DoD Awards Booz Allen Hamilton $105.8M Engineering Services Contract via Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $105,860,364 ($105.9M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-08-29

End Date: 2005-02-28

Contract Duration: 549 days

Daily Burn Rate: $192.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Other

Place of Performance

Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $105.9 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: Key points: 1. Significant contract value of over $105 million awarded. 2. Full and open competition indicates a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. Contract duration of 549 days suggests a substantial project. 4. Awarded by the Department of Defense, a major federal agency.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee, which allows for performance-based incentives. The award amount of $105.8M is substantial, but without specific unit cost data or comparable contracts, a precise value assessment is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting multiple bidders were considered. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers likely received fair value, though the Cost Plus Award Fee structure requires careful oversight to manage costs.

Public Impact

Defense spending impacts national security capabilities. Engineering services are critical for complex defense projects. Contract awards can stimulate economic activity in the technology and engineering sectors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Cost Plus Award Fee contracts can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly.
  • Long contract duration may present risks if requirements change.

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition is a positive indicator of market engagement.
  • Award to a known entity like Booz Allen Hamilton suggests established capabilities.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a critical component of federal spending, particularly for the Department of Defense. Benchmarks for similar large-scale engineering service contracts can vary widely based on scope and complexity.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. The prime contractor is Booz Allen Hamilton, a large business, suggesting limited direct opportunities for small businesses unless they are subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The Cost Plus Award Fee contract type necessitates robust oversight from the Defense Contract Management Agency to ensure performance objectives are met and costs are controlled effectively.

Related Government Programs

  • Engineering Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns due to CPAF structure.
  • Lack of specific performance metrics makes detailed value assessment challenging.
  • Limited visibility into small business participation.
  • Contract duration could pose risks if requirements evolve.

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, va, definitive-contract, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $105.9 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $105.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-08-29. End: 2005-02-28.

What specific engineering services were procured under this contract, and how do they align with current DoD strategic priorities?

The contract is for general engineering services (NAICS 541330). Without further details, it's difficult to ascertain the specific services. However, engineering services for the DoD typically encompass a wide range, from systems engineering and technical assistance to design, development, and testing of military platforms and infrastructure, all crucial for maintaining and advancing national defense capabilities.

What were the key performance metrics and award fee criteria used to evaluate Booz Allen Hamilton's performance on this contract?

The contract is a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) type, meaning Booz Allen Hamilton's performance was evaluated against specific criteria to determine an award fee. These criteria are not detailed in the provided data but typically relate to technical execution, schedule adherence, cost control, and overall customer satisfaction. Effective oversight would involve clear, measurable metrics to ensure fair and objective evaluation.

How did the 'full and open competition' process ensure the best value was achieved for the taxpayer, given the CPAF contract structure?

Full and open competition is designed to solicit bids from all responsible sources, fostering a competitive environment that theoretically drives down prices and improves quality. For a CPAF contract, the competition likely focused on the proposed cost structure, the contractor's technical approach, and their ability to meet performance standards. The award fee mechanism then incentivizes performance beyond minimum requirements, aiming for best value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

Address: BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2003-08-29

Current End Date: 2005-02-28

Potential End Date: 2005-02-28 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2024-03-20

More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

View all Booz Allen Hamilton Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending