DoD Awards Boeing $27.8M for Aircraft Refurbishment, Lacking Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $27,850,713 ($27.9M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2021-01-22

End Date: 2026-04-30

Contract Duration: 1,924 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.5K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: FY21 CAPSULE REFURBS

Place of Performance

Location: SAINT LOUIS, SAINT LOUIS County, MISSOURI, 63134

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $27.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: FY21 CAPSULE REFURBS Key points: 1. Significant contract value awarded to a single, large defense contractor. 2. Lack of competition raises concerns about price discovery and potential overspending. 3. Long contract duration (over 5 years) increases exposure to market fluctuations. 4. Aircraft manufacturing sector is critical but often dominated by a few key players.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The $27.8M award for aircraft refurbishment lacks a clear benchmark due to its sole-source nature. Without competitive bids, it's difficult to assess if the pricing is optimal compared to potential market alternatives or similar past contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to The Boeing Company. This limits price discovery mechanisms and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers as there is no competitive pressure to offer the best price.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition may result in taxpayers paying a premium for these refurbishment services, as the government did not explore potentially more cost-effective options.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying for aircraft refurbishment due to the lack of competitive bidding. The long-term nature of the contract could lock the government into a specific vendor, limiting future flexibility. Dependence on a single contractor for critical aircraft maintenance could pose a risk to operational readiness if issues arise.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Long contract duration
  • High dollar value

Positive Signals

  • Award to established prime contractor
  • Firm fixed price contract

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically aircraft manufacturing and maintenance. Spending in this area is substantial, driven by national security needs, but often characterized by high barriers to entry and limited competition among major aerospace firms.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to The Boeing Company, a large prime contractor, and there is no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses in the provided data. This suggests minimal direct benefit to the small business sector from this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded via a delivery order under an existing contract, suggesting some level of prior review. However, the lack of competition for this specific order warrants scrutiny to ensure fair pricing and value for taxpayer funds.

Related Government Programs

  • Aircraft Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Long contract duration
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Limited small business participation
  • Sole-source award

Tags

aircraft-manufacturing, department-of-defense, mo, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $27.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. FY21 CAPSULE REFURBS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $27.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-01-22. End: 2026-04-30.

What justification was provided for not competing this significant refurbishment contract, and does it align with federal procurement regulations for sole-source awards?

The provided data does not include the justification for the sole-source award. Federal regulations typically require a compelling reason, such as unique capabilities or urgent need, to bypass full and open competition. Further investigation into the contract file is needed to ascertain the specific justification and its validity.

How does the firm fixed price of this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar aircraft refurbishment services, considering the lack of competitive bids?

Without competitive bids, establishing a precise benchmark is challenging. However, the firm fixed price aims to transfer risk to the contractor. A post-award analysis comparing the negotiated price against historical data for similar services, adjusted for inflation and scope, would be necessary to assess value.

What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source, long-term contract for critical aircraft refurbishment, particularly concerning cost escalation and vendor performance?

Sole-source, long-term contracts carry risks of cost escalation if not properly managed, as the government lacks competitive leverage. Vendor performance can also be a concern, as there's less incentive for the contractor to exceed expectations. Robust oversight and clear performance metrics are crucial to mitigate these risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: GUIDED MISSLES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6200 JS MCDONNELL BLVD, SAINT LOUIS, MO, 63134

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $27,954,120

Exercised Options: $27,850,713

Current Obligation: $27,850,713

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 5

Total Subaward Amount: $10,630,286

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0001916G0001

IDV Type: BOA

Timeline

Start Date: 2021-01-22

Current End Date: 2026-04-30

Potential End Date: 2026-04-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-11-13

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending