DoD Awards $6.26M for ISR Services and Training to Insitu, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,263,525 ($6.3M)

Contractor: Insitu, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2024-09-01

End Date: 2025-12-31

Contract Duration: 486 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: ISR SERVICES AT OIR LOT 3 TO INCLUDE ISR LAND-BASED FAMILIARIZATION TRAINING, ISR LAND-BASED MISSION COORDINATOR, SITE SURVEY, PRE-DEPLOYMENT, DEPLOYMENT, AND POST-DEPLOYMENT SUPPORT FOR UP TO 36 MONTHS INCLUSIVE OF TWO OPTION PERIODS.

Place of Performance

Location: BINGEN, KLICKITAT County, WASHINGTON, 98605

State: Washington Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $6.3 million to INSITU, INC. for work described as: ISR SERVICES AT OIR LOT 3 TO INCLUDE ISR LAND-BASED FAMILIARIZATION TRAINING, ISR LAND-BASED MISSION COORDINATOR, SITE SURVEY, PRE-DEPLOYMENT, DEPLOYMENT, AND POST-DEPLOYMENT SUPPORT FOR UP TO 36 MONTHS INCLUSIVE OF TWO OPTION PERIODS. Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Insitu, Inc. for Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) services and training. 2. The contract includes land-based familiarization training, mission coordination, site surveys, and deployment support. 3. Duration of the contract is up to 36 months, including two option periods. 4. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, indicating a set cost for the services. 5. This award falls under the Surveying and Mapping services sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $6.26 million for up to 36 months of ISR services appears reasonable given the scope of work. Benchmarking against similar ISR support contracts is difficult without more specific details on the services provided and the level of support required.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' suggesting a limited competition where specific sources were identified and competed. This method can sometimes lead to less aggressive pricing compared to full and open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The total value of $6.26 million represents taxpayer funds allocated for critical ISR capabilities and training, essential for national security operations.

Public Impact

Enhances national security capabilities through advanced ISR services and training. Supports military readiness and operational effectiveness by providing essential intelligence gathering and analysis. Potential for technology transfer and skill development within the defense sector. Ensures personnel are adequately trained for complex ISR missions.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition may not yield the best possible price.
Contract duration and potential for extensions require careful monitoring.

Positive Signals

Provides critical ISR capabilities for national security.
Includes comprehensive training to ensure effective mission execution.
Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Surveying and Mapping (except Geophysical) Services sector (NAICS 541370). Spending in this sector is often driven by defense, infrastructure, and environmental monitoring needs. Benchmarks for ISR-specific services can vary widely based on technology and operational tempo.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small businesses were not directly awarded this contract, as it was awarded to Insitu, Inc. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses are involved as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of the Navy, under the Department of Defense, is responsible for overseeing this contract. The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' suggests a structured procurement process, but ongoing oversight is crucial to ensure performance and cost control.

Related Government Programs

Surveying and Mapping (except Geophysical) Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurs.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical ISR capabilities.
Risk of technological obsolescence if services are not updated.
Effectiveness of limited competition in achieving best value.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $6.3 million to INSITU, INC.. ISR SERVICES AT OIR LOT 3 TO INCLUDE ISR LAND-BASED FAMILIARIZATION TRAINING, ISR LAND-BASED MISSION COORDINATOR, SITE SURVEY, PRE-DEPLOYMENT, DEPLOYMENT, AND POST-DEPLOYMENT SUPPORT FOR UP TO 36 MONTHS INCLUSIVE OF TWO OPTION PERIODS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INSITU, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-09-01. End: 2025-12-31.

What specific technologies and platforms are included in the ISR services, and how do they compare to industry standards?

The provided data does not specify the exact ISR technologies or platforms. Understanding the specifics is crucial for assessing value and ensuring the services align with current industry standards and operational requirements. Without this detail, it's difficult to benchmark the effectiveness or technological relevance of the awarded services.

What was the rationale for excluding other potential sources in the competition, and were there any protests or challenges to this decision?

The rationale for excluding other sources is not detailed in the provided data. Typically, such exclusions are based on specific technical capabilities, past performance, or unique requirements. Investigating the justification for source exclusion and any associated challenges is important for understanding the fairness of the procurement process and potential risks to competition.

How will the effectiveness of the ISR training and mission support be measured and evaluated throughout the contract period?

The provided data does not outline the specific metrics or evaluation methods for the ISR training and mission support. Establishing clear performance standards and evaluation criteria is essential for ensuring the effectiveness of the services and the successful achievement of mission objectives. Without defined measures, assessing the true value and impact of the contract is challenging.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Surveying and Mapping (except Geophysical) Services

Product/Service Code: TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE SVCS. › TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: ALTERNATIVE SOURCES

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: THE Boeing Company

Address: 118 E COLUMBIA RIVER WAY, BINGEN, WA, 98605

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,034,669

Exercised Options: $6,263,525

Current Obligation: $6,263,525

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 3

Total Subaward Amount: $365,705

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0001921G0007

IDV Type: BOA

Timeline