CACI awarded $59.7M for Global Combat Support System Marine Corps post-deployment support

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $59,707,206 ($59.7M)

Contractor: CACI, Inc. - Federal

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-01-01

End Date: 2026-12-31

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $81.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: POST DEPLOYMENT SYSTEM SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM MARINE CORPS

Place of Performance

Location: STAFFORD, STAFFORD County, VIRGINIA, 22556

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $59.7 million to CACI, INC. - FEDERAL for work described as: POST DEPLOYMENT SYSTEM SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM MARINE CORPS Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in maintaining critical Marine Corps IT infrastructure. 2. Full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive pricing environment. 3. Fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor. 4. Support services are essential for the ongoing operational readiness of the Global Combat Support System. 5. The contract duration of two years indicates a need for sustained, long-term support. 6. Contracting agency is the Department of the Navy, highlighting its role in equipping the Marine Corps.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $59.7 million over two years for post-deployment system support appears reasonable given the critical nature of the Global Combat Support System (GCSS) for the Marine Corps. Benchmarking against similar IT support contracts for large-scale enterprise systems within the Department of Defense suggests that this pricing is within expected ranges. The firm fixed-price structure further supports value by incentivizing contractor efficiency and cost control.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The agency's decision to use full and open competition suggests confidence in the market's ability to provide suitable solutions.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for cost savings through a robust bidding process, ensuring that the government receives competitive pricing for essential services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the United States Marine Corps, who will receive continuous support for their vital Global Combat Support System. Services delivered include post-deployment system support, ensuring the operational readiness and functionality of the GCSS. The geographic impact is national, supporting a critical defense system used across various Marine Corps installations. Workforce implications include the potential for employment opportunities within CACI, Inc. - Federal and its subcontractors in IT support roles.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if CACI becomes indispensable to GCSS operations.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical system support could pose risks if performance degrades.
Ensuring adequate knowledge transfer and documentation to mitigate risks associated with contractor personnel changes.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract aligns contractor incentives with government cost objectives.
Full and open competition suggests a healthy market and potential for competitive pricing.
Contract duration indicates a commitment to sustained support for a critical system.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically custom computer programming and IT support. The market for defense IT support services is substantial, driven by the ongoing need for modernization and maintenance of complex systems within agencies like the Department of Defense. Comparable spending benchmarks for enterprise IT support within large government organizations often run into tens or hundreds of millions of dollars annually, depending on the system's scope and criticality.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a set-aside requirement. However, the prime contractor, CACI, Inc. - Federal, may engage small businesses for subcontracting opportunities as part of its overall business strategy, though this is not mandated by the contract terms provided.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, which places performance and cost responsibility on the contractor. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Global Combat Support System - Marine Corps (GCSS-MC)
Defense Enterprise Systems
Marine Corps IT Modernization Programs
Department of Defense IT Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in
Reliance on single contractor for critical system
Risk of performance degradation impacting operations

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $59.7 million to CACI, INC. - FEDERAL. POST DEPLOYMENT SYSTEM SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM MARINE CORPS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CACI, INC. - FEDERAL.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $59.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-01-01. End: 2026-12-31.

What is the historical spending trend for post-deployment support of the Global Combat Support System Marine Corps?

Analyzing historical spending for the Global Combat Support System Marine Corps (GCSS-MC) is crucial for understanding cost trends and identifying potential efficiencies or escalations. While specific historical data for this exact contract line item is not provided in the current data snippet, the GCSS-MC itself has undergone significant development and sustainment phases. Previous contracts related to the sustainment and modernization of GCSS-MC would offer insights. Generally, large-scale enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems like GCSS-MC require substantial and consistent funding for post-deployment support, encompassing software maintenance, hardware upgrades, cybersecurity, and user support. Fluctuations in spending could be attributed to major system upgrades, changes in operational tempo, or shifts in technology. A comprehensive review would involve examining prior contract awards for GCSS-MC sustainment over the past 5-10 years to establish a baseline and identify any significant deviations or patterns in expenditure.

How does the awarded amount compare to similar IT support contracts for other military branches?

The awarded amount of approximately $59.7 million over two years for post-deployment system support for the Marine Corps' Global Combat Support System (GCSS-MC) can be benchmarked against similar IT support contracts in other military branches. For instance, the Army's Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems or the Air Force's logistics and readiness platforms often require comparable levels of sustainment funding. Contracts for supporting systems like the Army's Global Combat Support System-Army (GCSS-Army) or the Air Force's Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) systems can range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars annually, depending on system complexity, user base, and scope of services. The $29.85 million annual average for this GCSS-MC contract appears to be within a reasonable range for supporting a large, mission-critical enterprise system, especially considering the firm fixed-price nature which aims for cost predictability. However, a precise comparison would require detailed analysis of contract scope, duration, and specific services rendered for other branches' systems.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) expected for this post-deployment support contract?

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for a post-deployment system support contract like this are essential for ensuring the operational effectiveness and reliability of the Global Combat Support System Marine Corps (GCSS-MC). While not explicitly detailed in the provided data, typical KPIs would likely include system uptime and availability, aiming for a high percentage (e.g., 99.5% or higher) during critical operational hours. Response times for issue resolution, categorized by severity (e.g., critical, high, medium, low), would be another crucial KPI, ensuring that problems are addressed promptly to minimize disruption. Performance metrics related to the accuracy and timeliness of data processing within the system are also vital, given its role in combat support. Furthermore, KPIs might encompass user satisfaction surveys, the number of successful software patches or updates deployed, and adherence to cybersecurity protocols. The contractor's ability to meet these KPIs would directly impact the operational readiness and efficiency of the Marine Corps.

What is CACI, Inc. - Federal's track record with similar large-scale IT support contracts for the Department of Defense?

CACI, Inc. - Federal has a substantial track record of providing IT support services to the Department of Defense (DoD) and other federal agencies. They have been involved in numerous large-scale contracts encompassing a wide range of services, including enterprise IT, C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance), cybersecurity, and systems engineering. Their experience often includes supporting complex, mission-critical systems similar to the Global Combat Support System Marine Corps (GCSS-MC). Past performance reviews and contract awards databases would detail specific projects, their duration, value, and CACI's performance ratings. Generally, CACI is recognized as a major IT contractor within the defense sector, frequently winning significant contracts. Evaluating their specific performance on prior GCSS-MC related contracts, or similar ERP/logistics systems for other branches, would provide the most relevant context for assessing their capability and reliability in fulfilling this current award.

What are the potential risks associated with relying on a single contractor for critical system support?

Relying on a single contractor, such as CACI, Inc. - Federal, for critical system support like the Global Combat Support System Marine Corps (GCSS-MC) presents several potential risks. Firstly, there's the risk of 'vendor lock-in,' where the contractor develops deep, proprietary knowledge of the system, making it difficult and costly to switch providers in the future. Secondly, performance degradation is a concern; if the contractor's service quality declines, the operational impact on the Marine Corps could be significant, and finding and transitioning to a new provider under pressure can be challenging. Thirdly, personnel turnover within the contractor's team can lead to a loss of institutional knowledge and expertise, potentially impacting support continuity and quality. Finally, a sole reliance could reduce competitive pressure over time, potentially leading to less innovation or less favorable pricing in future contract renewals, although this is mitigated by the initial full and open competition.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Custom Computer Programming Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: M6785418R7600

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: CACI International Inc

Address: 14370 NEWBROOK DRIVE, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $59,707,206

Exercised Options: $59,707,206

Current Obligation: $59,707,206

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 13

Total Subaward Amount: $8,400,019

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: M6785419D7614

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline