Navy Acquires Two Boeing C-40A Aircraft for $371.7M, Lacking Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $371,691,606 ($371.7M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2012-12-20

End Date: 2020-08-31

Contract Duration: 2,811 days

Daily Burn Rate: $132.2K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: PROCUREMENT OF 2 C-40A CLIPPER AIRCRAFT FOR THE U.S. NAVY

Place of Performance

Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73135

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $371.7 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: PROCUREMENT OF 2 C-40A CLIPPER AIRCRAFT FOR THE U.S. NAVY Key points: 1. High cost for two aircraft suggests potential for overpayment. 2. Sole-source procurement limits price discovery and competitive advantage. 3. Long contract duration (2012-2020) may indicate schedule overruns or scope creep. 4. Aircraft manufacturing sector is complex, but competition is usually feasible.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The total award of $371.7 million for two C-40A aircraft is substantial. Without competitive bids, it's difficult to benchmark against similar procurements, but the per-unit cost appears high.

Cost Per Unit: $185.85 million per aircraft

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This significantly limits price discovery and likely resulted in a higher price than if competition had been pursued.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may have overpaid due to the lack of competitive bidding, as the government did not leverage market forces to secure the best possible price.

Public Impact

Military readiness potentially impacted by delayed or costly aircraft acquisition. Taxpayer funds allocated to a single vendor without exploring alternative, potentially lower-cost options. Lack of transparency in the procurement process raises questions about efficiency and value.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source procurement
  • High total cost
  • Lack of competition
  • Long contract duration

Positive Signals

  • Firm fixed price contract type
  • Aircraft acquired for Navy use

Sector Analysis

The acquisition of specialized military aircraft falls within the aerospace and defense sector. Benchmarks for similar large aircraft procurements are often highly variable due to customization and specific mission requirements, but competition is typically sought to ensure value.

Small Business Impact

This procurement was awarded to The Boeing Company, a large prime contractor. There is no indication of small business participation in this specific contract award, suggesting opportunities for subcontracting were not prioritized or disclosed.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants further oversight to ensure the price paid was justified and that future procurements of similar assets explore competitive avenues to maximize taxpayer value.

Related Government Programs

  • Aircraft Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • High unit cost
  • Sole-source award
  • Potential for overpayment
  • Limited transparency

Tags

aircraft-manufacturing, department-of-defense, ok, definitive-contract, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $371.7 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. PROCUREMENT OF 2 C-40A CLIPPER AIRCRAFT FOR THE U.S. NAVY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $371.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-12-20. End: 2020-08-31.

What justification was provided for the sole-source award of the C-40A aircraft, and were any market research efforts conducted to assess competitive options?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED,' suggesting a sole-source justification was applied. However, the specific rationale or documentation supporting this decision, such as urgent need or unique capability, is not detailed. Without this information, it's impossible to fully assess if competitive alternatives were genuinely unavailable or if market research was insufficient.

How does the per-unit cost of $185.85 million for the C-40A compare to similar military transport aircraft procured competitively around the same period?

Benchmarking the $185.85 million per-unit cost is challenging without specific comparable aircraft data. However, this figure appears high for transport aircraft. Competitively procured aircraft of similar size and capability, like the C-130J or even commercial derivatives used for military purposes, often come in at lower price points, especially when economies of scale from competition are realized.

What is the long-term operational and maintenance cost associated with these C-40A aircraft, and how does it compare to the initial procurement cost?

The provided data focuses solely on the procurement cost and contract period. Information regarding the total cost of ownership, including sustainment, upgrades, fuel, and personnel, is not available. Understanding these long-term costs is crucial for a complete assessment of the overall value and financial impact on the Navy and taxpayers beyond the initial acquisition.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: N0001912R0023

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6001 S AIR DEPOT BLVD, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK, 73135

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $375,344,021

Exercised Options: $371,691,606

Current Obligation: $371,691,606

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 19

Total Subaward Amount: $4,027,227

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2012-12-20

Current End Date: 2020-08-31

Potential End Date: 2020-08-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2020-10-07

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending