Boeing Awarded $110.7M for E-6A Aircraft Components by Naval Air Systems Command

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $110,754,861 ($110.8M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 1999-10-01

End Date: 2011-12-01

Contract Duration: 4,444 days

Daily Burn Rate: $24.9K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200001!1700!000113!AC514 !NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0001999C1228 !A!*!* !19990909!20040430!039267141!009256819!009256819!N!81205!THE BOEING COMPANY !7755 E MARGINAL WAY !SEATTLE !WA!98124!73800!017!40!TINKER AFB !CANADIAN !OKLAHOMA !0001!+000011480000!N!N!000000000000!1680!MSL AIRCRAFT ACCESSORIES AND COMPONENTS !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION !2GHY!E-6A (TACAMO) !3812!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!D !N!J!1!001!N!1A!A!Y!A!* !* !N!C!*!A!A!A!A!A!A!* !*!N!A!C!N!*!*!*!Y!*!

Place of Performance

Location: WICHITA, SEDGWICK County, KANSAS, 67210

State: Kansas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $110.8 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: 200001!1700!000113!AC514 !NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0001999C1228 !A!*!* !19990909!20040430!039267141!009256819!009256819!N!81205!THE BOEING COMPANY !7755 E MARGINAL WAY !SEATTLE !WA!98124!73800!017!40!TINKER AFB !CAN… Key points: 1. Significant contract value for aircraft components. 2. Sole-source award to The Boeing Company raises competition concerns. 3. Long contract duration of over 12 years. 4. Focus on critical E-6A (TACAMO) aircraft systems.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $110.7M for aircraft accessories and components appears high given the 'NOT COMPETED' status. Benchmarking against similar sole-source contracts for specialized aerospace components would be necessary for a definitive assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, indicating a lack of competitive bidding. This method limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source nature of this award may result in taxpayers paying a premium due to the absence of competition.

Public Impact

Ensures continued operation and maintenance of the E-6A (TACAMO) aircraft, vital for strategic communications. Supports a major defense contractor, The Boeing Company, and its supply chain. Potential for increased costs to taxpayers due to lack of competition.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Long contract duration
  • Lack of transparency in pricing

Positive Signals

  • Ensures critical aircraft component availability
  • Supports established defense contractor

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the aerospace and defense sector, specifically for aircraft components. Spending in this area is often characterized by high R&D costs, specialized manufacturing, and long procurement cycles, frequently involving sole-source awards for unique systems.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific provisions or set-asides for small businesses in this sole-source contract awarded to The Boeing Company.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants scrutiny to ensure fair pricing and justification for not pursuing competitive options. Oversight should focus on the necessity of the sole-source justification and the reasonableness of the final price.

Related Government Programs

  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award lacks competition
  • Potential for inflated pricing
  • Long contract duration may increase obsolescence risk
  • Limited transparency on cost justification

Tags

department-of-defense, ks, definitive-contract, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $110.8 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. 200001!1700!000113!AC514 !NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0001999C1228 !A!*!* !19990909!20040430!039267141!009256819!009256819!N!81205!THE BOEING COMPANY !7755 E MARGINAL WAY !SEATTLE !WA!98124!73800!017!40!TINKER AFB !CANADIAN !OKLAHOMA !0001!+000011480000!N!N!000000000000!1680!MSL AIRCRAFT ACCESSORIES AND COMPONENTS !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION !2GHY!E-6A (TACAMO) !3812!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!D !N!J!

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $110.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 1999-10-01. End: 2011-12-01.

What is the justification for the sole-source award to The Boeing Company for these specific aircraft components?

The justification for a sole-source award typically stems from unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or the need for compatibility with existing systems that only one contractor can provide. For the E-6A (TACAMO) program, this could relate to highly specialized components or integration requirements that Boeing uniquely possesses or developed.

How does the $110.7M contract value compare to similar sole-source procurements for specialized aircraft components?

Without specific benchmarks for comparable sole-source procurements of specialized E-6A components, it's difficult to definitively assess value. However, the 'NOT COMPETED' status inherently raises concerns about potential overpricing compared to what might be achieved through a competitive process. Further analysis of the contract's line items and historical pricing is needed.

What is the long-term effectiveness and potential obsolescence risk associated with these E-6A components?

The effectiveness of these components is critical for the E-6A's strategic communication role. The long contract duration (over 12 years) suggests a need for sustained support. However, it also introduces obsolescence risk if technology advances rapidly. The government should have plans for managing component lifecycle and potential upgrades or replacements.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 7755 E MARGINAL WAY S, SEATTLE, WA, 98108

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 1999-10-01

Current End Date: 2011-12-01

Potential End Date: 2011-12-01 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2020-10-05

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending