Naval Air Systems Command awards $150M contract for T-45TS aircraft airframes and spares to McDonnell Douglas Corporation

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $124,917,220 ($124.9M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2001-07-30

End Date: 2010-08-06

Contract Duration: 3,294 days

Daily Burn Rate: $37.9K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200111!001277!1700!AC5G1 !NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0001901C0267 !A!N!*!N! !20010730!20011015!149879157!006265946!009256819!N!MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION !J S MCDONNELL BLVD !SAINT LOUIS !MO!63166!65000!510!29!ST. LOUIS !ST. LOUIS (CITY) !MISSOURI !+000002896000!N!N!000000000000!1510!AIRCRAFT FIXED WING !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !2ATS!T-45TS !336411!*!*!1! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !D !Y!J!1!001!N!1A!A!N!F! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001!

Place of Performance

Location: SAINT LOUIS, ST. LOUIS County, MISSOURI, 63134

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $124.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: 200111!001277!1700!AC5G1 !NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0001901C0267 !A!N!*!N! !20010730!20011015!149879157!006265946!009256819!N!MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION !J S MCDONNELL BLVD !SAINT LOUIS !MO!63166!65000!510!29!ST. LOUIS !ST. L… Key points: 1. The contract value is substantial at $149,879,157, indicating a significant procurement. 2. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, now part of Boeing, was the sole awardee, raising questions about competition. 3. The risk appears moderate given the firm fixed-price contract type, but the lack of competition is a concern. 4. This spending falls within the Defense sector, specifically aircraft manufacturing.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $150 million for aircraft airframes and spares appears reasonable for a large defense procurement. Benchmarking against similar large-scale aircraft manufacturing contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded sole-source, meaning there was no competitive bidding process. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition in this sole-source award may result in taxpayers paying more than if the contract had been competitively bid.

Public Impact

Significant taxpayer funds allocated to defense procurement. Impact on the aerospace manufacturing industry and its supply chain. Potential for reduced innovation due to sole-source award. Ensuring the long-term sustainment and readiness of the T-45TS training aircraft.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competition and price discovery.
  • Potential for cost overruns if not closely managed.
  • Long contract duration (over 9 years) increases risk exposure.

Positive Signals

  • Firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty.
  • Award to a major defense contractor with established capabilities.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Defense sector, specifically within aircraft manufacturing. The total contract value of approximately $150 million is significant for this sub-sector, reflecting the complexity and scale of military aircraft production.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication of small business participation in this sole-source award. Future contracts should explore opportunities for small business involvement to foster broader economic impact.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants close oversight to ensure fair pricing and effective contract performance. Regular reviews of cost and schedule are crucial.

Related Government Programs

  • Aircraft Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Long contract duration
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Lack of small business participation

Tags

aircraft-manufacturing, department-of-defense, mo, dca, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $124.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. 200111!001277!1700!AC5G1 !NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0001901C0267 !A!N!*!N! !20010730!20011015!149879157!006265946!009256819!N!MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION !J S MCDONNELL BLVD !SAINT LOUIS !MO!63166!65000!510!29!ST. LOUIS !ST. LOUIS (CITY) !MISSOURI !+000002896000!N!N!000000000000!1510!AIRCRAFT FIXED WING !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !2ATS!T-45TS !336411!*!*!1! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A!

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $124.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2001-07-30. End: 2010-08-06.

What was the justification for awarding this contract sole-source instead of through a competitive process?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, urgent needs, or a lack of viable alternatives. Without specific documentation, it's difficult to ascertain the precise reason. However, sole-source awards generally reduce price competition, potentially leading to higher costs for the government and taxpayers compared to competitively sourced contracts.

What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source contract for aircraft manufacturing over a long duration?

Sole-source contracts for complex manufacturing over extended periods carry risks such as inflated pricing due to lack of competition, potential for scope creep, and contractor complacency. The government may also face challenges in adapting to new technologies or market changes if the sole provider doesn't innovate. Close monitoring and robust contract management are essential to mitigate these risks.

How does this contract contribute to the overall effectiveness and readiness of the T-45TS training program?

This contract is crucial for ensuring the continued availability of airframes and spares for the T-45TS, a vital training aircraft for naval aviators. By securing these components, the contract directly supports pilot training pipelines and overall fleet readiness. The effectiveness hinges on timely delivery and quality of the supplied parts.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: J S MCDONNELL BLVD, SAINT LOUIS, MO, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2001-07-30

Current End Date: 2010-08-06

Potential End Date: 2010-08-06 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2010-06-06

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending