Marine Corps awards $17.8M for Range Control Facility support, highlighting engineering services for Pacific installations

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,815,707 ($17.8M)

Contractor: Corps Solutions LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2023-06-13

End Date: 2026-06-22

Contract Duration: 1,105 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS PACIFIC (MCIPAC) RANGE CONTROL FACILITY (RCF) SERVICES SUPPORT

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $17.8 million to CORPS SOLUTIONS LLC for work described as: MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS PACIFIC (MCIPAC) RANGE CONTROL FACILITY (RCF) SERVICES SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract value of $17.8M for range control facility services over approximately three years. 2. Services are critical for operational readiness and safety at Marine Corps installations in the Pacific. 3. Competition was full and open, suggesting a robust bidding process. 4. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 5. The award was a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle. 6. Contractor Corps Solutions LLC is tasked with providing essential support functions.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $17.8M for range control facility services appears reasonable given the duration and scope of support required for multiple installations in the Pacific region. Benchmarking against similar contracts for facility management and operational support at large military installations suggests this pricing is within expected ranges. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government, although it may limit flexibility if unforeseen operational needs arise.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of four bidders suggests a competitive environment, which typically leads to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The agency sought a broad range of potential offerors, ensuring that the most capable and cost-effective solution was selected.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down costs through market forces and ensuring that the government receives the best value for its investment.

Public Impact

Provides essential range control and facility support services to the U.S. Marine Corps Installations Pacific (MCIPAC). Ensures the safe and effective operation of training ranges, crucial for military readiness. Supports military personnel and operations across various Marine Corps bases in the Pacific theater. Contributes to the operational infrastructure necessary for maintaining a forward-deployed military presence.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if operational requirements change significantly during the contract period.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical range operations could pose a risk if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract structure aligns incentives for contractor efficiency.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive market for these specialized services.
Delivery order structure allows for phased execution and management of services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting military operations and facility management. The market for defense-related engineering and operational support services is substantial, driven by the ongoing need for readiness and infrastructure maintenance at global military installations. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar support contracts at large military commands often range in the tens of millions of dollars annually, depending on the scope and geographic complexity.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation is a factor in the contractor's overall strategy.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Navy contracting officers and program managers within MCIPAC. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability by tying payment to deliverables. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific performance metrics and oversight activities are internal to the agency.

Related Government Programs

Marine Corps Base Operations Support
Military Range Management Services
Defense Infrastructure Support Contracts
Pacific Theater Military Operations

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues impacting critical training operations.
Geographic challenges in the Pacific theater could affect service delivery.
Reliance on contractor for specialized operational support.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $17.8 million to CORPS SOLUTIONS LLC. MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS PACIFIC (MCIPAC) RANGE CONTROL FACILITY (RCF) SERVICES SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CORPS SOLUTIONS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-06-13. End: 2026-06-22.

What is the track record of Corps Solutions LLC in providing similar range control facility services to the Department of Defense?

A review of publicly available contract data indicates that Corps Solutions LLC has a history of performing various support services for the Department of Defense. While specific details on their experience with 'Range Control Facility Services' are not immediately apparent from this single award, their past performance on other contracts would be a key factor in the government's source selection process. Agencies typically evaluate a contractor's past performance, including their ability to meet schedule, cost, and technical requirements, when making award decisions. Further investigation into their contract history, including any performance evaluations or past disputes, would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their capabilities and reliability in this specialized area.

How does the $17.8M contract value compare to historical spending on similar services by MCIPAC or other Marine Corps installations?

The $17.8 million contract value for approximately three years of Range Control Facility (RCF) Services Support for Marine Corps Installations Pacific (MCIPAC) appears to be within a reasonable range for supporting complex operational facilities in a high-cost region like the Pacific. Without specific historical data for MCIPAC's RCF services, direct comparison is difficult. However, similar contracts for base operations support, facility management, and specialized technical services at large military installations can often run into the tens of millions of dollars over similar periods. Factors such as the number of ranges managed, the complexity of the operational requirements, and the geographic dispersion of facilities would influence the overall cost. The firm fixed-price nature suggests a defined scope, which aids in cost predictability.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are likely in place?

Primary risks for this contract include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor, leading to disruptions in range operations and impacting training readiness. Another risk is the potential for cost overruns if the firm fixed-price contract does not adequately account for unforeseen operational challenges or scope changes, although the FFP structure aims to place this risk on the contractor. Geopolitical or environmental factors in the Pacific could also pose risks to service delivery. Mitigation strategies likely include robust contract oversight by the government, clear performance standards and metrics, regular performance reviews, and contingency planning by both the government and the contractor. The full and open competition also mitigates risk by ensuring a competitive pool of capable providers.

How effective is the firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type in ensuring value for money for range control facility services?

The Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type is generally considered effective in ensuring value for money for services with a well-defined scope, such as range control facility support. Under an FFP contract, the contractor assumes the majority of the cost risk, incentivizing them to manage resources efficiently and control costs to maximize profit. This structure provides the government with cost certainty, as the price is fixed regardless of the contractor's actual costs. For services like range control, where operational requirements can be clearly articulated, FFP encourages the contractor to deliver the specified services at the agreed-upon price. However, if the scope is not precisely defined or if significant unforeseen changes occur, the government might face challenges in obtaining additional services without a contract modification, potentially leading to higher costs or delays.

What are the implications of awarding this contract as a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle?

Awarding this contract as a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle, such as a Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract, offers several advantages. It allows the government to leverage pre-negotiated terms, conditions, and potentially pricing from the parent contract, streamlining the acquisition process. This approach can also foster competition among awardees of the parent contract, as seen with the four bidders in this instance. For taxpayers, it can lead to faster procurement cycles and potentially better pricing due to established relationships and competition within the vehicle. However, it also means that the specific terms and pricing for this delivery order are subject to the framework of the overarching contract, which may have been established some time ago.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: M6740023R3000

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 233 GARRISONVILLE RD, STAFFORD, VA, 22554

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $35,688,332

Exercised Options: $17,815,707

Current Obligation: $17,815,707

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017819D7416

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline