DoD awards $48.9M for E-6B aircraft modifications to Rockwell Collins, facing limited competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $48,891,414 ($48.9M)

Contractor: Rockwell Collins, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-09-11

End Date: 2014-02-28

Contract Duration: 1,631 days

Daily Burn Rate: $30.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: E-6B BLOCK IA ECP UCA TAS::17 1804::TAS

Place of Performance

Location: CEDAR RAPIDS, LINN County, IOWA, 52498

State: Iowa Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $48.9 million to ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC. for work described as: E-6B BLOCK IA ECP UCA TAS::17 1804::TAS Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $48.9 million for aircraft modifications. 2. Sole-source award to Rockwell Collins raises concerns about competition. 3. Potential for cost overruns given the Cost Plus Incentive Fee contract type. 4. Sector focus on Defense, specifically aircraft parts manufacturing.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $48.9 million for aircraft modifications appears high, especially considering it was not competed. Benchmarking against similar sole-source modifications is difficult, but the lack of competition suggests potential for inflated pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, indicating a lack of competitive bidding. This significantly limits price discovery and may lead to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition likely resulted in a higher price than could have been achieved through a competitive process, impacting taxpayer funds.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may have overpaid due to the lack of competitive bidding. The E-6B aircraft is critical for strategic communications, making its maintenance and upgrades essential. Dependence on a single contractor for specialized modifications can create long-term risks.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Cost Plus Incentive Fee contract type
  • Lack of transparency in pricing

Positive Signals

  • Essential military aircraft upgrade
  • Contract awarded to established defense contractor

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically focusing on aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment manufacturing. Spending in this area is critical for maintaining military readiness, but competitive sourcing is crucial for cost efficiency.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Rockwell Collins, Inc., a large defense contractor. There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this specific sole-source award, limiting opportunities for them.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants further oversight to ensure the pricing is reasonable and that future requirements are competed whenever possible to maximize value for taxpayers.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competition and price discovery.
  • Cost Plus Incentive Fee contract type can lead to cost overruns.
  • Lack of small business participation.
  • Potential for contractor lock-in.
  • Limited transparency on pricing justification.

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, ia, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $48.9 million to ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC.. E-6B BLOCK IA ECP UCA TAS::17 1804::TAS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $48.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-09-11. End: 2014-02-28.

What is the justification for the sole-source award, and were alternative competitive strategies considered?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities or proprietary technology held by a single contractor. However, without detailed documentation, it's difficult to ascertain if alternative competitive strategies were thoroughly explored. Agencies should provide clear rationales and evidence that competition was not feasible or advantageous.

How does the Cost Plus Incentive Fee structure impact the final cost and contractor performance?

A Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract aims to incentivize the contractor to control costs by sharing savings or cost overruns with the government based on performance targets. While intended to manage expenses, the incentive structure can still lead to higher final costs if targets are not met or if the base cost is inflated. Close monitoring is essential.

What is the long-term strategic impact of relying on a single vendor for critical aircraft modifications?

Long-term reliance on a single vendor for critical modifications can create a dependency that reduces future negotiating power and potentially increases costs. It also poses a risk if the vendor faces financial difficulties or decides to exit the market. Diversifying suppliers or developing in-house capabilities can mitigate these risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: ELECTRICAL/ELECTRONIC EQPT COMPNTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: N0001908R0111

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: RTX Corp (UEI: 001344142)

Address: 400 COLLINS ROAD NE, CEDAR RAPIDS, IA, 52406

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $48,891,414

Exercised Options: $48,891,414

Current Obligation: $48,891,414

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2009-09-11

Current End Date: 2014-02-28

Potential End Date: 2014-02-28 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2019-09-20

More Contracts from Rockwell Collins, Inc.

View all Rockwell Collins, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending