DoD Awards $55.1M for Sonobuoys to ERAPSCO, Lacking Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $55,104,120 ($55.1M)
Contractor: Erapsco
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2022-04-30
End Date: 2025-01-30
Contract Duration: 1,006 days
Daily Burn Rate: $54.8K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: FY22 ORDER FOR AN/SSQ-101B SONOBUOYS UNDER CONTRACT N0001919D0032.
Place of Performance
Location: COLUMBIA CITY, WHITLEY County, INDIANA, 46725
State: Indiana Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $55.1 million to ERAPSCO for work described as: FY22 ORDER FOR AN/SSQ-101B SONOBUOYS UNDER CONTRACT N0001919D0032. Key points: 1. Significant award for sonobuoys, a critical naval defense component. 2. Sole-source award to ERAPSCO raises concerns about price discovery. 3. Long-term contract (2022-2025) suggests ongoing need for these systems. 4. Manufacturing sector (NAICS 334511) is heavily reliant on defense contracts.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $55.1M for sonobuoys is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price is optimal compared to potential market rates for similar systems.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to ERAPSCO. This lack of competition limits price discovery and may lead to higher costs for taxpayers.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being expended without the benefit of competitive pricing, potentially resulting in overpayment for these critical defense components.
Public Impact
Naval readiness may be impacted if pricing is not optimized. Potential for increased defense spending due to lack of competition. Dependence on a single supplier could create supply chain vulnerabilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Sole-source award
- Potential for inflated pricing
Positive Signals
- Critical defense procurement
- Long-term contract ensures supply
Sector Analysis
This award falls within the defense manufacturing sector, specifically instruments for search, detection, and navigation. Defense spending in this area is often characterized by high R&D costs and specialized production, but competition is usually sought to control costs.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further investigation would be needed to assess small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Navy awarded this contract. Oversight would focus on ensuring the necessity of the sole-source award and the reasonableness of the price negotiated, especially given the lack of competitive pressure.
Related Government Programs
- Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of competition
- Potential for overpricing
- Limited transparency in price discovery
Tags
search-detection-navigation-guidance-aer, department-of-defense, in, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $55.1 million to ERAPSCO. FY22 ORDER FOR AN/SSQ-101B SONOBUOYS UNDER CONTRACT N0001919D0032.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ERAPSCO.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $55.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-04-30. End: 2025-01-30.
What is the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis instead of seeking competitive bids?
The justification for a sole-source award typically involves factors such as unique capabilities, urgent need, or lack of available alternatives. Without further documentation, it's unclear why competition was bypassed for these sonobuoys. This decision warrants scrutiny to ensure it serves the government's best interest and doesn't simply reflect convenience or a pre-existing relationship.
What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source procurement of critical defense equipment like sonobuoys?
Sole-source procurements carry risks of inflated pricing due to the absence of competitive pressure, potentially leading to inefficient use of taxpayer funds. There's also a risk of reduced innovation and a lack of incentive for the sole provider to improve quality or efficiency. Furthermore, reliance on a single supplier can create supply chain vulnerabilities if that supplier faces production issues or geopolitical challenges.
How does the lack of competition impact the long-term value and effectiveness of this sonobuoy procurement for the Department of Defense?
The lack of competition directly impacts long-term value by potentially increasing the overall cost of acquiring sonobuoys over the contract's duration. Without competitive benchmarking, it's harder to ensure the government is receiving the best possible technology and pricing. This could lead to reduced budget allocation for other critical needs or a lower quantity of sonobuoys acquired for the same investment, potentially affecting operational effectiveness.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Navigational, Measuring, Electromedical, and Control Instruments Manufacturing › Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: COMM/DETECT/COHERENT RADIATION
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: N0001919R0001
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 4868 EAST PARK 30 DR, COLUMBIA CITY, IN, 46725
Business Categories: Category Business, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $55,104,120
Exercised Options: $55,104,120
Current Obligation: $55,104,120
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 42
Total Subaward Amount: $21,744,707
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N0001919D0032
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-04-30
Current End Date: 2025-01-30
Potential End Date: 2025-01-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-11-22
More Contracts from Erapsco
- FY23 Order for An/Ssq-53g (UK), An/Ssq-53g (ROK), An/Ssq-53g (bahrain), An/Ssq-62f (UK), An/Ssq-62f(rok), & An/Ssq-101b (UK) — $305.9M (Department of Defense)
- An/Ssq-53f Sonobuoy — $209.7M (Department of Defense)
- FY20 Production Sonobuoys Order — $204.6M (Department of Defense)
- An/Ssq-53g and An/Ssq-125 (FY21) — $181.4M (Department of Defense)
- (FY19) Production Sonobuoys — $175.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)