DoD's $187M Raytheon Contract for Missile Parts Lacks Competition, Raises Cost Concerns

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $186,984,894 ($187.0M)

Contractor: Raytheon Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2016-06-30

End Date: 2023-03-31

Contract Duration: 2,465 days

Daily Burn Rate: $75.9K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: FY16-20 BLK 1 DESIGN AGENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: TUCSON, PIMA County, ARIZONA, 85756

State: Arizona Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $187.0 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY for work described as: FY16-20 BLK 1 DESIGN AGENT SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Significant spending on specialized missile parts over 7 years. 2. Sole-source award to Raytheon Company limits price discovery. 3. Potential for inflated costs due to lack of competition. 4. Contract falls under 'Other Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts' manufacturing sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's total value of $187M over 7 years is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if the pricing is fair compared to market rates or similar government contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only one vendor, Raytheon Company, was solicited. This significantly limits price discovery and competition, potentially leading to higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition in this sole-source award may result in taxpayers paying a premium for these specialized missile parts.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying for critical defense components. Lack of transparency in pricing due to sole-source nature. Potential impact on defense readiness if costs divert funds from other priorities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 75 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for cost overruns

Positive Signals

  • Long-term contract provides stability
  • Supports critical defense manufacturing

Sector Analysis

This contract is within the 'Other Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector. Spending in this niche area is often characterized by high R&D costs and limited suppliers, making competitive bidding challenging but crucial.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates no specific set-aside for small businesses, and the prime contractor is Raytheon Company, a large business. There is no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this contract warrants close oversight to ensure pricing remains reasonable and that the government is receiving good value. Regular audits and performance reviews are essential.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competition.
  • Potential for cost overruns due to lack of price discovery.
  • High contract value warrants close scrutiny.
  • Lack of small business participation noted.

Tags

other-guided-missile-and-space-vehicle-p, department-of-defense, az, definitive-contract, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $187.0 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY. FY16-20 BLK 1 DESIGN AGENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RAYTHEON COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $187.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-06-30. End: 2023-03-31.

What is the justification for the sole-source award, and has it been reviewed for potential competition?

The justification for a sole-source award is critical for understanding why competition was not pursued. Agencies must provide detailed reasons, such as unique capabilities or urgent needs. A review of this justification is necessary to determine if alternative sources could have been identified or if the sole-source status is still warranted.

How are cost controls and price reasonableness being managed in this sole-source contract?

Given the absence of competition, robust cost control mechanisms are paramount. This includes detailed cost analysis, regular audits of contractor expenses, and benchmarking against industry standards where possible. The government should actively negotiate pricing and ensure transparency in the contractor's cost structure.

What is the long-term strategy for acquiring these missile parts, and will future procurements include competitive elements?

Understanding the long-term acquisition strategy is vital. If these parts are critical and likely to be needed for an extended period, the Department of Defense should explore options to foster competition in future contract awards. This could involve market research, encouraging new entrants, or breaking down the requirement into smaller, more competitive lots.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: GUIDED MISSLES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: N0002415R5433

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Rockwell Collins Australia PTY Limited

Address: 1151 E HERMANS RD, TUCSON, AZ, 85756

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $198,782,711

Exercised Options: $196,864,727

Current Obligation: $186,984,894

Actual Outlays: $5,852,764

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 127

Total Subaward Amount: $71,176,068

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2016-06-30

Current End Date: 2023-03-31

Potential End Date: 2023-03-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-08-22

More Contracts from Raytheon Company

View all Raytheon Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending