DoD Awards Booz Allen Hamilton $58.5M for Program Management Services, Ending in 2015
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $58,472,614 ($58.5M)
Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2003-05-08
End Date: 2015-06-30
Contract Duration: 4,436 days
Daily Burn Rate: $13.2K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 200308!032011!1700!D0211 !SPACE & NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS !N0003903C0013 !A!N! !N! !20030508!20040507!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !MC LEAN !VA!22102!03010!131!51!ARLINGTON !NORTHAMPTON !VIRGINIA !+000003642919!Y!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !N!Z!B!U!U!1!001!N!4A!Z!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !B!B!A!A!* !A!C!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $58.5 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: 200308!032011!1700!D0211 !SPACE & NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS !N0003903C0013 !A!N! !N! !20030508!20040507!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !MC LEAN !VA!22102!03010!131!51!ARLINGTON !NORTH… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton for program management and support services. 2. The contract value is substantial at $58.5 million, spanning over 12 years. 3. Competition was limited, with the contract type being 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION'. 4. The sector is Defense, specifically related to Naval Warfare Systems. 5. The contract's long duration and limited competition raise potential value concerns.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $58.5 million over 12 years suggests a high average annual spend. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, it's difficult to benchmark against similar program management contracts.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was not available for competition, indicating a sole-source or limited source award. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition for a significant contract value means taxpayers may not have received the best possible price.
Public Impact
Taxpayers funded a long-term contract for essential defense program management. The award impacts the defense sector, specifically naval warfare systems. Booz Allen Hamilton, a major contractor, received substantial funding. The extended period of performance suggests ongoing support needs for naval systems.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition
- Long contract duration
- Cost-plus contract type
Positive Signals
- Established contractor
- Essential services
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically for program management and support within the Department of Defense's Naval Warfare Systems. Spending in this area is critical for national security, but often involves complex, long-term engagements.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication in the provided data whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or partners in this contract. The awardee is a large corporation.
Oversight & Accountability
The data does not provide specific details on the oversight mechanisms for this contract. Given the long duration and limited competition, robust oversight would be crucial to ensure value and performance.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competition may lead to inflated costs.
- Long contract duration increases risk of cost escalation and changing requirements.
- Cost-plus contract type can incentivize spending rather than cost savings.
- Limited transparency on specific services and oversight mechanisms.
- Potential for vendor lock-in due to specialized knowledge.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, va, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $58.5 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. 200308!032011!1700!D0211 !SPACE & NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS !N0003903C0013 !A!N! !N! !20030508!20040507!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !MC LEAN !VA!22102!03010!131!51!ARLINGTON !NORTHAMPTON !VIRGINIA !+000003642919!Y!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $58.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-05-08. End: 2015-06-30.
What specific program management services were provided, and how did they contribute to the Naval Warfare Systems' effectiveness?
The data does not detail the specific program management services rendered. However, such services typically encompass planning, execution, monitoring, and control of complex projects, ensuring alignment with strategic objectives. For Naval Warfare Systems, this could involve managing research, development, acquisition, or sustainment of critical platforms and technologies, directly impacting operational readiness and technological superiority.
Given the 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status, what justification was provided for limiting the bidding process?
The provided data does not include the justification for the limited competition. Typically, such justifications are based on factors like unique capabilities of the contractor, urgent needs, or specific government requirements that only one source can fulfill. Without this information, it's impossible to assess the validity of the sole-source award and its potential impact on cost.
How was the 'COST PLUS FIXED FEE' pricing structure managed to ensure cost efficiency over the contract's 12-year duration?
The 'COST PLUS FIXED FEE' structure allows the contractor to recover costs plus a predetermined fee. Managing this over 12 years requires stringent cost tracking, auditing, and performance monitoring by the contracting agency. Regular reviews and potential adjustments to the fee or cost ceilings would be necessary to incentivize efficiency and prevent cost overruns, though the inherent nature of this contract type can lead to higher overall costs compared to fixed-price contracts.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)
Address: BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC, MC LEAN, VA, 22102
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $100,822,070
Exercised Options: $100,822,070
Current Obligation: $58,472,614
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-05-08
Current End Date: 2015-06-30
Potential End Date: 2015-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2017-05-04
More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (General Services Administration)
- Transformation Twenty-One Total Technology Next Generation (T4NG) Task Order - Benefits Integrated Delivery — $1.4B (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (General Services Administration)
- Product and Technology Ecosystem Management Services (ptems)which Includes Product Delivery and Lifecycle Management to Transform VA by Tapping Into Emerging Technologies, Connecting Developers With VA Data, and Making Human Centered Design (HCD) — $1.1B (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)