Honeywell International Inc. awarded $13.5M contract for helicopter rotor blades and drive mechanisms by Naval Air Systems Command

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,500,401 ($13.5M)

Contractor: Honeywell International Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-06-11

End Date: 2009-01-30

Contract Duration: 2,060 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200309!000034!1700!AT729 !NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0001903C3266 !A!N! !N! !20030611!20040831!009533998!009533998!139691877!N!HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC !15001 NE 36 ST !REDMOND !WA!98052!22230!037!06!EL MONTE !LOS ANGELES !CALIFORNIA!+000002786986!N!N!000015777302!1615!HELICOPTER ROTOR BLADES, DRIVE MECHANISMS & COMPON!A1C!OTHER AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT !1AHJ!CH-46 SEA KNIGHT !336413!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!1!005!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!D!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: OLATHE, JOHNSON County, KANSAS, 66061

State: Kansas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $13.5 million to HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. for work described as: 200309!000034!1700!AT729 !NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0001903C3266 !A!N! !N! !20030611!20040831!009533998!009533998!139691877!N!HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC !15001 NE 36 ST !REDMOND !WA!98052!22230!037!06!EL MONTE !LOS A… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for critical helicopter components, indicating a need for specialized manufacturing and maintenance capabilities. 2. The contract value of $13.5 million suggests a significant procurement for a specific aircraft platform. 3. Full and open competition was utilized, implying a robust market for these specialized parts. 4. The duration of the contract (2060 days) points to a long-term need for these components. 5. The award to Honeywell International Inc., a known defense contractor, suggests a reliance on established industry players for complex aerospace systems.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $13.5 million for helicopter rotor blades and drive mechanisms appears reasonable given the specialized nature of aerospace components and the long contract duration. Benchmarking against similar procurements for complex aircraft parts would provide further context, but the full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing environment was sought.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely solicited and evaluated. The presence of multiple bidders in the aerospace component market suggests a healthy level of competition, which typically drives better pricing and innovation.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition as it generally leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified vendors, ensuring the government receives the best value for its investment.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Navy's aviation units that operate CH-46 Sea Knight helicopters, ensuring operational readiness. The contract delivers essential components for helicopter maintenance and repair, supporting the sustainment of critical military assets. The geographic impact is primarily centered around the contractor's facilities in Redmond, Washington, and potentially their manufacturing sites. Workforce implications include skilled manufacturing and engineering jobs within Honeywell International Inc. and its potential subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Aerospace and Defense sector, specifically focusing on aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment manufacturing. The market for such specialized components is characterized by high barriers to entry due to stringent quality and performance requirements. Spending in this area is critical for maintaining military aviation readiness and technological superiority.

Small Business Impact

While this contract was awarded to a large prime contractor, Honeywell International Inc., there is potential for small business participation through subcontracting opportunities. The extent of small business involvement would depend on Honeywell's subcontracting plan and the availability of qualified small businesses for specific components or services.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), ensuring compliance with contract terms, quality standards, and delivery schedules. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics may not always be publicly disclosed.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

defense, department-of-defense, naval-air-systems-command, helicopter-parts, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, large-contract, aerospace, manufacturing, washington, honeywell-international-inc

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $13.5 million to HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.. 200309!000034!1700!AT729 !NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0001903C3266 !A!N! !N! !20030611!20040831!009533998!009533998!139691877!N!HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC !15001 NE 36 ST !REDMOND !WA!98052!22230!037!06!EL MONTE !LOS ANGELES !CALIFORNIA!+000002786986!N!N!000015777302!1615!HELICOPTER ROTOR BLADES, DRIVE MECHANISMS & COMPON!A1C!OTHER AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT !1AHJ!CH-46 SEA KNIGHT !336413!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-06-11. End: 2009-01-30.

What is the historical spending pattern for helicopter rotor blades and drive mechanisms for the CH-46 Sea Knight or similar platforms?

Analyzing historical spending for CH-46 Sea Knight components requires access to detailed procurement data over the platform's service life. Generally, spending on such critical parts is driven by operational tempo, maintenance schedules, and the overall fleet size. As aircraft age, component replacement and overhaul costs tend to increase. The $13.5 million awarded here represents a specific procurement action, and a comprehensive view would involve aggregating similar contracts over several years to understand trends, identify potential cost escalations, and assess the long-term investment in maintaining these platforms. Without access to a broader dataset of past contracts for these specific parts, it's difficult to establish a definitive historical spending pattern beyond this single award.

How does the awarded amount compare to other contracts for similar helicopter components?

Comparing this $13.5 million contract to others for similar helicopter components requires a benchmark of contracts for rotor blades, drive shafts, and associated systems for comparable military helicopters. Factors influencing price include the specific helicopter model, the complexity of the components, the required performance specifications, and the contract duration. Contracts for advanced rotor systems on newer platforms might be significantly higher. Conversely, older or less complex components might be procured at lower costs. The full and open competition for this award suggests a competitive market, which should help ensure the price is aligned with market rates for these specific CH-46 components. A detailed comparison would necessitate identifying contracts with similar Product Service Codes (PSC) and contract values awarded within a relevant timeframe.

What is Honeywell International Inc.'s track record with Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) and similar contracts?

Honeywell International Inc. is a major aerospace and defense contractor with a substantial history of supplying components and systems to the U.S. military, including NAVAIR. Their track record typically involves a wide range of products, from engines and avionics to structural components. For NAVAIR, Honeywell has likely been involved in numerous contracts for various aircraft platforms. Assessing their specific track record on helicopter rotor blades and drive mechanisms would involve reviewing past performance evaluations, on-time delivery rates, and any history of contract disputes or quality issues related to similar procurements. Given their size and established presence, it's probable they have a generally positive performance history, but a deeper dive into specific contract performance data would be needed for a definitive assessment.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how is performance being measured?

Key performance indicators for a contract involving helicopter rotor blades and drive mechanisms would likely focus on critical aspects such as component reliability, durability, adherence to stringent quality standards (e.g., AS9100), on-time delivery, and compliance with technical specifications. Performance measurement would involve rigorous testing, inspection of delivered parts, and potentially flight testing data. The government, through the contracting officer and quality assurance representatives, would monitor these KPIs to ensure the components meet all safety and operational requirements. Failure to meet these KPIs could result in contract penalties, rejection of parts, or even termination, underscoring the critical nature of performance in aerospace procurements.

Are there any identified risks associated with this contract, such as technical challenges or supply chain vulnerabilities?

Risks associated with this contract could include technical challenges related to the manufacturing of complex rotor and drive components, ensuring they meet precise tolerances and material specifications. Supply chain vulnerabilities are also a concern, as the production of these parts may rely on specialized raw materials or sub-components from a limited number of suppliers. Furthermore, the long contract duration (over 5 years) introduces risks related to potential obsolescence of manufacturing equipment, changes in technology, or shifts in military requirements. The contractor's ability to manage these risks, maintain quality control, and ensure a stable supply chain will be crucial for successful contract performance.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT COMPONENTS AND ACCESSORIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Honeywell International Inc (UEI: 139691877)

Address: 15001 NE 36 ST, REDMOND, WA, 01

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2003-06-11

Current End Date: 2009-01-30

Potential End Date: 2009-01-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2013-09-13

More Contracts from Honeywell International Inc.

View all Honeywell International Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending