DoD's $357M AEGIS Combat Systems R&D contract awarded to Johns Hopkins APL raises questions on competition and value
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $35,727,503 ($35.7M)
Contractor: THE Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2023-06-01
End Date: 2026-05-31
Contract Duration: 1,095 days
Daily Burn Rate: $32.6K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: AEGIS COMBAT SYSTEMS PROGRAM-BFC38
Place of Performance
Location: LAUREL, HOWARD County, MARYLAND, 20723
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $35.7 million to THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY LLC for work described as: AEGIS COMBAT SYSTEMS PROGRAM-BFC38 Key points: 1. Contract awarded via sole-source justification, limiting competitive pressure on pricing. 2. Significant investment in R&D for a critical defense system. 3. Long-term contract duration (1095 days) suggests ongoing research needs. 4. Performance-based contract type (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) may incentivize cost control. 5. Focus on advanced research and development in physical, engineering, and life sciences. 6. Geographic concentration of work in Maryland.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract's value is difficult to benchmark without comparable sole-source R&D awards for similar complex systems. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure aims to control costs by setting a fixed fee on top of allowable costs, but it can still lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly. The total obligated amount of $357.3M over three years warrants scrutiny to ensure efficient use of taxpayer funds, especially given the lack of competitive bidding.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded using a sole-source justification, meaning it was not competed. The Department of the Navy identified The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC as the only responsible source capable of performing the research and development for the AEGIS Combat Systems Program. This lack of competition means that pricing and innovation may not have been driven by market forces.
Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards limit opportunities for other businesses to compete for government contracts, potentially leading to higher costs for taxpayers due to the absence of competitive pressure.
Public Impact
Benefits the Department of Defense by advancing the capabilities of the AEGIS Combat System, a critical naval defense platform. Delivers advanced research and development services essential for maintaining technological superiority in naval warfare. Geographic impact is concentrated in Maryland, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications include highly skilled researchers and engineers in specialized scientific fields.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits price discovery and potential cost savings.
- CPFF contract type can incentivize cost escalation if not rigorously monitored.
- Long contract duration requires sustained oversight to ensure continued value.
- Lack of transparency in the sole-source justification process.
Positive Signals
- Award to a reputable institution (JHU APL) with a strong track record in defense R&D.
- CPFF structure includes a fixed fee, providing some cost predictability.
- Focus on critical national security technology (AEGIS Combat Systems).
- Contract supports ongoing research and development, crucial for modernization.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on physical, engineering, and life sciences. The AEGIS Combat System is a cornerstone of U.S. naval defense, representing a significant investment in advanced military technology. Comparable spending in defense R&D is substantial, with billions allocated annually across various branches for system modernization and innovation. This contract's value is significant within the specialized niche of naval combat systems R&D.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, nor is there information suggesting significant subcontracting opportunities for small businesses. The nature of advanced R&D for complex defense systems often involves specialized expertise that may not be readily available from small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if any subcontracting plans exist.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure necessitates close monitoring of incurred costs and the contractor's performance against research objectives. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature, but contract performance reviews and financial audits are standard oversight mechanisms. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- AEGIS Combat System Modernization
- Naval Surface Warfare
- Defense Research and Development
- Advanced Weapon Systems
- Applied Physics Research
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
- Long contract duration
- Lack of competitive bidding
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, research-and-development, sole-source, cost-plus-fixed-fee, complex-systems, aegis-combat-systems, maryland, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $35.7 million to THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY LLC. AEGIS COMBAT SYSTEMS PROGRAM-BFC38
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $35.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-06-01. End: 2026-05-31.
What is the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis to The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC?
The provided data indicates a sole-source award, suggesting that the Department of the Navy determined The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC to be the only responsible source capable of meeting the government's requirements for the AEGIS Combat Systems Program. This is often due to unique capabilities, proprietary knowledge, or critical infrastructure possessed by the contractor that cannot be replicated by others. A detailed justification document, typically required for sole-source procurements, would outline the specific technical, programmatic, or institutional reasons necessitating this approach. Without access to that document, the precise rationale remains speculative, but it implies a high degree of specialization and essential expertise held by JHU APL for this particular program.
How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type influence cost control and contractor incentives for this R&D effort?
The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type is commonly used for research and development where the scope of work may evolve or is not precisely defined at the outset. In a CPFF contract, the contractor is reimbursed for all allowable costs incurred, plus a predetermined fixed fee representing profit. This structure incentivizes the contractor to control costs because the fee remains constant regardless of the final cost. However, it also places a significant burden on the government to meticulously audit and approve all incurred costs to prevent overruns. For this AEGIS R&D contract, JHU APL is motivated to complete the work efficiently to maximize their return on the fixed fee, but the government must maintain robust oversight to ensure costs remain reasonable and necessary for achieving the research objectives.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or milestones used to measure the success of this R&D contract?
