DoD's $13.1M contract for N4 training support awarded to Advanced Information Systems Group
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,113,246 ($13.1M)
Contractor: Advanced Information Systems Group, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-10-01
End Date: 2008-09-30
Contract Duration: 365 days
Daily Burn Rate: $35.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: TRAINING SUPPORT FOR N4.
Place of Performance
Location: ORLANDO, ORANGE County, FLORIDA, 32817
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.1 million to ADVANCED INFORMATION SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. for work described as: TRAINING SUPPORT FOR N4. Key points: 1. Contract value of $13.1M for a 1-year period. 2. Awarded under full and open competition. 3. No small business participation noted. 4. Engineering services sector, NAICS 541330.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $13.1M for one year of training support appears reasonable given the specialized nature of engineering services. Benchmarking against similar DoD training support contracts would provide a clearer picture of value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded using full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method allows multiple vendors to bid, theoretically leading to competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for this contract. The competitive nature of the award aims to ensure efficient use of these funds.
Public Impact
Ensures readiness and proficiency for Navy personnel through specialized training. Supports critical operational capabilities within the Department of the Navy. Potential for knowledge transfer and skill development within the defense sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of small business participation.
- Short contract duration (1 year) may limit long-term strategic planning.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type can shift risk to the contractor.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition promotes market efficiency.
- Clear statement of work for training support.
- Contract awarded to a single vendor, indicating potential specialization.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting training functions. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining military readiness and technological superiority, with benchmarks varying widely based on the specific service and duration.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates no small business participation in this contract. This suggests that the prime contractor, Advanced Information Systems Group, Inc., is likely a large business, and opportunities for small businesses were not leveraged in this specific award.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Navy is responsible for oversight of this contract. The firm fixed price structure implies performance standards are clearly defined, with accountability tied to meeting those specifications.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of small business subcontracting.
- Potential for contractor lock-in if training is highly specialized.
- Limited duration may necessitate future re-competition.
- Reliance on a single vendor for critical training support.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, fl, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.1 million to ADVANCED INFORMATION SYSTEMS GROUP, INC.. TRAINING SUPPORT FOR N4.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ADVANCED INFORMATION SYSTEMS GROUP, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-10-01. End: 2008-09-30.
What specific training outcomes were achieved under this contract, and how do they align with N4's mission objectives?
The contract aimed to provide training support for N4, likely encompassing technical, operational, or procedural training for personnel. Measuring the effectiveness would involve assessing improvements in personnel proficiency, mission accomplishment rates, and reduction in errors or incidents directly attributable to the training provided. Alignment with N4's objectives would be evident if the training directly contributed to enhanced operational capabilities or strategic goals.
Given the firm fixed price structure, what mechanisms were in place to ensure the quality and relevance of the training services provided?
A firm fixed price contract typically relies on a well-defined statement of work and clear performance metrics. Oversight likely involved regular progress reviews, acceptance testing of training materials and delivery, and performance evaluations by the contracting officer's representative. Quality assurance provisions within the contract would detail inspection and acceptance criteria, ensuring the training met specified standards and was relevant to the Navy's needs.
How did the full and open competition process ensure the most cost-effective solution for the government in acquiring these specialized engineering services?
Full and open competition allows multiple qualified vendors to submit proposals, fostering a competitive environment that typically drives down prices. The evaluation process would have assessed not only cost but also technical merit and past performance. By considering a broad range of potential contractors, the Department of the Navy aimed to secure the best value, balancing cost with the required expertise and quality for the training support services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 11315 CORPORATE BLVD, ORLANDO, FL, 90
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $13,224,858
Exercised Options: $13,224,858
Current Obligation: $13,113,246
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS23F0168M
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-10-01
Current End Date: 2008-09-30
Potential End Date: 2008-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-10-18
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)