Boeing Awarded $11.8M for Navy Aircraft Manufacturing, Lacking Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,810,368 ($11.8M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2020-08-06

End Date: 2026-03-31

Contract Duration: 2,063 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.7K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: CAPSULE REFURBISHMENT

Place of Performance

Location: SAINT LOUIS, SAINT LOUIS County, MISSOURI, 63134

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.8 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: CAPSULE REFURBISHMENT Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $11.8 million awarded to a single large business. 2. Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpricing and reduced innovation. 3. The contract is for aircraft manufacturing, a sector with established players. 4. Long duration of 2063 days suggests a substantial, ongoing requirement.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $11.8 million for aircraft manufacturing is difficult to benchmark without specific details on the refurbishment scope. However, the lack of competition suggests potential for prices above market rates.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and may result in higher costs for taxpayers compared to a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition means taxpayers may be paying a premium for these aircraft refurbishment services.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying due to the lack of competitive bidding. The Navy's reliance on a single provider could create future dependency. Limited transparency into the pricing structure due to sole-source nature.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 57 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Sole-source award

Positive Signals

  • Award to established large business
  • Firm fixed price contract type

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Aircraft Manufacturing sector, which is dominated by large aerospace companies. Spending benchmarks for refurbishment can vary widely based on the complexity and age of the aircraft.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to The Boeing Company, a large business. There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this specific procurement, missing an opportunity for their participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants scrutiny to ensure fair pricing and value for taxpayer dollars. Oversight should focus on validating the necessity of the sole-source justification and the reasonableness of the price.

Related Government Programs

  • Aircraft Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for inflated pricing
  • Sole-source award
  • Limited transparency

Tags

aircraft-manufacturing, department-of-defense, mo, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.8 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. CAPSULE REFURBISHMENT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-08-06. End: 2026-03-31.

What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and how was the price determined to be fair and reasonable?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves factors like unique capabilities, urgent need, or lack of viable alternatives. Price reasonableness is usually assessed through cost analysis, comparison to historical data, or market research. Without the specific justification document, it's impossible to confirm the rationale or the methods used to ensure a fair price for this $11.8 million contract.

What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source contract for aircraft refurbishment, particularly concerning long-term maintenance and future procurements?

Sole-source contracts can lead to vendor lock-in, where the government becomes dependent on a single supplier, potentially limiting future negotiation leverage and increasing costs. For aircraft refurbishment, this could mean higher prices for parts, specialized labor, and follow-on services. It also reduces opportunities for innovation and competition that could drive down costs or improve service quality over the life of the aircraft.

How does this contract align with the Department of Defense's goals for promoting competition and ensuring cost-effectiveness in its procurements?

This sole-source award appears to contradict the Department of Defense's stated goals of maximizing competition to achieve best value and cost savings. While sole-source awards are sometimes necessary, they should be exceptions rather than the norm. The lack of competition here suggests a potential missed opportunity to leverage market forces for better pricing and potentially more innovative solutions for aircraft refurbishment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: GUIDED MISSLES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6200 JS MCDONNELL BLVD, SAINT LOUIS, MO, 63134

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,810,368

Exercised Options: $11,810,368

Current Obligation: $11,810,368

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 6

Total Subaward Amount: $7,114,906

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0001916G0001

IDV Type: BOA

Timeline

Start Date: 2020-08-06

Current End Date: 2026-03-31

Potential End Date: 2026-03-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-01-12

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending