense operations, making efficient spending paramount.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract's Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure can incentivize cost overruns. Without detailed performance metrics and cost breakdowns, assessing the value for money is difficult compared to similar fixed-price or firm-fixed-price contracts.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating that while competition was sought, not all potential sources were included. This limited competition may have impacted the government's ability to secure the best possible price.
Taxpayer Impact: Limited competition can lead to higher prices than a fully open process, potentially resulting in increased costs for taxpayers.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be paying more than necessary due to limited competition. The effectiveness of engineering services provided under this contract is not clearly defined for public assessment. The Department of Defense's procurement practices are under scrutiny regarding fairness and cost-efficiency.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition
- Cost Plus Award Fee structure
- Lack of clear performance metrics for public review
Positive Signals
- Contract awarded to a specific entity for engineering services
- Potential for award fees to incentivize performance
Sector Analysis
Engineering services are crucial for the design, development, and maintenance of complex systems within the Department of Defense. Benchmarks for such services vary widely based on complexity and scope, but efficient procurement is key to maximizing defense capabilities.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication in the provided data that small businesses were significantly involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The procurement method 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' suggests a specific justification was made, but the details of oversight and accountability for the award fee structure and overall contract performance are not provided.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition may have inflated costs.
- Cost Plus Award Fee structure can incentivize overspending.
- Lack of transparency in source exclusion criteria.
- Unclear performance metrics for award fee determination.
- Potential for reduced value due to non-standard competition.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, va, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $12.2 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.. 200602!062009!1700!N00039!SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS !N0003906C0002 !A!N! !N! ! !20051118!20051231!067641597!067641597!099312725!N!ANTEON CORPORATION !3211 JERMANTOWN ROAD !FAIRFAX !VA!22030!66000!073!06!SAN DIEGO !SAN DIEGO !CALIFORNIA!+000000250000!N!N!000000000000!R414!SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541330!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $12.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-11-18. End: 2010-09-30.
What specific engineering services were provided under this contract, and how did they contribute to the Department of Defense's mission?
The contract was for 'SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES.' While crucial for defense operations, the specific tasks and their direct impact on mission success are not detailed in the provided data. Understanding the scope of these services is essential to evaluating the contract's overall value and effectiveness in supporting naval warfare systems.
What were the primary reasons for excluding certain sources from the competition, and did this exclusion lead to a higher contract price?
The data indicates 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' suggesting a deliberate decision to limit the pool of potential bidders. The specific rationale for these exclusions is not provided. However, limiting competition generally reduces price pressure, potentially leading to higher costs for the government and taxpayers compared to a fully open bidding process.
How effectively was the Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure utilized to ensure optimal performance and cost control for these engineering services?
The CPAF structure allows for base fees plus award fees based on performance. Without access to the specific performance metrics, award fee criteria, and the actual amounts paid in award fees, it is impossible to assess the effectiveness of this structure in driving performance or controlling costs for these engineering services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp (UEI: 001381284)
Address: 3211 JERMANTOWN ROAD, FAIRFAX, VA, 11
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-11-18
Current End Date: 2010-09-30
Potential End Date: 2010-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-05-17
More Contracts from General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
- Global Security Engineering&supply Chain Services — $1.5B (Department of State)
- THE Purpose of This Action IS to Establish a NEW Contract With General Dynamics Information Technology for Global Supply Chain Management, Logistics and Technology Development Services to Support the Department of State. the Initial Funding Associated With This Contract IS $22,304,578.00. the Overall Contract Value IS $2,200,000,000.00 — $1.2B (Department of State)
- Cloud Products&tools (CPT) — $902.0M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Beneficiary Contact Center Operations — $879.1M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Award of Task Order 47qfca210051-Nawcad Wolf Ship and AIR C5isr Systems Support — $832.3M (General Services Administration)
View all General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)