DoD Awards Boeing $93.3M for Harpoon Lot 88 Missile Production

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $93,308,473 ($93.3M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2013-12-17

End Date: 2015-07-31

Contract Duration: 591 days

Daily Burn Rate: $157.9K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: HARPOON LOT 88

Place of Performance

Location: SAINT LOUIS, SAINT LOUIS County, MISSOURI, 63134

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $93.3 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: HARPOON LOT 88 Key points: 1. Significant award to a single, established defense contractor. 2. Focus on guided missile manufacturing within the defense sector. 3. Potential for cost efficiencies through firm fixed-price contract. 4. Lack of competition raises questions about optimal pricing.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $93.3 million for 591 days of performance is substantial. Without specific per-unit cost data or benchmarks for similar missile systems, a precise value assessment is difficult. However, the firm fixed-price structure aims to control costs.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source or limited competition scenario. This approach may be justified by specialized capabilities or existing production lines, but it limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition may result in a higher price than if multiple vendors had bid, impacting taxpayer value.

Public Impact

Ensures continued availability of a key defense asset. Supports jobs within the aerospace and defense manufacturing sector. Highlights reliance on established prime contractors for critical systems.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Sole-source award

Positive Signals

  • Firm fixed-price contract
  • Established contractor

Sector Analysis

This award falls within the Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing sector, a critical component of national defense spending. Benchmarks for similar missile production contracts are often proprietary but typically involve significant R&D and manufacturing costs.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates no specific set-aside for small businesses. Large defense contracts like this often involve extensive subcontracting, which may provide opportunities for small businesses, but direct award analysis shows no SMB participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The award is a definitive contract from the Department of the Navy, suggesting established procurement processes. However, the lack of competition warrants scrutiny to ensure fair pricing and effective use of funds.

Related Government Programs

  • Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award limits price competition.
  • Potential for higher costs due to lack of bidding.
  • Need for robust justification for non-competitive procurement.
  • Lack of transparency on per-unit cost benchmarks.

Tags

guided-missile-and-space-vehicle-manufac, department-of-defense, mo, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $93.3 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. HARPOON LOT 88

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $93.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-12-17. End: 2015-07-31.

What is the historical cost performance of the Harpoon missile program under similar contract types?

Analyzing historical cost data for the Harpoon missile program, particularly under previous firm fixed-price contracts, would provide crucial insights. This would help determine if the current award reflects competitive pricing trends or potential cost overruns. Without this historical context, assessing the value proposition is challenging.

Are there any viable alternative missile systems or manufacturers that could have been considered?

Investigating alternative missile systems and manufacturers is essential to understand the justification for a sole-source award. If other capable suppliers exist, even with different technological approaches, the lack of competition raises concerns about market dynamics and potential price inflation. A thorough market analysis should precede such awards.

How does the per-unit cost of this Harpoon missile lot compare to industry benchmarks for similar weapon systems?

Benchmarking the per-unit cost against similar guided missile systems is vital for evaluating cost-effectiveness. While specific data is often classified, comparing to publicly available information on comparable systems, adjusted for complexity and features, can reveal potential overpricing. This comparison helps ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingGuided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: GUIDED MISSLES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: N0001913R0030

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6200 JS MCDONNELL BLVD, SAINT LOUIS, MO, 63134

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $93,308,473

Exercised Options: $93,308,473

Current Obligation: $93,308,473

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 24

Total Subaward Amount: $4,315,597

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2013-12-17

Current End Date: 2015-07-31

Potential End Date: 2015-07-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2024-06-26

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending