Vertex Aerospace LLC awarded $20M contract for integrator ROR services by the Department of the Navy

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,000,000 ($20.0M)

Contractor: Vertex Aerospace LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-06-30

End Date: 2026-05-31

Contract Duration: 335 days

Daily Burn Rate: $59.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: INTEGRATOR ROR SERVICE -

Place of Performance

Location: MADISON, MADISON County, MISSISSIPPI, 39110

State: Mississippi Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $20.0 million to VERTEX AEROSPACE LLC for work described as: INTEGRATOR ROR SERVICE - Key points: 1. Contract value of $20 million over approximately one year suggests a significant but not exceptionally large engagement. 2. The contract is for 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services,' indicating a broad scope of support. 3. Awarded under full and open competition, this suggests a competitive process was utilized. 4. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs by establishing a set price for the services. 5. The delivery order structure implies flexibility in how services are called off by the agency. 6. The contract duration of 335 days is standard for this type of service engagement.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $20 million for approximately one year of integrator ROR services appears reasonable given the broad category of 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services.' Without specific details on the services provided, direct comparison is challenging. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract suggests an effort to ensure value for money by capping costs. Benchmarking against similar broad technical support contracts would provide further insight into whether this represents a competitive price point.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. This typically leads to a more robust price discovery process as multiple companies vie for the contract. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the open competition suggests a healthy level of market interest and potential for competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the competitive nature of this award, as it is expected to drive down costs and ensure the government receives the best possible value for its investment in integrator ROR services.

Public Impact

The Department of the Navy benefits from specialized integrator ROR services, likely enhancing operational efficiency or technical capabilities. The services delivered are broadly categorized as professional, scientific, and technical, supporting complex defense operations. The contract is geographically focused on Mississippi, potentially impacting the local economy and workforce in that region. The contract may support a specialized technical workforce, requiring specific skills in integration and ROR services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Scope ambiguity: 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' is a broad category, making it difficult to assess the precise nature and value of the services without further detail.
Performance metrics: The provided data lacks specific performance metrics or key performance indicators (KPIs) to evaluate the effectiveness of the integrator ROR services.
Contract modifications: Information on potential contract modifications or change orders is not available, which could impact the final cost and scope.
Dependency on Vertex Aerospace: The government's reliance on a single contractor for these specific services could pose a risk if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition: The award process suggests a competitive market for these services, potentially leading to better pricing and innovation.
Fixed-price contract: This contract type provides cost certainty for the government, mitigating the risk of cost overruns.
Delivery order structure: Allows the Navy to procure services as needed, providing flexibility and potentially avoiding unnecessary expenditure.
Experienced contractor: Vertex Aerospace LLC's involvement suggests a level of established capability in providing relevant services.

Sector Analysis

The defense sector relies heavily on specialized technical services for maintaining and enhancing complex systems. Integrator ROR (likely referring to Readiness, Operations, and Readiness or a similar acronym) services fall within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services market, which is a significant segment of federal contracting. This contract fits within the Department of Defense's ongoing need for support services that ensure the operational effectiveness of its assets. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar broad technical support contracts within the DoD can range widely depending on the specific nature of the services and the duration.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary set-aside consideration for this contract. This suggests that the primary award was made to a large business, Vertex Aerospace LLC. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether Vertex Aerospace intends to subcontract portions of this work to smaller firms, which is not detailed in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the Department of the Navy. Accountability measures are inherent in the fixed-price contract terms, requiring Vertex Aerospace LLC to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of contract awards, though detailed performance data may not always be publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Support Services
Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) Technical Services
Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) Support Contracts
Professional and Technical Services - Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS)
Department of Defense Information Analysis Centers (IACs)

Risk Flags

Scope Ambiguity
Performance Measurement Difficulty
Contractor Dependency

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $20.0 million to VERTEX AEROSPACE LLC. INTEGRATOR ROR SERVICE -

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is VERTEX AEROSPACE LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-06-30. End: 2026-05-31.

What specific 'ROR' services does Vertex Aerospace LLC provide under this contract, and how do they align with the 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' NAICS code?

The provided data categorizes this contract under NAICS code 541990, 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services.' This is a broad category encompassing a wide array of services not elsewhere classified. 'ROR' is not a standard government acronym and likely refers to a specific internal program or service designation within the Department of the Navy, such as Readiness, Operations, and Readiness, or a similar operational support function. Vertex Aerospace LLC's role would involve providing the professional, scientific, or technical expertise necessary to support these specific ROR functions. This could include analysis, consulting, system integration, technical support, or program management related to the Navy's operational readiness and efficiency. Without further details from the contract statement of work, the precise nature of these services remains general.

How does the $20 million contract value compare to historical spending on similar integrator ROR services by the Department of the Navy?

Direct historical spending comparisons for 'integrator ROR services' are difficult without a precise definition of ROR and the specific services rendered. However, the $20 million award for a contract spanning approximately 335 days (just under a year) suggests a substantial but not exceptionally large contract. The Department of the Navy procures a vast array of professional, scientific, and technical services annually, often in the hundreds of millions or billions of dollars across various categories. To benchmark this specific contract, one would need to identify comparable contracts awarded under NAICS 541990 or similar codes for operational support and technical integration services to defense agencies. The fixed-price nature and the competitive award process are positive indicators for value, but a true comparison would require analyzing the scope of work and pricing of similar past awards.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate Vertex Aerospace LLC's performance under this contract?

The provided summary data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or metrics for evaluating Vertex Aerospace LLC's performance. Typically, such metrics are detailed within the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS). For a contract involving integrator ROR services, potential KPIs could include on-time delivery of reports or analyses, successful integration of systems, achievement of operational readiness targets, adherence to technical specifications, or client satisfaction ratings. The contracting officer's representative (COR) would be responsible for monitoring performance against these agreed-upon metrics. The absence of this information in the summary suggests it is a detail found within the full contract documentation.

What is the track record of Vertex Aerospace LLC in performing similar integrator ROR services for the Department of the Navy or other federal agencies?

Vertex Aerospace LLC is a known entity in the aerospace and defense sector, often involved in aircraft maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO), as well as providing aviation support services. While the specific 'ROR' services mentioned here might be a new designation or a specific niche, the company's general experience in supporting complex defense systems and operations suggests a foundational capability. To assess their track record for this specific type of contract, one would need to examine their past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) and review other contracts they have held with the Department of the Navy and other federal agencies. Their history with fixed-price contracts and full and open competition would also be relevant indicators of their ability to manage such an engagement effectively.

Given the 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' classification, what are the potential risks associated with the scope and execution of this contract?

The primary risk associated with contracts classified under 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' (NAICS 541990) is scope ambiguity. This broad classification means the exact nature of the services can be less defined than in more specific categories, potentially leading to misunderstandings, scope creep, or disputes between the contractor and the government. For this 'integrator ROR service' contract, risks could include unclear deliverables, difficulty in measuring performance, and challenges in ensuring the services truly meet the intended operational readiness or integration goals. Additionally, reliance on a single contractor, even one selected through competition, carries inherent risks if performance falters or if the contractor faces financial or operational difficulties. The fixed-price nature mitigates cost overrun risks but could incentivize the contractor to minimize effort if the scope is not tightly managed.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: M6700420R0007

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 555 INDUSTRIAL DR S, MADISON, MS, 39110

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $20,000,000

Exercised Options: $20,000,000

Current Obligation: $20,000,000

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 4

Total Subaward Amount: $257,360

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: M6700421D0002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline