DoD's $40M Naval Reactors Contract with Huntington Ingalls Faces Scrutiny for Lack of Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $40,060,705 ($40.1M)
Contractor: Huntington Ingalls Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2016-10-01
End Date: 2023-03-31
Contract Duration: 2,372 days
Daily Burn Rate: $16.9K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: NAVAL REACTORS
Place of Performance
Location: NEWPORT NEWS, NEWPORT NEWS CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23607
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $40.1 million to HUNTINGTON INGALLS INC for work described as: NAVAL REACTORS Key points: 1. Significant spending on power boiler and heat exchanger manufacturing for naval applications. 2. Sole reliance on Huntington Ingalls Inc. raises questions about competitive pricing. 3. The contract's long duration and cost-plus structure may increase financial risk. 4. Limited transparency in pricing mechanisms for this specialized sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The $40 million awarded to Huntington Ingalls Inc. for power boiler and heat exchanger manufacturing lacks clear benchmarks due to its specialized nature and sole-source award. Without competitive bids, assessing fair pricing is difficult, suggesting potential overpayment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, indicating a lack of competition. This significantly limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers as there are no competing offers to drive down the price.
Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition in this sole-source contract likely results in higher costs for taxpayers compared to a competitively bid scenario.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be overpaying for critical naval components due to the lack of competitive bidding. The long-term nature of the contract raises concerns about sustained cost-effectiveness. Dependence on a single supplier could create vulnerabilities in the supply chain for essential defense equipment.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award
- Cost-plus contract type
- Lack of competition
- Long contract duration
Positive Signals
- Essential defense procurement
- Specialized manufacturing capability
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Power Boiler and Heat Exchanger Manufacturing sector, crucial for naval propulsion systems. Spending in this niche area is often characterized by high barriers to entry and specialized expertise, potentially limiting competition.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates no specific provisions or set-asides for small businesses in this contract. The nature of the work, involving large-scale naval components, typically favors larger, established prime contractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The sole-source nature of this contract warrants close oversight to ensure fair pricing and prevent potential cost overruns. Accountability mechanisms should be robust given the lack of competitive pressure.
Related Government Programs
- Power Boiler and Heat Exchanger Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competition
- Sole-source award
- Cost-plus contract type
- Potential for cost overruns
- Limited transparency in pricing
- Long contract duration
Tags
power-boiler-and-heat-exchanger-manufact, department-of-defense, va, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $40.1 million to HUNTINGTON INGALLS INC. NAVAL REACTORS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is HUNTINGTON INGALLS INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $40.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2016-10-01. End: 2023-03-31.
What is the justification for the sole-source award, and how does the Navy ensure fair and reasonable pricing without competition?
The justification for a sole-source award typically rests on unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or urgent needs that only one contractor can meet. The Navy would likely rely on detailed cost analyses, historical pricing data for similar components (if available), and potentially independent cost estimates to ensure fair and reasonable pricing. However, without competitive bids, the assurance of optimal value is inherently reduced.
What are the risks associated with a long-term, cost-plus fixed fee contract for specialized defense manufacturing?
Long-term, cost-plus fixed fee contracts in specialized defense manufacturing carry risks of cost overruns, as the contractor is incentivized to incur costs to achieve the fixed fee. Scope creep can inflate expenses, and the lack of competitive pressure may reduce efficiency. For taxpayers, the primary risk is paying more than necessary for the goods or services, especially if the fixed fee is not adequately calibrated against market rates or performance.
How effective is this contract in ensuring the timely delivery of critical naval components, and what is the potential impact of supplier dependency?
The effectiveness in timely delivery depends on the contractor's performance history and the specific terms of the contract. However, sole-source dependency creates a significant risk. Any disruption at Huntington Ingalls Inc. could severely impact naval readiness. This reliance limits the government's leverage in negotiations and could lead to extended lead times or supply chain vulnerabilities if the sole provider faces operational challenges.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Boiler, Tank, and Shipping Container Manufacturing › Power Boiler and Heat Exchanger Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: FURNACE/STEAM/DRYING; NUCL REACTOR
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: N0002416R2103
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc (UEI: 967362331)
Address: 4101 WASHINGTON AVE, NEWPORT NEWS, VA, 23607
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $45,244,079
Exercised Options: $45,244,079
Current Obligation: $40,060,705
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 1
Total Subaward Amount: $87,000
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2016-10-01
Current End Date: 2023-03-31
Potential End Date: 2023-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-09-30
More Contracts from Huntington Ingalls Inc
- CVN 80 Engineering Efforts and Steel — $11.9B (Department of Defense)
- CVN 78 Ship Construction — $6.6B (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $4.6B (Department of Defense)
- CVN79 Construction Preparation Efforts FY09 — $4.5B (Department of Defense)
- Detail Design and Construction CVN 79 — $4.5B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)