DoD awards $215M non-nuclear submarine repair contract to Electric Boat Corp
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $214,835,473 ($214.8M)
Contractor: Electric Boat Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2012-12-16
End Date: 2017-12-06
Contract Duration: 1,816 days
Daily Burn Rate: $118.3K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: NON NUCLEAR SUBMARINE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE SERVICES CONTRACT
Place of Performance
Location: GROTON, NEW LONDON County, CONNECTICUT, 06340
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $214.8 million to ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION for work described as: NON NUCLEAR SUBMARINE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE SERVICES CONTRACT Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single, established provider for specialized submarine maintenance. 2. Significant value suggests critical, long-term support for naval assets. 3. Lack of competition raises questions about potential price overruns and innovation. 4. Sector focus on naval shipbuilding and repair highlights specialized industrial base needs.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract's cost-plus-fixed-fee structure, combined with a lack of competition, makes a definitive value assessment difficult. Without benchmarks from competing bids, it's hard to determine if the $215M represents a fair price for the services rendered.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This approach limits price discovery and may prevent the government from benefiting from competitive market forces that could drive down costs or encourage innovative solutions.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition for this substantial contract may result in higher costs for taxpayers than if multiple vendors had vied for the work.
Public Impact
Ensures continued operational readiness of critical naval assets. Supports a highly specialized industrial base and skilled workforce. Potential for cost savings through future competitive procurements in this niche. Impacts the strategic capabilities of the U.S. Navy's submarine fleet.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Cost-plus contract type
- Long contract duration
Positive Signals
- Ensures critical maintenance for naval assets
- Supports specialized industry
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the naval shipbuilding and repair sector, a highly specialized area requiring unique expertise and facilities. Spending in this sector is often characterized by long lead times, high R&D costs, and limited competition due to the complexity and criticality of the assets.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses. The specialized nature of submarine repair typically requires large, established firms with significant infrastructure and security clearances, often excluding smaller entities.
Oversight & Accountability
The sole-source nature of this award warrants close oversight to ensure costs are reasonable and performance meets all requirements. Robust auditing and performance monitoring are crucial to mitigate risks associated with non-competitive contracts.
Related Government Programs
- Ship Building and Repairing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competition
- Cost-plus contract type
- Potential for cost overruns
- Limited innovation incentives
- High contract value
Tags
ship-building-and-repairing, department-of-defense, ct, definitive-contract, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $214.8 million to ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION. NON NUCLEAR SUBMARINE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE SERVICES CONTRACT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $214.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2012-12-16. End: 2017-12-06.
What was the justification for awarding this contract sole-source, and were alternative competition strategies considered?
The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, critical national security needs, or the unavailability of other sources. Without specific documentation, it's difficult to ascertain the exact rationale. However, the specialized nature of non-nuclear submarine repair might necessitate a single provider due to proprietary technology, extensive training, or specific shipyard infrastructure required.
How does the cost-plus-fixed-fee structure impact the government's ability to control costs in this non-competitive environment?
The cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) structure allows the contractor to recover all allowable costs plus a predetermined fixed fee. In a non-competitive scenario, this can increase risk for the government, as the contractor has less incentive to control costs aggressively. The fixed fee, however, provides some predictability in contractor profit, but overall project cost can still escalate if direct costs are not managed effectively.
What are the long-term implications for naval readiness and technological advancement given the lack of competition for these repair services?
The long-term implications include potential stagnation in innovation and efficiency if the incumbent contractor faces no competitive pressure. While ensuring immediate readiness, a sustained lack of competition could lead to higher long-term maintenance costs and slower adoption of new repair technologies. Future competitive procurements, if feasible, would be crucial to reintroduce market dynamics.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Ship and Boat Building › Ship Building and Repairing
Product/Service Code: SHIPS, SMALL CRAFT, PONTOON, DOCKS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: N0002412R4307
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp
Address: 75 EASTERN POINT RD, GROTON, CT, 06340
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $217,065,897
Exercised Options: $217,065,897
Current Obligation: $214,835,473
Actual Outlays: $-80,270
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2012-12-16
Current End Date: 2017-12-06
Potential End Date: 2017-12-06 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2022-08-25
More Contracts from Electric Boat Corporation
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Department of Defense)
- Columbia Class Design Completion — $24.5B (Department of Defense)
- SSN 792 Long Lead Time Material — $19.9B (Department of Defense)
- Construction of Virginia Class Block III Submarines — $16.2B (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $9.4B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)