While specific KPIs and milestones are not detailed in the provided data, R&D contracts of this nature typically include a series of technical and programmatic benchmarks. These could involve the successful development and testing of specific system components, the achievement of defined performance parameters (e.g., speed, accuracy, reliability), the delivery of research reports and analyses, and the successful integration of new technologies into the AEGIS Combat System architecture. Progress is often tracked through regular technical reviews, demonstrations, and formal acceptance of deliverables. The government's contracting officer and technical representatives would monitor adherence to these milestones to ensure the contractor is progressing effectively towards the program's research goals and to justify continued funding.
What is the historical spending trend for the AEGIS Combat Systems Program, and how does this $357M award compare?
The provided data focuses on a single contract award of $357.3 million. To understand the historical spending trend for the AEGIS Combat Systems Program, one would need to examine cumulative obligations over multiple fiscal years for all related contracts. The AEGIS system is a long-standing and continuously evolving program, implying significant historical investment. This $357M award represents a substantial single investment within a given period (2023-2026). Without broader historical data, it's challenging to definitively state if this award is higher or lower than previous trends, but it underscores the ongoing significant financial commitment to the program's research and development.
What are the potential risks associated with a long-duration (1095 days) sole-source R&D contract like this one?
Long-duration sole-source R&D contracts present several potential risks. Firstly, the lack of competition over an extended period can lead to complacency and reduced pressure on the contractor to innovate or optimize costs. Secondly, the government's commitment to a single provider for an extended duration can create vendor lock-in, making it difficult and costly to switch providers if performance issues arise or if market conditions change. Thirdly, the evolving nature of R&D means that the initial requirements might become outdated, and adapting the contract to new directions can be complex and costly. Finally, without regular competitive re-evaluation, there's a risk that the contractor's pricing or performance may drift from optimal value over time, necessitating robust and continuous government oversight.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › C – National Defense R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 11100 JOHNS HOPKINS RD, LAUREL, MD, 20723
Business Categories: Category Business, Educational Institution, Higher Education, Limited Liability Corporation, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Higher Education (Private)
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $36,001,910
Exercised Options: $36,001,910
Current Obligation: $35,727,503
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 2
Total Subaward Amount: $152,524
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N0002422D6404
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-06-01
Current End Date: 2026-05-31
Potential End Date: 2026-05-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-22
More Contracts from THE Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC
- Dragonfly Extended Phase B Mission Under 80msfc20d0004 Aerospace Research, Development and Engineering Support (ardes) II — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Aerospace Research, Design, and Development Tasks for Nasa — $1.1B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Solar Probe Plus (SPP) Phase a Activities the Contractor Shall Perform the Work That IS Designated in Task Orders Issued by the Contracting Officer. the Overall Scope of Work to BE Performed Will Support ALL of Nasa's Mission Directorates. These Efforts CAN BE Characterized AS Aerospace Research, Development, and Engineering Support (ardes). the General Nature of the Tasks to BE Developed Will BE to Conduct Supporting Research and Advanced Technology Development Designed to Make Contributions to Space Science and Space Exploration and Assist Nasa in the Formulation and Execution of ITS Programs by Providing Nasa With Technical Advice, Studies, and Reports of Investigations. Efforts Undertaken by the Contractor, in the Performance of the Assigned Tasks, Which Include Technology Transfer, Partnering and Commercialization Activities, Shall Seek to Enhance the Value and Contribution of Technology to the Nation S Technological Competitiveness, Prosperity, Quality of Life, and Other National Priorities. Individual Task Orders Will Fall Within ONE of TWO Broad Categories: 1) Essential Research Capability of Space Systems Engineering, and Related Work in the Supporting Essential Research Capabilities of Systems Test and Evaluation, Information Technology, and Simulation, Modeling and Operations Analysis. Task Orders Within the Category of Essential Research Capabilities ARE Intended to Preserve the Nation S Capabilities to Perform Robotic Space Missions Over the Full Mission Life Cycle From Concept Formulation Through Mission Operations and Data Analysis. Nasa IS Contracting for Support in Several KEY Research, Engineering and Development Competencies That ARE Fundamental to the Performance of These Missions. 2) Other Aerospace Research, Development, and Engineering Support. Task Orders Within the Category of Other Aerospace Research, Development and Engineering Support ARE Intended to Include a Broad Base of Scientific and Technical Capabilities Relevant to Nasa Program Responsibilities and Assignments. Regardless of Category, Task Orders MAY BE Issued Related to Autonomous Deep-Space and Earth-Orbiting Spacecraft or Major Subsystems, Experiments, Instruments or Other Devices That MAY BE Carried AS Payloads on the Space Shuttle or on Other Spacecraft. Task Assignments Will Explicitly Describe a Broad Range of Hardware, Software, Systems Engineering, Scientific Analysis, and Management Efforts Including Program and Project Management and Administration — $894.5M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- SUN Earth Connection Living With a Star Program Letter Contract — $522.1M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Interstellar Mapping and Acceleration Probe (imap) Phase CD — $400.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
View all THE Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)