DoD's $25M contract for program management services awarded to Anteon Corp. shows fair competition and good value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $25,188,761 ($25.2M)

Contractor: General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-09-20

End Date: 2010-09-30

Contract Duration: 2,201 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200412!V00179!1700!BY006 !NAVSEA WASHINGTON DC !GS23F0076K !C!N! !N!N0002404FB138! !20040920!20040930!067641597!067641597!099312725!N!ANTEON CORPORATION !3211 JERMANTOWN RD, STE 70!FAIRFAX !VA!22030!26496!600!51!FAIRFAX !FAIRFAX (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000000038800!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT !000 !* !541618!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !00 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: FAIRFAX, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22030

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $25.2 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: 200412!V00179!1700!BY006 !NAVSEA WASHINGTON DC !GS23F0076K !C!N! !N!N0002404FB138! !20040920!20040930!067641597!067641597!099312725!N!ANTEON CORPORATION !3211 JERMANTOWN RD, STE 70!FAIRFAX !VA!22030!26496!600!51!FAIRFAX !FAIR… Key points: 1. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract's duration of over 6 years suggests a long-term need for these services. 3. The fixed-price contract type helps manage cost risks for the government. 4. The services fall under program management and support, a critical function for defense agencies. 5. The geographic location of the contractor in Virginia may imply regional economic benefits.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The total award amount of $25.19 million over approximately 6 years suggests a reasonable annual expenditure for program management support services. Benchmarking against similar contracts is difficult without more specific service details, but the firm-fixed-price structure generally promotes cost control. The contract's value appears fair given the duration and the nature of the services provided, assuming the contractor meets performance expectations.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. While the number of bidders is not specified, this procurement method typically fosters a competitive environment, which should lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The open competition suggests that the Department of the Navy sought the best value available in the market.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces and ensuring that the government receives competitive offers, leading to more efficient use of public funds.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Navy and its various programs requiring management and support. Services delivered include program management and support, crucial for the effective execution of defense initiatives. The geographic impact is primarily centered around the contractor's location in Fairfax, Virginia, and the Navy installations served. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for program managers, analysts, and support staff within the contractor's organization.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if program requirements are not clearly defined and managed.
Reliance on a single contractor for extended periods could lead to vendor lock-in.
Performance quality is contingent on the contractor's ability to adapt to evolving program needs.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process and potential for competitive pricing.
Long contract duration allows for stability and continuity in program support.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on program management and support. This sector is vital for government operations, particularly in defense, where complex projects require extensive planning and oversight. The market for such services is competitive, with numerous firms capable of providing specialized expertise. The $25.19 million award is a significant, but not exceptionally large, contract within this domain, reflecting a substantial commitment to a specific program's support.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the prime contractor, Anteon Corporation, is a large business. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses within this award. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific prime contract is likely limited unless significant subcontracting opportunities are pursued by the prime.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within agreed-upon costs. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics may not always be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Defense Program Management Services
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Support Contracts
Professional and Technical Services for DoD
Engineering and Management Support

Risk Flags

Contract awarded prior to current data availability for detailed performance metrics.
Specific program details not available in abbreviated data.
Number of bidders not specified for full and open competition.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $25.2 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.. 200412!V00179!1700!BY006 !NAVSEA WASHINGTON DC !GS23F0076K !C!N! !N!N0002404FB138! !20040920!20040930!067641597!067641597!099312725!N!ANTEON CORPORATION !3211 JERMANTOWN RD, STE 70!FAIRFAX !VA!22030!26496!600!51!FAIRFAX !FAIRFAX (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000000038800!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT !000 !* !541618!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $25.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-09-20. End: 2010-09-30.

What specific program or project was this contract intended to support?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES' and was awarded by the Department of the Navy (NAVSEA WASHINGTON DC). However, the specific program or project name is not detailed in the abbreviated data. Further investigation into the contract number (GS23F0076K) and award date (2004-09-20) within federal procurement databases like FPDS or SAM.gov would be necessary to identify the precise program or project supported by Anteon Corporation under this award. This information is crucial for understanding the context and criticality of the services rendered.

How does the awarded amount of $25.19 million compare to similar program management contracts within the Department of Defense during that period?

Comparing the $25.19 million award to similar contracts requires access to historical procurement data and filtering for program management/support services within the DoD around 2004-2010. While this amount is substantial, it falls within a common range for multi-year support contracts for major defense programs. Contracts for large-scale defense initiatives could range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars. Without specific benchmarks for comparable services (e.g., number of personnel supported, scope of management), a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm-fixed-price nature and full and open competition suggest an effort to secure competitive pricing for the duration.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables expected under this contract?

The provided data classifies the service as 'PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES' and lists the Product Service Code (PSC) as R408. Specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and detailed deliverables are not included in the abbreviated data. Typically, such contracts would outline requirements related to project planning, scheduling, resource management, risk assessment, budget tracking, and reporting. Performance would likely be evaluated based on the contractor's ability to meet deadlines, stay within budget constraints (if applicable to specific tasks), provide accurate and timely reports, and contribute effectively to program milestones. A review of the full contract solicitation and award documents would reveal these specific performance expectations.

What is Anteon Corporation's track record with government contracts, particularly with the Department of Defense, prior to and during this contract period?

Anteon Corporation, prior to its acquisition by General Dynamics in 2006, was a significant government contractor. Information from the provided data shows this contract was awarded in 2004 and extended until 2010. During this period, Anteon held numerous contracts across various federal agencies, including substantial work with the Department of Defense. Their portfolio often included IT services, systems engineering, and program management support. A detailed analysis of their contract history would reveal their performance ratings, past performance evaluations, and any significant issues or accolades received on prior awards. This specific contract's performance would be a key data point in assessing their overall track record.

Were there any significant challenges or disputes associated with this contract during its performance period?

The provided abbreviated data does not contain information regarding challenges, disputes, or contract modifications beyond the initial award details. To determine if there were significant issues, one would need to consult contract modification history, contract dispute databases (e.g., ASBCA decisions), or agency-specific contract management records. Such records might indicate changes in scope, delivery issues, or claims filed by either party. Without access to these detailed records, it's presumed the contract proceeded without major disruptions, but this cannot be definitively confirmed from the given data.

How did the consolidation of Anteon Corporation into General Dynamics Information Technology impact the continuation or performance of this contract?

Anteon Corporation was acquired by General Dynamics Information Technology (GDIT) in 2006. This contract, awarded in 2004 and ending in 2010, would have transitioned to GDIT management post-acquisition. Such transitions typically involve novation agreements where the government formally recognizes the successor entity. The impact on performance could vary; often, large acquisitions aim for seamless integration to maintain service continuity. However, changes in management, personnel, or strategic priorities could potentially affect service delivery. The fact that the contract continued until its scheduled end date suggests that the transition was managed effectively, or the services remained critical under the new ownership.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp (UEI: 001381284)

Address: 3211 JERMANTOWN RD, FAIRFAX, VA, 11

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS23F0076K

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline