DoD's $14.2M contract for LAF fleet digital conversion awarded to Insitu, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,195,215 ($14.2M)

Contractor: Insitu, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2024-03-08

End Date: 2027-01-26

Contract Duration: 1,054 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.5K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: THE PURPOSE OF THIS DELIVERY ORDER IS TO PROCURE HARDWARE AND SERVICES TO CONVERT THE LEBANON AIR FORCE (LAF) FLEET FROM ANALOG TO DIGITAL AND THE ABILITY TO OPERATE THE NEW DIGITAL AND VIDAR TECHNOLOGY.

Place of Performance

Location: BINGEN, KLICKITAT County, WASHINGTON, 98605

State: Washington Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.2 million to INSITU, INC. for work described as: THE PURPOSE OF THIS DELIVERY ORDER IS TO PROCURE HARDWARE AND SERVICES TO CONVERT THE LEBANON AIR FORCE (LAF) FLEET FROM ANALOG TO DIGITAL AND THE ABILITY TO OPERATE THE NEW DIGITAL AND VIDAR TECHNOLOGY. Key points: 1. Contract aims to modernize Lebanon Air Force fleet with digital and VIDAR technology. 2. Sole-source award raises questions about competition and potential cost efficiencies. 3. Long performance period (over 3 years) requires careful monitoring of progress. 4. Firm-fixed-price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor. 5. Engineering services sector sees significant investment in technological upgrades. 6. Focus on hardware and services indicates a comprehensive modernization approach.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's value of $14.2 million for hardware and services to convert a fleet from analog to digital is substantial. Without comparable contracts for similar fleet conversions or specific details on the scope of services and hardware, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator if the price is competitive. However, the lack of competition means there's no benchmark to assess if this price is optimal.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning there was no open competition. The data indicates it was 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION'. This approach is typically used when only one source is capable of meeting the requirement, often due to unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or urgent needs. The absence of multiple bidders means that price discovery through competitive bidding was not utilized, potentially leading to higher costs than if multiple firms had competed.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition means taxpayers may not have received the benefit of a lower price that could have resulted from a competitive bidding process. Without competing offers, it's harder to ensure the government is getting the best possible value for taxpayer dollars.

Public Impact

The Lebanon Air Force (LAF) will benefit from modernized digital and VIDAR technology, enhancing operational capabilities. The contract delivers essential hardware and services for a critical fleet conversion. The geographic impact is primarily focused on Lebanon, supporting its defense infrastructure. Workforce implications may include training for LAF personnel on new technologies and potential support roles for Insitu, Inc.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award limits price competition and potential for cost savings.
  • Lack of transparency in the justification for sole-source award.
  • Long performance period could introduce risks related to technology obsolescence or changing requirements.

Positive Signals

  • Firm-fixed-price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
  • Focus on modernization addresses potential operational inefficiencies of analog systems.
  • Award to a known entity (Insitu, Inc.) may imply existing familiarity or capability.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS code 541330), which encompasses firms providing engineering consulting and services. The market for defense modernization and technology conversion is significant, driven by the need for militaries worldwide to maintain technological superiority and operational efficiency. Insitu, Inc. is known for its unmanned aircraft systems and related services, suggesting this contract leverages their expertise in aviation technology and integration. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve other fleet modernization or technology integration projects within defense sectors, which often involve substantial investments.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small business participation (ss and sb fields) is false, and there is no mention of small business set-asides. This suggests that the prime contractor, Insitu, Inc., is likely not a small business, and the contract was not specifically awarded to encourage small business involvement. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses are not detailed in the provided data, but typically, larger prime contractors may engage small businesses for specialized components or services. The overall impact on the small business ecosystem appears minimal for this specific award, as it was not a set-aside contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Navy, which awarded the delivery order. As a firm-fixed-price contract, oversight would focus on ensuring the contractor meets the defined scope, schedule, and quality requirements. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award. Accountability measures would be tied to the contract's performance clauses and delivery schedules. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

  • Defense Technology Modernization Programs
  • Military Aviation Fleet Upgrades
  • International Military Assistance Programs
  • Digital Transformation Initiatives in Government

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of competitive bidding
  • Potential for cost overruns if not properly managed
  • Technology obsolescence risk over long performance period

Tags

defense, department-of-defense, insitu-inc, sole-source, engineering-services, aviation-technology, fleet-modernization, digital-conversion, firm-fixed-price, lebanon, delivery-order

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.2 million to INSITU, INC.. THE PURPOSE OF THIS DELIVERY ORDER IS TO PROCURE HARDWARE AND SERVICES TO CONVERT THE LEBANON AIR FORCE (LAF) FLEET FROM ANALOG TO DIGITAL AND THE ABILITY TO OPERATE THE NEW DIGITAL AND VIDAR TECHNOLOGY.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INSITU, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-03-08. End: 2027-01-26.

What is Insitu, Inc.'s track record with similar defense modernization contracts, particularly those involving fleet-wide technology conversions?

Insitu, Inc. is primarily known for its unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) and associated services. While they have a strong track record in aviation technology and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) solutions, specific details on their experience with large-scale, analog-to-digital fleet conversion projects for air forces, especially outside of their core UAS offerings, are not readily available in public contract databases. Their expertise likely lies in integrating new digital systems and potentially providing training and support. However, the scale and nature of converting an entire fleet from analog to digital, beyond their typical UAS product lines, would require a deeper dive into their project portfolio and past performance on similar, large-value contracts to fully assess their capability and experience in this specific domain.

How does the $14.2 million cost compare to similar analog-to-digital fleet conversion projects for air forces?

Benchmarking the $14.2 million cost for this analog-to-digital conversion is challenging without more specific details on the scope of the Lebanon Air Force (LAF) fleet, the complexity of the required hardware and software, and the extent of services included. Fleet conversion projects can vary significantly in cost based on the number and type of aircraft, the sophistication of the new technology (e.g., VIDAR systems), and the level of integration required. Typically, such modernization efforts for military fleets are substantial investments. Without access to data on comparable international military fleet conversion contracts, especially those involving similar aircraft types and technological upgrades, it is difficult to definitively state whether $14.2 million represents a competitive price or indicates potential overspending. The sole-source nature of this award further complicates direct value comparisons.

What are the primary risks associated with this sole-source contract, and how are they being mitigated?

The primary risk associated with this sole-source contract is the potential for inflated pricing due to the lack of competitive bidding, which can lead to suboptimal value for taxpayer money. Another risk is that the government may not have explored all available technological solutions or potentially more cost-effective alternatives that a competitive process might have uncovered. Mitigation strategies are not explicitly detailed in the provided data but would typically involve rigorous negotiation of terms and pricing by the contracting officers, clear definition of deliverables and performance standards, and robust oversight throughout the contract's performance period. The firm-fixed-price structure also shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor, which is a form of mitigation for the government regarding budget certainty, assuming the initial price was fair.

What is the expected impact of this contract on the operational effectiveness of the Lebanon Air Force?

This contract is expected to significantly enhance the operational effectiveness of the Lebanon Air Force (LAF) by transitioning its fleet from outdated analog systems to modern digital technology, including VIDAR capabilities. Digital systems generally offer improved reliability, enhanced data processing, better communication, and greater interoperability with other digital platforms. VIDAR technology, often associated with advanced imaging and sensor capabilities, can provide superior situational awareness and targeting information. This modernization should enable the LAF to perform its missions more efficiently and effectively, potentially improving intelligence gathering, reconnaissance, and overall mission success rates in various operational environments. The transition is crucial for maintaining a capable and modern air force.

How does this contract align with broader trends in defense spending and technological modernization within allied nations?

This contract aligns with a global trend in defense spending focused on technological modernization and digital transformation. Allied nations are increasingly investing in upgrading legacy military hardware and systems to incorporate advanced digital capabilities, artificial intelligence, and enhanced sensor technologies to maintain a competitive edge and improve operational efficiency. The move from analog to digital is a fundamental step in this process, enabling better data management, secure communications, and integration with networked warfare concepts. The specific focus on aviation platforms and advanced sensor technology like VIDAR reflects a broader strategic push across many defense sectors to leverage cutting-edge technology for enhanced intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance (ISR), and combat effectiveness. This contract represents a localized application of a widespread international defense modernization imperative.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: THE Boeing Company

Address: 118 E COLUMBIA RIVER WAY, BINGEN, WA, 98605

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,195,215

Exercised Options: $14,195,215

Current Obligation: $14,195,215

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 3

Total Subaward Amount: $3,196,172

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0001922D0038

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2024-03-08

Current End Date: 2027-01-26

Potential End Date: 2027-01-26 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-14

More Contracts from Insitu, Inc.

View all Insitu, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending