DoD awards $10.1M for JCREW EW Systems to Sierra Nevada Company, LLC under full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,111,530 ($10.1M)

Contractor: Sierra Nevada Company, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-12-07

End Date: 2014-07-09

Contract Duration: 2,406 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 30

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: ALL MATERIAL AND SERVICES REQUIRED TO MANUFACTURE, ENGINEER, BUILD, AND DEVELOP JOINT COUNTER RADIO-CONTROLLED IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE ELECTRONIC WARFARE (JCREW) SYSTEMS.

Place of Performance

Location: SPARKS, WASHOE County, NEVADA, 89434

State: Nevada Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.1 million to SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC for work described as: ALL MATERIAL AND SERVICES REQUIRED TO MANUFACTURE, ENGINEER, BUILD, AND DEVELOP JOINT COUNTER RADIO-CONTROLLED IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE ELECTRONIC WARFARE (JCREW) SYSTEMS. Key points: 1. The contract focuses on manufacturing, engineering, building, and developing JCREW systems, a critical electronic warfare capability. 2. Sierra Nevada Company, LLC, a significant defense contractor, secured this award. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The award type is a Cost Plus Award Fee, which incentivizes performance but can lead to higher costs if not managed carefully.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The Cost Plus Award Fee structure allows for flexibility but requires close monitoring to ensure cost-effectiveness. The award fee mechanism aims to incentivize performance, but the ultimate cost is tied to actual expenses plus an award.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating multiple bidders likely participated. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows the government to select the best value offer.

Taxpayer Impact: While competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers, the Cost Plus Award Fee structure necessitates robust oversight to prevent cost overruns and ensure value for money.

Public Impact

Enhances electronic warfare capabilities for the Department of Defense. Supports the development and manufacturing of advanced counter-IED technology. Contributes to soldier safety by mitigating radio-controlled IED threats. Represents investment in specialized defense manufacturing and engineering.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 100 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Award Fee contract type can lead to cost uncertainty.
Long contract duration (2406 days) requires sustained oversight.
No explicit mention of small business participation.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Focus on critical electronic warfare systems.
Potential for performance incentives through award fee.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense Industrial Base sector, specifically focusing on electronic warfare systems. Spending in this area is critical for maintaining technological superiority and national security, with benchmarks often driven by technological advancement and threat evolution.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any specific set-aside for small businesses, nor does it mention their participation in this contract. Further investigation would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement.

Oversight & Accountability

The Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) is responsible for oversight. The Cost Plus Award Fee structure requires diligent monitoring of costs and performance to ensure accountability and prevent potential overruns.

Related Government Programs

Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing
Department of Defense Contracting
Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Cost Plus Award Fee structure
Long contract duration
Lack of small business participation data
Potential for cost overruns without strict oversight

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.1 million to SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC. ALL MATERIAL AND SERVICES REQUIRED TO MANUFACTURE, ENGINEER, BUILD, AND DEVELOP JOINT COUNTER RADIO-CONTROLLED IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE ELECTRONIC WARFARE (JCREW) SYSTEMS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-12-07. End: 2014-07-09.

What is the typical cost range for similar JCREW system development contracts?

Determining a precise cost range for similar JCREW system development contracts is challenging without access to proprietary data and specific system capabilities. However, contracts for advanced electronic warfare systems can range from millions to hundreds of millions of dollars, depending on complexity, technology maturity, and production volume. Factors like R&D investment, specialized components, and integration requirements significantly influence pricing.

What are the key performance metrics tied to the award fee for this contract?

The specific key performance metrics tied to the award fee are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, for Cost Plus Award Fee contracts in defense manufacturing, these metrics would relate to meeting technical specifications, adhering to delivery schedules, achieving quality standards, and potentially demonstrating innovation or cost savings. The contracting officer would define and evaluate performance against these criteria.

How effectively has Sierra Nevada Company, LLC performed on previous electronic warfare contracts?

Assessing Sierra Nevada Company, LLC's performance on previous electronic warfare contracts requires reviewing past performance evaluations and contract histories. While this specific data point is not provided, the company is a known entity in the defense sector. A comprehensive review would involve examining on-time delivery, adherence to budget, technical success rates, and any documented issues or commendations on prior EW-related awards.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Navigational, Measuring, Electromedical, and Control Instruments Manufacturing › Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: COMM/DETECT/COHERENT RADIATION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N0002407R6304

Offers Received: 30

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 444 SALOMON CIR, SPARKS, NV, 89434

Business Categories: Category Business, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Subchapter S Corporation, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,210,165

Exercised Options: $10,111,530

Current Obligation: $10,111,530

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline