DoD's $78M contract for ADP software and training awarded to Global Systems Technologies, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $9,896,153 ($9.9M)

Contractor: Global Systems Technologies, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-03-31

End Date: 2011-10-05

Contract Duration: 2,014 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 21

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: 200606!SS2778!1700!N00421!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIR DIV!N0017805D4347 !A!N! !Y!M801 ! !20060331!20070331!781989751!781989751!781989751!N!GLOBAL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES, I!109 FLORAL VALE BLVD !MORRISVILLE !PA!19067!57000!710!51!NORFOLK !NORFOLK (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000000433761!N!N!000000000000!U012!ADP SOFTWARE, EQUIPMENT, AND TELE TRAINING !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20090331!B!E!Y!A! !A!N!U!2!021!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!B!N!N! ! !Z! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! !1700!N00421!0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92136

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $9.9 million to GLOBAL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC for work described as: 200606!SS2778!1700!N00421!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIR DIV!N0017805D4347 !A!N! !Y!M801 ! !20060331!20070331!781989751!781989751!781989751!N!GLOBAL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES, I!109 FLORAL VALE BLVD !MORRISVILLE !PA!19067!57000!710!51!NORFOLK !NORF… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for ADP software, equipment, and tele-training services. 2. Significant funding allocated over a multi-year period. 3. Contractor has a track record with the Department of Defense. 4. Services delivered to Naval Air Warfare Center. 5. Contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, indicating potential for cost overruns. 6. Competition level was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total value of this contract is $78,198,975.10. Without specific benchmarks for ADP software, equipment, and training, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type can sometimes lead to higher costs compared to fixed-price contracts if not managed carefully. However, CPFF can be appropriate for complex or uncertain scopes of work. Further analysis would require comparing the per-unit costs of software, equipment, and training hours to market rates or similar government contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The data shows 21 bids were received, suggesting a robust competitive environment. A high number of bidders generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower prices for the government, as contractors vie for the award.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition for this contract likely resulted in a more favorable price for taxpayers compared to a sole-source or limited competition award.

Public Impact

Naval Air Warfare Center personnel benefit from enhanced ADP capabilities and training. Improved operational efficiency and technological readiness for naval air warfare operations. Potential for broader application of ADP solutions across naval aviation commands. Workforce development through specialized training programs.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology and Engineering Services sector. The IT services market is vast and competitive, with significant government spending. This contract for ADP software, equipment, and training supports a critical defense function. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other large IT service contracts awarded by the Department of Defense for similar capabilities.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate if this contract included small business set-asides or subcontracting goals. As a large contract awarded under full and open competition, it's possible that small businesses could have participated as subcontractors to the prime contractor, Global Systems Technologies, LLC. Further investigation into subcontracting reports would be needed to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Naval Air Warfare Center, with potential involvement from the Department of Defense's Inspector General. The CPFF structure necessitates close monitoring of costs and performance to ensure accountability. Transparency would be enhanced through regular reporting requirements and contract performance reviews.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, naval-air-warfare-center, it-services, software-procurement, training-services, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, large-contract, engineering-services, virginia, federal-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $9.9 million to GLOBAL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. 200606!SS2778!1700!N00421!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIR DIV!N0017805D4347 !A!N! !Y!M801 ! !20060331!20070331!781989751!781989751!781989751!N!GLOBAL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES, I!109 FLORAL VALE BLVD !MORRISVILLE !PA!19067!57000!710!51!NORFOLK !NORFOLK (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000000433761!N!N!000000000000!U012!ADP SOFTWARE, EQUIPMENT, AND TELE TRAINING !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!200

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GLOBAL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $9.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-03-31. End: 2011-10-05.

What is the track record of Global Systems Technologies, LLC with the Department of Defense?

Global Systems Technologies, LLC has been awarded multiple contracts with the Department of Defense. This specific contract, valued at over $78 million, highlights their capability to handle significant IT and training requirements for naval aviation. While this data point is substantial, a comprehensive review of their contract history would involve examining past performance reviews, any documented issues or awards, and the types of services they have provided across different DoD branches. Understanding their history can provide insights into their reliability, quality of service, and ability to manage complex projects within the defense sector.

How does the $78M contract value compare to similar ADP software and training contracts within the DoD?

Comparing the $78 million contract value requires context on the scope and duration of services. For large-scale ADP software, equipment, and comprehensive training programs, this figure is within the range of significant defense procurements. However, without specific details on the quantity of software licenses, the type and quantity of equipment, and the extent of training (e.g., number of personnel trained, duration of training), a direct benchmark is challenging. Similar contracts might range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars depending on the complexity and scale of the technological upgrade and training initiative. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee nature also suggests potential for variability.

What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract of this magnitude?

The primary risk with a CPFF contract of this magnitude ($78M) is the potential for cost overruns. While the contractor receives a fixed fee, the 'cost plus' portion means the government reimburses the contractor's allowable costs. If the contractor's costs exceed initial estimates, the government pays more. This necessitates rigorous oversight to ensure costs are reasonable, allocable, and allowable. Other risks include scope creep, where the project expands beyond its original definition, increasing costs, and potential for the contractor to prioritize profit over efficiency if cost controls are weak. Effective management and clear performance metrics are crucial to mitigate these risks.

How effective has Global Systems Technologies, LLC been in delivering ADP software, equipment, and training based on available data?

The provided data focuses on the award and financial aspects of the contract, not its performance outcomes. To assess effectiveness, one would need to review performance reports, user feedback from the Naval Air Warfare Center, and any quality assurance assessments conducted during the contract period (2006-2011). Without this information, it's impossible to definitively state how effective Global Systems Technologies, LLC was. Factors contributing to effectiveness would include on-time delivery of software and equipment, successful integration, quality of training, and whether the services met the operational needs of the naval air warfare command.

What are the historical spending patterns for ADP software, equipment, and training within the Naval Air Warfare Center?

Historical spending patterns for ADP software, equipment, and training at the Naval Air Warfare Center (NAWC) would reveal trends in technology adoption, modernization efforts, and training investments. This $78 million contract represents a significant investment in these areas during its award period. Analyzing prior NAWC contracts for similar services would show whether this expenditure is typical, an increase, or a decrease in spending. It would also indicate the preferred contract types (e.g., CPFF, fixed-price) and the typical number of bidders for such procurements, providing context for the current contract's place within the NAWC's overall procurement strategy.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAININGEDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 21

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 109 FLORAL VALE BLVD, MORRISVILLE, PA, 19067

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017805D4347

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-03-31

Current End Date: 2011-10-05

Potential End Date: 2011-10-05 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2018-03-25

More Contracts from Global Systems Technologies, LLC

View all Global Systems Technologies, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending