Navy awards Boeing $1.8B for MQ-25 EMD, a critical step in carrier aviation modernization

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $1,805,224,988 ($1.8B)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2018-08-30

End Date: 2028-12-30

Contract Duration: 3,775 days

Daily Burn Rate: $478.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: MQ-25 EMD

Place of Performance

Location: SAINT LOUIS, SAINT LOUIS County, MISSOURI, 63134

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $1.81 billion to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: MQ-25 EMD Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in advanced unmanned aerial refueling capabilities. 2. Sole-source award to Boeing suggests unique capabilities or limited market alternatives for this specific phase. 3. Fixed Price Incentive contract type aims to balance cost control with contractor performance incentives. 4. Long contract duration of over 9 years indicates a complex development and integration process. 5. Focus on Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) points to a crucial, high-risk phase of the program. 6. The contract's scope is central to the Navy's strategic vision for future carrier operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The $1.8 billion award for the MQ-25 EMD program is substantial, reflecting the complexity and strategic importance of developing a carrier-based unmanned aerial refueling system. While direct comparisons for such a novel capability are limited, the fixed-price incentive structure suggests an effort to manage costs while encouraging performance. Benchmarking this specific EMD phase against other large-scale defense development programs indicates a potentially competitive price point given the technological advancements required. The total obligation is spread over several years, allowing for phased funding aligned with development milestones.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis to The Boeing Company. This approach is typically employed when a single source possesses unique capabilities, intellectual property, or has demonstrated superior performance in prior phases, making full and open competition impractical or detrimental to program objectives. The limited competition at this EMD stage may reflect the specialized nature of the MQ-25's requirements and Boeing's established role in its development.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can limit price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs for taxpayers compared to fully competed contracts. However, in cases of highly specialized or developmental procurements, it can also ensure the selection of the most capable provider to achieve critical program goals efficiently.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Navy's carrier strike groups, which will gain enhanced operational flexibility and extended range through aerial refueling. The contract delivers the Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) phase for the MQ-25 Stingray, a crucial step towards operational deployment. Geographic impact is primarily centered around Boeing's facilities in Missouri, with potential ripple effects on the aerospace supply chain nationwide. Workforce implications include skilled engineering, manufacturing, and testing roles within Boeing and its subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source nature of the award limits competitive pressure on pricing.
  • Long-term nature of the contract introduces potential for cost overruns if not managed tightly.
  • Technological complexity of developing a carrier-capable unmanned system carries inherent development risks.

Positive Signals

  • Fixed Price Incentive contract type incentivizes contractor performance and cost control.
  • Award to an established defense contractor like Boeing suggests a high likelihood of technical success.
  • The MQ-25 program is critical for future naval aviation capabilities, indicating strong program support.

Sector Analysis

The MQ-25 program falls within the aerospace and defense manufacturing sector, specifically focusing on unmanned aerial systems (UAS). This sector is characterized by high R&D investment, stringent performance requirements, and significant government procurement. The market for carrier-based unmanned systems is nascent, with the MQ-25 being a pioneering effort. Comparable spending benchmarks would likely be found in other large-scale defense platform development programs, which often run into billions of dollars over their lifecycle.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to include specific small business set-asides, as indicated by 'sb': false. However, large prime contractors like Boeing are typically required to meet subcontracting goals for small businesses. The successful execution of this EMD phase will likely lead to future production contracts where small business participation could be more significant, particularly in specialized component manufacturing and support services.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will be provided by the Department of the Navy, likely through the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR). The fixed-price incentive structure includes mechanisms for monitoring cost performance against targets and rewarding efficient completion. Transparency will be managed through contract reporting requirements. The Inspector General of the Department of Defense may conduct audits and investigations as deemed necessary to ensure proper use of funds.

Related Government Programs

  • MQ-28 Ghost Bat (Boeing)
  • Unmanned Carrier Aviation
  • Naval Aviation Modernization Programs
  • Defense Development Contracts

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award may limit competitive pricing.
  • Complexity of carrier integration presents technical risks.
  • Long contract duration increases potential for cost escalation.

Tags

defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, aircraft-manufacturing, unmanned-aerial-vehicle, acquisition, major-defense-contract, fixed-price-incentive, sole-source, missouri, emd, mq-25

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $1.81 billion to THE BOEING COMPANY. MQ-25 EMD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $1.81 billion.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2018-08-30. End: 2028-12-30.

What is the historical performance of The Boeing Company on similar large-scale defense development contracts?

The Boeing Company has a long and extensive history of delivering complex defense platforms, including numerous aircraft development programs for the U.S. military. While specific performance metrics vary by program, Boeing has a track record of successfully completing major development contracts, albeit sometimes with schedule delays or cost adjustments common in cutting-edge defense projects. For instance, their involvement in programs like the T-7A Red Hawk trainer and various fighter jet programs demonstrates their capability in advanced aerospace engineering and manufacturing. The MQ-25 EMD contract builds upon this experience, leveraging their expertise in large aircraft production and systems integration. However, like many large defense contractors, Boeing has faced scrutiny on specific programs regarding cost growth and schedule adherence, underscoring the importance of robust oversight for the MQ-25.

How does the $1.8 billion EMD cost compare to the projected total program cost for the MQ-25?

The $1.8 billion awarded for the MQ-25 EMD phase represents the initial, high-risk investment in developing and proving the system's design and capabilities. EMD contracts typically cover the most intensive design, prototyping, testing, and risk-reduction activities. The total program cost, encompassing subsequent production, deployment, and sustainment phases, is expected to be significantly higher, potentially reaching tens of billions of dollars over the system's lifecycle. While the EMD cost is substantial, it is a necessary precursor to full-rate production. Specific projections for the total program cost vary, but this initial investment is crucial for validating the technology and operational concept before committing to large-scale manufacturing.

What are the primary technical risks associated with the MQ-25 EMD contract?

The MQ-25 EMD contract addresses several significant technical risks inherent in developing a novel, carrier-based unmanned aerial refueling platform. Key risks include achieving reliable autonomous aerial refueling operations in the demanding carrier environment, ensuring seamless integration with existing carrier air traffic control systems and aircraft, and meeting stringent airworthiness and safety requirements for operation near manned aircraft. Developing the advanced sensor suites for navigation and threat detection, along with robust communication links for command and control, also presents technical challenges. Furthermore, ensuring the durability and maintainability of the airframe and its systems for carrier operations, including catapult launches and arrested recoveries, is a critical risk area that the EMD phase aims to mitigate through rigorous design and testing.

What is the expected timeline for the MQ-25 to become operational based on this EMD contract?

The MQ-25 EMD contract, with an estimated completion date of December 2028, sets the stage for the system's eventual operational capability. The EMD phase is designed to mature the design, complete government testing, and prepare for production. Following the successful completion of EMD, the program typically moves into low-rate initial production (LRIP) and then full-rate production, followed by operational testing and initial operational capability (IOC) declarations. Given the contract's end date, it is reasonable to expect that the MQ-25 could achieve IOC in the early to mid-2030s, assuming no major setbacks in subsequent phases. The Navy's specific timelines for fielding the MQ-25 will depend on the outcomes of the EMD phase and the pace of subsequent production and integration efforts.

How does the fixed-price incentive (FPI) contract type influence cost management for this program?

The Fixed Price Incentive (FPI) contract type for the MQ-25 EMD program aims to provide a balance between cost control and performance motivation. In an FPI contract, the final price is determined by the contractor's performance against target cost and target profit objectives. If the contractor achieves a lower final cost than the target cost, both the government and the contractor share in the savings according to a pre-negotiated formula (the "sharing ratio"). Conversely, if the final cost exceeds the target cost, the contractor bears a portion of the overrun, up to a ceiling price. This structure incentivizes the contractor to manage costs effectively and achieve performance targets, as their profit is directly linked to their ability to meet or beat the negotiated cost and performance goals, thereby aligning the contractor's interests with those of the government.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTC – National Defense R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N0001917R0087

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE (L)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6200 JS MCDONNELL BLVD, SAINT LOUIS, MO, 63134

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $1,975,297,496

Exercised Options: $1,975,297,496

Current Obligation: $1,805,224,988

Actual Outlays: $134,212,163

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 1008

Total Subaward Amount: $627,639,348

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2018-08-30

Current End Date: 2028-12-30

Potential End Date: 2028-12-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-01-06

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending