Navy Awards $34.6M Contract for LHA 7 Fitting Out Availability to National Steel and Shipbuilding
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $34,642,780 ($34.6M)
Contractor: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2018-04-06
End Date: 2022-02-28
Contract Duration: 1,424 days
Daily Burn Rate: $24.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: LHA 7 FITTING OUT AVAILABILITY - SCN
Place of Performance
Location: SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92128
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $34.6 million to NATIONAL STEEL AND SHIPBUILDING COMPANY for work described as: LHA 7 FITTING OUT AVAILABILITY - SCN Key points: 1. The contract value is $34.6 million, awarded to National Steel and Shipbuilding Company. 2. This award falls under the Ship Building and Repairing sector (NAICS 336611). 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF), indicating potential for performance-based incentives. 4. The duration of the contract is 1424 days, spanning from April 2018 to February 2022.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure allows for flexibility but requires careful monitoring to ensure costs remain reasonable and performance targets are met. Without specific award fee criteria, it's difficult to assess the true value realization.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. However, the specific pricing mechanisms within the CPAF structure need scrutiny to ensure competitive pricing was achieved.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for this contract. The CPAF structure necessitates oversight to ensure cost efficiency and value for money.
Public Impact
Supports naval shipbuilding capabilities and readiness. Contributes to the industrial base for shipbuilding and repair. Ensures the operational readiness of naval vessels.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly.
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes it hard to gauge award fee effectiveness.
- Long contract duration requires sustained oversight.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Supports critical defense infrastructure.
- Contract aims to ensure vessel readiness.
Sector Analysis
This contract is within the shipbuilding and repair sector, which is crucial for national defense. Spending benchmarks in this sector can vary significantly based on vessel type and complexity.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. Large shipbuilding contracts often involve complex supply chains where small businesses may participate as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The Cost Plus Award Fee contract type requires robust oversight from the Department of the Navy to ensure performance standards are met and costs are controlled. Regular reviews of award fee determinations are essential.
Related Government Programs
- Ship Building and Repairing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPAF structure.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics for award fee assessment.
- Long contract duration requires sustained oversight.
- No indication of small business participation.
Tags
ship-building-and-repairing, department-of-defense, ca, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $34.6 million to NATIONAL STEEL AND SHIPBUILDING COMPANY. LHA 7 FITTING OUT AVAILABILITY - SCN
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NATIONAL STEEL AND SHIPBUILDING COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $34.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2018-04-06. End: 2022-02-28.
What were the specific award fee criteria and how were they applied to ensure fair and effective performance incentives?
The specific award fee criteria are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, these criteria would relate to schedule adherence, quality of work, cost control, and technical performance. Effective application requires clear, measurable metrics and objective evaluations by the contracting officer to ensure the contractor is incentivized for superior performance without encouraging unnecessary cost escalation.
How does the Cost Plus Award Fee structure compare to other contract types for similar naval fitting out availabilities in terms of cost control and risk mitigation?
CPAF offers more flexibility than fixed-price contracts but carries higher cost risk for the government compared to fixed-price incentives. It aims to balance cost control with performance incentives, unlike cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) which offers less incentive for efficiency. For complex, uncertain projects like fitting out availabilities, CPAF can be appropriate if managed with stringent oversight and well-defined award criteria to mitigate risks.
What is the historical performance data for National Steel and Shipbuilding Company on similar naval contracts, and how does it inform the risk assessment for this award?
Historical performance data for National Steel and Shipbuilding Company on similar contracts would be crucial for a comprehensive risk assessment. Without it, it's difficult to gauge their track record regarding cost overruns, schedule delays, or quality issues. Past performance evaluations by the government would provide insights into their reliability and efficiency, informing the level of oversight required for this specific contract.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Ship and Boat Building › Ship Building and Repairing
Product/Service Code: SHIPS, SMALL CRAFT, PONTOON, DOCKS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: N0002417R2472
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2798 HARBOR DR, SAN DIEGO, CA, 92113
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $45,638,671
Exercised Options: $44,549,326
Current Obligation: $34,642,780
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 223
Total Subaward Amount: $2,775,741,312
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2018-04-06
Current End Date: 2022-02-28
Potential End Date: 2022-02-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-05-07
More Contracts from National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
- Federal Contract — $5.9B (Department of Defense)
- Detail Design and Construction (DD&C) for T-AO 205 — $5.8B (Department of Defense)
- T-AO 214 - 221 DD&C Block BUY — $2.5B (Department of Defense)
- MLP System Design Part 1 (SD1) With Priced Option for SD2 — $2.0B (Department of Defense)
- Expeditionary SEA Base (ESB) Hull 6 Lltm UCA — $1.9B (Department of Defense)
View all National Steel and Shipbuilding Company federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)