Navy Awards $254M Contract to Electric Boat Corp. for Submarine Services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $25,430,373 ($25.4M)
Contractor: Electric Boat Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 1999-10-29
End Date: 2008-09-30
Contract Duration: 3,259 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.8K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED
Sector: Defense
Place of Performance
Location: GROTON, NEW LONDON County, CONNECTICUT, 06340
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $25.4 million to ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION for work described as: Key points: 1. The contract value is substantial at $254.3 million. 2. Electric Boat Corporation is a significant player in the defense sector. 3. The contract was not competed, raising potential concerns about price discovery. 4. The spending is within the defense sector, specifically for submarine services.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract was awarded in 1999 and completed in 2008. Without knowing the specific services rendered and comparing them to similar contracts from that era, it's difficult to definitively assess pricing. However, the lack of competition suggests potential for overpricing.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was sole-sourced, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. This method limits price discovery and can lead to higher costs for taxpayers as there is no competitive pressure to offer the best price.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition for this significant contract likely resulted in higher costs for taxpayers than if it had been competitively bid.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may have paid more due to the sole-source nature of the award. The long duration of the contract (over 9 years) suggests a significant ongoing need for these services. The Department of the Navy relies on Electric Boat Corporation for critical submarine services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 78 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of reported price benchmarks
- Long contract duration
Positive Signals
- Awarded to a known, established contractor
- Services likely critical to national defense
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the defense industrial base, specifically supporting submarine maintenance and operations. Spending in this sector is often characterized by long-term contracts and specialized capabilities, with significant taxpayer investment.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication in the provided data whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or partners in this contract. The sole-source nature of the award makes it less likely for small businesses to have had direct opportunities.
Oversight & Accountability
The data indicates the contract was awarded by the Department of the Navy. Oversight would typically involve contract management and performance monitoring by the Navy to ensure services were delivered as specified and within the agreed-upon terms.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award limits competition.
- Potential for inflated pricing due to lack of competition.
- Contract duration spans nearly a decade.
- Lack of detailed service description.
- No reported small business participation.
Tags
department-of-defense, ct, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $25.4 million to ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $25.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 1999-10-29. End: 2008-09-30.
What specific submarine services were provided under this contract, and how do they align with the Navy's operational needs?
The provided data does not specify the exact nature of the submarine services. However, given Electric Boat Corporation's role as a primary builder and servicer of US Navy submarines, these services likely encompassed maintenance, repair, modernization, or logistical support critical to the operational readiness of the submarine fleet.
What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis instead of through full and open competition?
Sole-source awards are typically justified when only one responsible source is available or capable of meeting the government's needs. For Electric Boat Corporation, this could be due to unique technical expertise, proprietary technology, or the specialized facilities required for complex submarine maintenance and construction, making competition impractical or impossible.
How did the final cost of this contract compare to initial estimates or projected costs, considering it was not competed?
Without access to the contract's detailed financial history and the initial cost estimates, it's impossible to determine the final cost's comparison. However, the absence of competition inherently removes a key mechanism for cost control, suggesting a higher likelihood of costs exceeding those achievable in a competitive bidding process.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED (NO)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp (UEI: 001381284)
Address: 75 EASTERN POINT RD, GROTON, CT, 02
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Timeline
Start Date: 1999-10-29
Current End Date: 2008-09-30
Potential End Date: 2008-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2008-10-20
More Contracts from Electric Boat Corporation
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Department of Defense)
- Columbia Class Design Completion — $24.5B (Department of Defense)
- SSN 792 Long Lead Time Material — $19.9B (Department of Defense)
- Construction of Virginia Class Block III Submarines — $16.2B (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $9.4B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)