DoD awards $247M contract for RAM Design Agent services to Raytheon Company
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $246,799,079 ($246.8M)
Contractor: Raytheon Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2018-07-20
End Date: 2026-12-31
Contract Duration: 3,086 days
Daily Burn Rate: $80.0K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: RAM DESIGN AGENT
Place of Performance
Location: TUCSON, PIMA County, ARIZONA, 85756
State: Arizona Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $246.8 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY for work described as: RAM DESIGN AGENT Key points: 1. Contract value of $247M for engineering services. 2. Raytheon Company is the sole awardee. 3. Contract duration extends to December 2026. 4. Services fall under engineering (NAICS 541330).
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. The benchmark for similar engineering services contracts is not readily available, making a direct comparison difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, indicating a lack of competition. This method may not result in the most favorable pricing for taxpayers.
Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition for a significant contract value raises concerns about potential overspending and reduced value for taxpayer funds.
Public Impact
Significant taxpayer investment in defense engineering services. Potential for cost escalation due to sole-source, CPFF contract. Impact on defense readiness and technological advancement. Limited transparency on pricing due to lack of competition.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
- Long contract duration
- Lack of competition
Positive Signals
- Awarded to a major defense contractor
- Supports critical defense needs
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the defense sector, specifically for engineering services. Spending in this area is substantial, driven by national security requirements and technological development. Benchmarks for sole-source engineering contracts are difficult to establish due to their unique nature.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this sole-source award. The contract was awarded directly to Raytheon Company, a large prime contractor, limiting opportunities for small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight is crucial for sole-source, Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts to ensure cost control and performance. The Defense Contract Management Agency is responsible for this contract, but the inherent nature of the award warrants close scrutiny of expenditures and deliverables.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award limits competition and potentially increases costs.
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type carries inherent risk of cost overruns.
- Long contract duration (over 8 years) increases exposure to changing requirements and market conditions.
- Lack of transparency on specific services provided.
- No indication of small business subcontracting opportunities.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, az, definitive-contract, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $246.8 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY. RAM DESIGN AGENT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is RAYTHEON COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $246.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2018-07-20. End: 2026-12-31.
What specific engineering services are being provided under this contract, and how do they directly contribute to national security objectives?
The contract is for 'RAM DESIGN AGENT' services, which likely pertains to the design and development of critical systems or components within defense platforms. While the exact nature is not detailed, such services are fundamental to maintaining and advancing military technological superiority and operational readiness, directly supporting national security objectives by ensuring the functionality and effectiveness of defense assets.
Given the sole-source nature and CPFF structure, what mechanisms are in place to mitigate cost overruns and ensure fair pricing?
Mitigation strategies for sole-source CPFF contracts typically involve stringent oversight, detailed cost audits, and performance-based incentives where possible. The Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) would be responsible for monitoring expenditures, validating costs, and ensuring the contractor meets performance milestones. However, the inherent lack of competition limits the primary price discovery mechanism, making robust oversight paramount.
How will the effectiveness of the 'RAM DESIGN AGENT' services be measured, and what are the key performance indicators (KPIs)?
Effectiveness is typically measured against predefined technical specifications, performance requirements, and delivery schedules outlined in the contract. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) might include adherence to design standards, successful integration of components, timely completion of design phases, and achievement of specified performance metrics for the systems being designed. The contracting officer's representative (COR) would monitor these KPIs.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: MODIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT › MODIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: N0002417R5431
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Rockwell Collins Australia PTY Limited
Address: 1151 E HERMANS RD, TUCSON, AZ, 85756
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $301,743,278
Exercised Options: $301,743,278
Current Obligation: $246,799,079
Actual Outlays: $14,976,265
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 150
Total Subaward Amount: $24,049,138
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2018-07-20
Current End Date: 2026-12-31
Potential End Date: 2026-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-08
More Contracts from Raytheon Company
- Federal Contract — $5.7B (Department of Defense)
- TEN Fire Units for Qatar — $5.6B (Department of Defense)
- GPS Advanced Control Segment (OCX) Phase B Blocks 1 and 2 — $4.5B (Department of Defense)
- An/Spy-6(v) Hardware Production — $3.3B (Department of Defense)
- Predominant - Patriot UAE — $3.0B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)