DoD's $96M contract for IT services to DRS Technical Services Inc. awarded via full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,071,094 ($23.1M)

Contractor: DRS Technical Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-08-20

End Date: 2008-10-10

Contract Duration: 1,512 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: 200412!V00082!1700!BY006 !NAVSEA WASHINGTON DC !GS35F0056J !C!N! !N!N0002404FB131! !20040820!20041031!962955068!023185734!061345351!N!DRS TECHNICAL SERVICES INC !2535 CAMINO DEL RIO SOUTH !SAN DIEGO !CA!92108!21082!073!06!EAST SAN DIEGO !SAN DIEGO !CALIFORNIA!+000000010000!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541330!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !00 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92108

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $23.1 million to DRS TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: 200412!V00082!1700!BY006 !NAVSEA WASHINGTON DC !GS35F0056J !C!N! !N!N0002404FB131! !20040820!20041031!962955068!023185734!061345351!N!DRS TECHNICAL SERVICES INC !2535 CAMINO DEL RIO SOUTH !SAN DIEGO !CA!92108!21082!073!06!EAST SAN DIEGO !SAN … Key points: 1. The contract value is substantial at $96.3 million, indicating significant IT service needs. 2. Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The primary contractor, DRS Technical Services Inc., is a large business. 4. The sector is IT, specifically Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, and Related Services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $96.3 million over approximately 4 years (2004-2008) suggests a significant investment. Without specific unit costs or detailed service breakdowns, a precise pricing assessment is difficult, but the duration and scope imply a substantial commitment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION', indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is intended to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that drives down costs.

Public Impact

This contract supports critical IT infrastructure and data processing for the Department of Defense. The duration of the contract (over 4 years) suggests a long-term need for these services. The award to a single large business may have implications for small business participation in subcontracting.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of specific performance metrics or service level agreements makes it hard to assess value for money.
  • Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurs without adequate oversight.
  • Reliance on a single large contractor could limit flexibility and innovation over time.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition, which typically leads to better pricing.
  • The contract is for essential IT services supporting national defense.
  • The contractor has a history of performing government contracts.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT sector, specifically 'Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services'. Spending in this area is crucial for modern government operations, with benchmarks varying widely based on the specific services and scale.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to a large business (DRS Technical Services, Inc.) and does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. While large prime contracts can sometimes offer subcontracting opportunities for small businesses, this data does not provide details on such arrangements.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. The effectiveness of oversight depends on established procedures for monitoring performance, managing changes, and ensuring compliance with contract terms.

Related Government Programs

  • Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns if scope is not tightly managed.
  • Risk of vendor lock-in due to the long-term nature of the contract.
  • Dependence on a single contractor for critical IT functions.
  • Lack of detailed performance metrics in the provided data makes value assessment difficult.

Tags

computing-infrastructure-providers-data-, department-of-defense, ca, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $23.1 million to DRS TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.. 200412!V00082!1700!BY006 !NAVSEA WASHINGTON DC !GS35F0056J !C!N! !N!N0002404FB131! !20040820!20041031!962955068!023185734!061345351!N!DRS TECHNICAL SERVICES INC !2535 CAMINO DEL RIO SOUTH !SAN DIEGO !CA!92108!21082!073!06!EAST SAN DIEGO !SAN DIEGO !CALIFORNIA!+000000010000!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541330!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DRS TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-08-20. End: 2008-10-10.

What specific IT services are included in this $96.3 million contract, and how do their costs compare to industry benchmarks for similar services during the 2004-2008 period?

The data indicates 'PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES' and falls under NAICS code 518210 (Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, etc.). Without a detailed breakdown of services and specific deliverables, a precise cost comparison is challenging. However, given the era and the nature of IT support for defense, costs would be influenced by factors like security requirements, uptime guarantees, and the complexity of the systems managed.

What were the key evaluation criteria used in the full and open competition, and how did they balance technical merit against price to mitigate potential risks?

While the award was 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION', the specific evaluation criteria are not detailed in this record. Typically, such procurements balance technical approach, past performance, and price. The contracting agency would have established a methodology to weigh these factors, aiming to select the offer that represented the best value while mitigating risks associated with technical feasibility and cost.

How effectively did the Department of the Navy ensure that the services provided under this contract met evolving technological needs and security requirements throughout its four-year duration?

The effectiveness of service delivery and adaptation to evolving needs relies heavily on the contract's structure for change management, performance monitoring, and the contractor's responsiveness. Regular reviews, clear communication channels, and potentially contract modifications would be essential to ensure the services remained relevant and secure in the rapidly changing IT landscape of the mid-2000s.

Industry Classification

NAICS: InformationComputing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related ServicesComputing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Leonardo SPA (UEI: 428869465)

Address: 2535 CAMINO DEL RIO S STE 300, SAN DIEGO, CA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F0056J

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2004-08-20

Current End Date: 2008-10-10

Potential End Date: 2008-10-10 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2010-06-09

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending