DoD awards Northrop Grumman $116M for FMU-139D/B Bomb Fuzes, with no competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $116,387,796 ($116.4M)

Contractor: Northrop Grumman Systems Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2024-09-09

End Date: 2027-03-31

Contract Duration: 933 days

Daily Burn Rate: $124.7K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: FMU-139D/B BOMB, ELECTRONIC FUZE SYSTEMS, TRAINER AND INERT FUZE SYSTEMS

Place of Performance

Location: KEYSER, MINERAL County, WEST VIRGINIA, 26726

State: West Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $116.4 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP for work described as: FMU-139D/B BOMB, ELECTRONIC FUZE SYSTEMS, TRAINER AND INERT FUZE SYSTEMS Key points: 1. Significant contract value for specialized ordnance components. 2. Sole-source award raises concerns about price discovery and competition. 3. Long contract duration (over 3 years) impacts long-term value assessment. 4. The sector is defense manufacturing, a critical but often high-cost area.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's value of $116M over 933 days for electronic fuze systems is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to benchmark pricing against similar contracts or market rates, raising questions about cost-effectiveness.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers as there is no market pressure to offer the best price.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition on this $116M contract means taxpayers may be paying a premium for these electronic fuze systems.

Public Impact

Ensures supply of critical bomb fuzes for naval operations. Potential for cost overruns due to lack of competitive pressure. Long-term contract may lock in pricing, impacting future savings. Supports a major defense contractor's operations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of competition
  • Long contract duration

Positive Signals

  • Critical defense component
  • Established contractor

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the defense manufacturing sector, specifically ordnance. Spending in this area is often characterized by high R&D costs, specialized manufacturing, and a limited number of qualified suppliers, which can drive up prices.

Small Business Impact

The awardee, Northrop Grumman Systems Corp, is a large defense contractor. There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this specific contract, either as prime or subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of the Navy awarded this contract. Oversight would focus on ensuring performance and adherence to the firm fixed price, especially given the sole-source nature which reduces inherent price oversight.

Related Government Programs

  • Small Arms, Ordnance, and Ordnance Accessories Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for inflated pricing
  • Limited technological adaptability
  • Long-term commitment without market validation

Tags

small-arms-ordnance-and-ordnance-accesso, department-of-defense, wv, delivery-order, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $116.4 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP. FMU-139D/B BOMB, ELECTRONIC FUZE SYSTEMS, TRAINER AND INERT FUZE SYSTEMS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $116.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-09-09. End: 2027-03-31.

What is the justification for the sole-source award, and what steps were taken to ensure fair and reasonable pricing?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves factors like unique capabilities, urgent need, or lack of viable alternatives. The Department of Defense should have conducted a price analysis, comparing proposed costs to historical data, commercial price lists, or other available benchmarks to ensure the price was fair and reasonable, despite the absence of competition.

What is the projected cost per unit for the FMU-139D/B fuze systems under this contract?

Without a breakdown of the total contract value by the number of units procured, the per-unit cost cannot be definitively calculated. However, given the $116M contract value and the nature of electronic fuze systems, the per-unit cost is likely to be significant, potentially in the thousands of dollars, especially considering R&D and specialized manufacturing.

How does the long contract duration (over 3 years) impact the government's ability to adapt to technological advancements in fuze systems?

A long contract duration can limit the government's flexibility to adopt newer, potentially more advanced or cost-effective technologies that may emerge during the contract period. While modifications are possible, they can be complex and costly. This duration suggests a need for a stable supply of the current system, but it carries the risk of obsolescence or missed opportunities for innovation.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingOther Fabricated Metal Product ManufacturingSmall Arms, Ordnance, and Ordnance Accessories Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AMMUNITION AND EXPLOSIVES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: N0001923R0104

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 210 STATE ROUTE 956, KEYSER, WV, 26726

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $116,387,796

Exercised Options: $116,387,796

Current Obligation: $116,387,796

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 63

Total Subaward Amount: $35,567,489

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0001924D0104

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2024-09-09

Current End Date: 2027-03-31

Potential End Date: 2027-03-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-05-21

More Contracts from Northrop Grumman Systems Corp

View all Northrop Grumman Systems Corp federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending