DoD Awards Raytheon $175.7M for Policy Review/Development Services, Ending 2007

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,566,686 ($17.6M)

Contractor: Raytheon Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-11-14

End Date: 2007-09-30

Contract Duration: 685 days

Daily Burn Rate: $25.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200602!009329!1700!M67004!COMMANDER !GS10F0229L !C!N! !N!M6700406F0231! !20051114!20060930!931871438!112820840!001339159!N!RAYTHEON TECHNICAL SERVICES CO!12160 SUNRISE VALLEY DRIVE!RESTON !VA!20191!66672!059!51!RESTON !FAIRFAX !VIRGINIA !+000002400000!N!N!000000000000!R406!POLICY REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541614!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !C!N! ! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!1727!M98850!0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: BURLINGTON, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01803

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $17.6 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY for work described as: 200602!009329!1700!M67004!COMMANDER !GS10F0229L !C!N! !N!M6700406F0231! !20051114!20060930!931871438!112820840!001339159!N!RAYTHEON TECHNICAL SERVICES CO!12160 SUNRISE VALLEY DRIVE!RESTON !VA!20191!66672!059!51!RESTON !FAIR… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Raytheon Technical Services Co. for policy review and development. 2. The contract value is $175.7 million over its duration. 3. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The sector is professional services, specifically consulting. 5. The contract duration is approximately 685 days.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $175.7 million for policy review and development services over roughly two years appears within a reasonable range for complex government consulting. Benchmarking against similar large-scale policy development contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes price discovery and can lead to more competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayers likely received a fair price for the services rendered, though the exact savings are not quantifiable without a baseline.

Public Impact

Policy review and development services are critical for government operations and strategic planning. The award to a major contractor like Raytheon indicates a significant undertaking. The duration of the contract suggests ongoing support and analysis are required. Transparency in the bidding process (full and open) is a positive for public trust.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics or outcomes in the provided data.
Potential for scope creep in policy development contracts.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical policy functions.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Contract value is clearly defined.
Contract duration is specified.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically consulting. Government spending in this area is substantial, supporting various agencies in analysis, strategy, and program development.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific set-asides or subcontracting requirements for small businesses on this contract. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved.

Oversight & Accountability

Standard government oversight processes would apply to this contract. The Department of Defense and Department of the Navy are responsible for ensuring contract compliance and performance.

Related Government Programs

Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics.
Potential for cost overruns if scope is not tightly managed.
Dependence on contractor expertise.
Limited insight into the specific policy outcomes achieved.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $17.6 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY. 200602!009329!1700!M67004!COMMANDER !GS10F0229L !C!N! !N!M6700406F0231! !20051114!20060930!931871438!112820840!001339159!N!RAYTHEON TECHNICAL SERVICES CO!12160 SUNRISE VALLEY DRIVE!RESTON !VA!20191!66672!059!51!RESTON !FAIRFAX !VIRGINIA !+000002400000!N!N!000000000000!R406!POLICY REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541614!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RAYTHEON COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-11-14. End: 2007-09-30.

What specific policy areas were covered by this contract, and what was the intended impact of the review and development services?

The provided data identifies the service as 'POLICY REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES' (NAICS 541614) but does not specify the policy domains. These services likely aimed to analyze existing policies, identify areas for improvement, and develop new policy frameworks to support the Department of the Navy's strategic objectives or operational needs.

How did the final contract price compare to initial estimates or bids received during the full and open competition?

The data presents the awarded contract value ($175.7 million) but does not include information on initial estimates or the range of bids submitted. A full and open competition implies multiple bids were evaluated, and the awarded price reflects the government's assessment of the best value, considering both cost and technical factors.

What mechanisms were in place to measure the effectiveness and success of Raytheon's policy review and development services?

The provided data lacks details on performance metrics or key performance indicators (KPIs) used to assess the effectiveness of the services. Typically, such contracts would include deliverables, review milestones, and potentially user feedback or impact assessments to gauge success.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED (NO)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 141 SPRING ST, LEXINGTON, MA, 05

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS10F0229L

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline