DoD's $149.8M Surveillance Services Contract with McDonnell Douglas Corporation Raises Questions

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $34,352,444 ($34.4M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-07-14

End Date: 2007-08-31

Contract Duration: 778 days

Daily Burn Rate: $44.2K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: R&D

Official Description: 200512!200175!1700!M67854!COMMANDING GENERAL !M6785405C2082 !A!N! !N! ! !20050714!20060714!149879157!006265946!009256819!N!MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION !J S MCDONNELL BLVD !SAINT LOUIS !MO!63166!00000! !IZ!* !* !IRAQ !+000019500000!N!N!000000000000!S211!SURVEILLANCE SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541710!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !N!A!D!N!Y!1!001!N!2A!Z!W!Z!B!IZ!N!M!N! ! ! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! !1727!M67854!0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: SAINT LOUIS, ST. LOUIS County, MISSOURI, 63134

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $34.4 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: 200512!200175!1700!M67854!COMMANDING GENERAL !M6785405C2082 !A!N! !N! ! !20050714!20060714!149879157!006265946!009256819!N!MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION !J S MCDONNELL BLVD !SAINT LOUIS !MO!63166!00000! !IZ!* !* … Key points: 1. The contract awarded to McDonnell Douglas Corporation for surveillance services was not competed, raising concerns about potential overpricing and lack of market research. 2. With a total value of $149.8 million, the contract spans from July 2005 to August 2007, indicating a significant investment in defense capabilities. 3. The 'Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences' (NAICS 541710) sector suggests a focus on advanced technological solutions. 4. The absence of competition and the 'Time and Materials' contract type present a risk of cost overruns and limited accountability for performance.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's value of $149.8 million for surveillance services over two years, without clear benchmarks for similar non-competed contracts, makes a direct pricing assessment difficult. The lack of competition suggests potential for inflated costs compared to a market-driven price.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was awarded as 'NOT COMPETED' (sole-source), indicating a lack of competitive bidding. This limits price discovery and may lead to higher costs for taxpayers as there was no market pressure to offer the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source nature of this contract, valued at $149.8 million, means taxpayers may have paid more than necessary due to the absence of competitive pricing.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may have overpaid for surveillance services due to the lack of competition. The duration and value of the contract suggest a significant reliance on this specific provider for critical defense capabilities. The use of a 'Time and Materials' contract type can lead to unpredictable costs and potential for contractor inefficiencies to increase the overall price.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Time and Materials contract type
  • Potential for cost overruns

Positive Signals

  • Awarded to a major defense contractor
  • Supports critical surveillance functions

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the 'Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences' sector (NAICS 541710). Spending in this sector is crucial for technological advancement but requires rigorous oversight to ensure value for money, especially when contracts are not competed.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to McDonnell Douglas Corporation, a large aerospace manufacturer, and later acquired by The Boeing Company. There is no indication that small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors in this specific award, suggesting limited opportunities for small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT COMPETED' status and 'Time and Materials' contract type warrant close oversight to ensure the contractor is delivering services efficiently and at a reasonable cost. Accountability for performance and cost control is crucial given the significant value of the contract.

Related Government Programs

  • Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competitive bidding raises concerns about fair pricing.
  • Time and Materials contract type increases risk of cost overruns.
  • Potential for contractor inefficiencies to inflate costs.
  • Limited transparency regarding sole-source justification.
  • Significant contract value without clear performance benchmarks.

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, mo, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $34.4 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. 200512!200175!1700!M67854!COMMANDING GENERAL !M6785405C2082 !A!N! !N! ! !20050714!20060714!149879157!006265946!009256819!N!MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION !J S MCDONNELL BLVD !SAINT LOUIS !MO!63166!00000! !IZ!* !* !IRAQ !+000019500000!N!N!000000000000!S211!SURVEILLANCE SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541710!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $34.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-07-14. End: 2007-08-31.

What specific surveillance capabilities were procured under this contract, and how do they align with current defense needs?

The data indicates the contract was for 'SURVEILLANCE SERVICES' under NAICS code 541710 (Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences). While the exact capabilities are not detailed, the value and duration suggest a substantial and ongoing requirement. Understanding the specific technologies and operational support provided is key to assessing its continued relevance and effectiveness in meeting evolving defense intelligence and monitoring objectives.

What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and were alternative competitive strategies considered?

The justification for a sole-source award is not provided in the data. Typically, sole-source contracts are used when only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services. Without this justification, it's difficult to assess if competitive alternatives were truly unavailable or if the process favored a specific contractor, potentially at the expense of taxpayer value and market competition.

How was the 'Time and Materials' pricing structure managed to ensure cost-effectiveness and prevent contractor inefficiencies from inflating the final cost?

The 'Time and Materials' (T&M) contract type inherently carries a risk of cost escalation as it reimburses the contractor for direct labor hours and costs, plus a fixed fee or percentage. Effective oversight would involve rigorous monitoring of labor hours, material costs, and task completion rates. Without detailed reporting on how these elements were controlled and justified, it's challenging to ascertain if the $149.8 million represented good value or if inefficiencies were permitted to drive up the price.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPINGHOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: J S MCDONNELL BLVD, SAINT LOUIS, MO, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-07-14

Current End Date: 2007-08-31

Potential End Date: 2007-08-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-09-19

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending