DoD's $56.5M contract for aircraft engine parts awarded to RTX Corporation, raising questions about competition and value
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $56,467,472 ($56.5M)
Contractor: RTX Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-12-29
End Date: 2028-12-31
Contract Duration: 1,098 days
Daily Burn Rate: $51.4K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: DEPOT COMMON SHARE
Place of Performance
Location: EAST HARTFORD, HARTFORD County, CONNECTICUT, 06118
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $56.5 million to RTX CORPORATION for work described as: DEPOT COMMON SHARE Key points: 1. The contract's value of $56.5 million warrants scrutiny for cost-effectiveness. 2. Awarded to a single vendor, RTX Corporation, suggests limited competition, potentially impacting pricing. 3. The firm fixed-price contract type aims to control costs but requires careful monitoring of performance. 4. The duration of 1098 days indicates a long-term commitment, necessitating sustained value assessment. 5. The absence of small business involvement raises concerns about broader economic impact. 6. The contract falls under the 'Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing' sector, a critical area for defense readiness.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
Benchmarking the value of this $56.5 million contract is challenging without specific details on the engine parts and their quantities. However, given the sole-source nature of the award, there's a risk that the pricing may not reflect competitive market rates. Comparing this to similar sole-source awards for specialized aircraft components would be necessary to determine if the price is fair and reasonable. The firm fixed-price structure provides some cost certainty, but the overall value proposition depends heavily on the necessity of this specific vendor and the negotiated price.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only one vendor, RTX Corporation, was solicited. This approach is typically used when a specific capability or part is only available from a single source, or in cases of urgent need. The lack of competition means that price discovery through market forces was bypassed, potentially leading to higher costs for the government. The justification for a sole-source award needs to be robust to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently.
Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards limit the government's ability to leverage competition to secure the best possible prices, potentially resulting in higher expenditures for taxpayers. This approach bypasses the natural cost-saving mechanisms that arise from multiple vendors bidding for a contract.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense, ensuring the continued operation and maintenance of its aircraft fleet. The contract delivers essential aircraft engine and engine parts, crucial for maintaining military readiness. The geographic impact is primarily within Connecticut, where RTX Corporation has significant operations. Workforce implications include the potential for sustained employment at RTX Corporation and its supply chain partners.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competitive bidding may lead to inflated prices.
- Sole-source awards can stifle innovation by limiting market access for other potential suppliers.
- Dependence on a single supplier creates a potential supply chain risk.
- The contract does not appear to include provisions for small business subcontracting, limiting economic opportunities.
Positive Signals
- Award to a known entity, RTX Corporation, suggests a level of established capability and reliability.
- Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- The contract duration indicates a long-term need, suggesting strategic importance for defense operations.
Sector Analysis
The 'Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing' sector is a critical component of the aerospace and defense industry. This market is characterized by high barriers to entry due to complex technology, stringent quality requirements, and significant R&D investment. Major players like RTX Corporation dominate this space. Government spending in this area is substantial, driven by the need to maintain aging fleets and develop next-generation aircraft. Benchmarking would involve comparing pricing for similar engine components across different defense contracts and commercial aviation.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, nor is there explicit information regarding subcontracting goals for small businesses. This means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this significant defense spending are likely limited. The absence of such provisions could impact the broader small business ecosystem within the aerospace and defense supply chain, potentially concentrating benefits among larger corporations.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Defense's contracting and financial management offices, with potential involvement from the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). Inspector General (IG) investigations could be initiated if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, but detailed justifications for sole-source awards and performance metrics may not always be publicly accessible.
Related Government Programs
- Aircraft Maintenance and Repair
- Defense Procurement
- Aerospace Manufacturing
- Engine Component Supply
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Potential for price inflation
- Lack of small business participation
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, rtx-corporation, aircraft-engine-parts, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, department-of-the-navy, connecticut, large-contract, manufacturing
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $56.5 million to RTX CORPORATION. DEPOT COMMON SHARE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is RTX CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $56.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-12-29. End: 2028-12-31.
What is RTX Corporation's track record with the Department of Defense for similar aircraft engine parts contracts?
RTX Corporation, through its various subsidiaries like Pratt & Whitney, is a major defense contractor with a long history of supplying aircraft engines and components to the Department of Defense. They have a significant portfolio of contracts for various military aircraft platforms. Analyzing their past performance on similar firm fixed-price, sole-source awards for engine parts would provide insight into their reliability, delivery timeliness, and adherence to quality standards. Historical data from FPDS and agency performance reports would be crucial to assess their track record, looking for any patterns of cost overruns, delivery delays, or quality issues on comparable contracts. This context is vital for understanding the risk associated with this specific award.
How does the pricing of this contract compare to market rates for similar aircraft engine parts?
Directly comparing the pricing of this $56.5 million contract to market rates is difficult without knowing the specific engine parts, quantities, and technical specifications involved. However, as a sole-source award, there is an inherent risk that the price may be higher than if it were competitively bid. To assess value, one would need to benchmark against prices paid by other government agencies or commercial entities for comparable components, if available. Analyzing historical pricing trends for similar parts supplied by RTX or its competitors, and examining any cost breakdowns provided in the contract documentation, would be essential. The firm fixed-price nature suggests a negotiated price, but the absence of competition limits the ability to definitively state if it represents optimal value for taxpayers.
What are the primary risks associated with awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?
The primary risks associated with awarding this contract on a sole-source basis to RTX Corporation include potential price inflation due to the lack of competition, reduced incentive for the contractor to innovate or offer cost efficiencies, and increased supply chain vulnerability if RTX faces production issues. There's also a risk that the government may not be receiving the best possible value for its investment. Furthermore, sole-source awards can create a perception of favoritism and may limit opportunities for other capable small and large businesses to enter the market or expand their capabilities. Robust justification and oversight are critical to mitigate these risks.
What is the expected effectiveness of this contract in ensuring the operational readiness of DoD aircraft?
The effectiveness of this contract in ensuring the operational readiness of DoD aircraft hinges on the timely delivery of high-quality engine parts as specified. Given that RTX Corporation is a major manufacturer of aircraft engines and parts, there is a reasonable expectation of capability. The firm fixed-price contract type aims to ensure cost predictability. However, the sole-source nature introduces a risk factor; any delays or quality issues from RTX could directly impact aircraft availability and mission readiness. Continuous monitoring of performance metrics, delivery schedules, and quality control by the Department of the Navy will be crucial to gauge and ensure the contract's effectiveness.
What are the historical spending patterns for aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing by the Department of Defense?
The Department of Defense historically spends billions of dollars annually on aircraft engines and engine parts manufacturing, reflecting the critical role of aviation in national security. Spending in this category is driven by the maintenance of existing fleets, upgrades to current platforms, and the development of new aircraft. RTX Corporation, along with other major aerospace and defense companies, consistently receives substantial portions of this spending. Analyzing historical spending data from sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) would reveal trends in contract values, types of awards (competitive vs. sole-source), and the distribution of funds among key contractors within this sector over time.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: ENGINES AND TURBINES AND COMPONENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: RTX Corp
Address: 400 MAIN ST, EAST HARTFORD, CT, 06118
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $56,467,472
Exercised Options: $56,467,472
Current Obligation: $56,467,472
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N0001920D0013
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-12-29
Current End Date: 2028-12-31
Potential End Date: 2028-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-30
More Contracts from RTX Corporation
- LOT 12 AAC Long Lead for Propulsion Systems — $8.7B (Department of Defense)
- 200204!008533!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3003 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!001447952!001447952!001344142!n!united Technologies Corp !400 Main Street !east Hartford !ct!06108!22700!003!09!east Hartford !hartford !conn !+000014000000!n!n!004803460088!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1b!aircraft Engines and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !541710!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !d!n!r!1!001!n!1a!a!y!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $7.9B (Department of Defense)
- LOT 15 FMS-1 F135 Ctol Prop System — $7.5B (Department of Defense)
- FY21 PBL2 — $4.9B (Department of Defense)
- F119 Engine Long Term Sustainment Program for the Raptor Engine (spare) — $3.6B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)