Department of the Navy awards $16.3M contract for Child and Youth Services, with 2 bidders

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,333,001 ($16.3M)

Contractor: J & E Associates Incorporated

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-09-28

End Date: 2009-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,098 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)

Sector: Other

Official Description: CAMP PENDLETON/SDIEGO/MIRAMAR/BRIDGEPORT

Place of Performance

Location: QUANTICO, PRINCE WILLIAM County, VIRGINIA, 22134

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $16.3 million to J & E ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED for work described as: CAMP PENDLETON/SDIEGO/MIRAMAR/BRIDGEPORT Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, indicating a broad market search. 2. The contract duration of approximately three years suggests a need for sustained services. 3. The award was made to J & E ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED, a contractor with a presence in Virginia. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 624110 points to a focus on child and youth services. 5. The contract's value of $16.3 million places it in the mid-tier range for federal service contracts. 6. The presence of two bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific requirement.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $16.3 million for approximately three years of child and youth services appears to be within a reasonable range for such specialized support. Benchmarking against similar contracts for youth services at military installations would provide a clearer picture of value for money. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns, a definitive assessment of cost-effectiveness is challenging. However, the competition level suggests that pricing was likely scrutinized.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. Two bids were received, indicating a moderate level of interest and competition for this requirement. While two bidders is better than a sole-source award, a higher number of competitors could potentially drive prices down further and offer a wider range of solutions.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition, despite receiving only two bids, suggests that taxpayers benefited from a structured bidding process that aimed to secure competitive pricing for essential child and youth services.

Public Impact

Children and youth residing at or near Camp Pendleton, San Diego, Miramar, and Bridgeport military installations are the primary beneficiaries. The contract delivers essential child and youth services, likely encompassing programs, care, and support activities. The geographic impact is concentrated on military families stationed at these specific bases. The contract supports the families of service members, contributing to military readiness and personnel retention by providing reliable childcare and youth programs.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition (2 bidders) may have restricted price discovery.
Contract duration of approximately three years could lead to complacency if not actively managed.
Performance metrics and quality assurance details are not readily available for assessment.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, maximizing potential bidder pool.
Contract addresses a critical need for military family support.
Contractor J & E ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED has secured a federal award, indicating some level of capability.

Sector Analysis

The federal spending on child and youth services falls under the broader social assistance sector. This contract specifically addresses the needs of military families, a niche within social services. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other Department of Defense contracts for family support programs or similar services provided to civilian populations by government agencies. The market for these services is often characterized by specialized providers focused on specific demographics or needs.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small businesses were not specifically set aside for this contract, as the 'sb' field is false. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans or their impact on the small business ecosystem. Without explicit set-aside goals or subcontracting requirements, the direct impact on small businesses is unclear, though they may have participated as subcontractors to the prime contractor.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of the Navy. Accountability measures would be outlined in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS, which provide basic information on the award. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Military Family Support Programs
Child Care Services
Youth Development Programs
Department of Defense Family Programs
Naval Support Activities

Risk Flags

Limited competition
Potential for performance issues
Cost management risks

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $16.3 million to J & E ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED. CAMP PENDLETON/SDIEGO/MIRAMAR/BRIDGEPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is J & E ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-09-28. End: 2009-09-30.

What is the track record of J & E ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED with federal contracts, particularly in child and youth services?

Information regarding the specific track record of J & E ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED with federal contracts, especially within the child and youth services domain, is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive analysis would require examining their past performance on similar contracts, including client satisfaction, adherence to schedules, and budget management. Reviewing contract databases and past performance evaluations would be necessary to assess their reliability and expertise in delivering these critical services. Without this historical data, it is difficult to definitively gauge their capabilities and past success.

How does the $16.3 million contract value compare to similar child and youth services contracts awarded by the Department of Defense?

The $16.3 million contract value for approximately three years of child and youth services at multiple military installations represents a significant investment. To benchmark this value effectively, it would be necessary to compare it against other Department of Defense (DoD) contracts for similar services, considering factors such as the number of children served, the scope of services provided (e.g., full-day care, after-school programs, specialized support), and the geographic location. Contracts for youth programs at large military bases can range from a few million to tens of millions of dollars annually, depending on the scale of operations. This award appears to be within a typical range for supporting multiple installations, but a detailed comparison with contracts of similar scope and duration would be needed for a precise value-for-money assessment.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Primary risks associated with this contract could include potential performance issues by the contractor, such as failure to meet service quality standards or staffing shortages, which could impact military families. Another risk is cost overruns if the scope of work expands or unforeseen challenges arise. Additionally, a limited number of bidders (two) might suggest potential market concentration or barriers to entry, which could affect future competition and pricing. Mitigation strategies would typically involve robust contract oversight, clear performance metrics, regular performance reviews, and contingency planning. The Department of the Navy's contracting and program management teams are responsible for monitoring contractor performance and addressing any issues that arise to ensure the continuity and quality of child and youth services.

What is the expected effectiveness of the child and youth services provided under this contract in supporting military families?

The expected effectiveness of these services hinges on the contractor's ability to deliver high-quality, reliable, and age-appropriate programs that meet the needs of military children and youth. Effective services contribute significantly to military family readiness by providing a stable and supportive environment for children, allowing service members to focus on their duties. Positive outcomes would include improved child development, reduced stress for parents, and enhanced morale within the military community. The contract's success will be measured by the contractor's adherence to service level agreements, positive feedback from families, and the overall contribution to the well-being of the military community at the specified installations.

How has federal spending on child and youth services for military families evolved over the past five years?

Analyzing the evolution of federal spending on child and youth services for military families over the past five years would require access to historical spending data across various branches of the Department of Defense and potentially other agencies like the Department of Health and Human Services. Generally, there has been a sustained focus on supporting military families, with consistent funding allocated to programs that enhance quality of life, including childcare and youth activities. Spending levels can fluctuate based on military personnel levels, base closures or expansions, and shifts in government priorities or budget allocations. A detailed trend analysis would reveal any significant increases or decreases in investment in these critical support services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › Individual and Family Services › Child and Youth Services

Product/Service Code: SOCIAL SERVICES › SOCIAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: M0026405R0024

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 8757 GEORGIA AVE STE 400, SILVER SPRING, MD, 08

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,145,614

Exercised Options: $16,373,805

Current Obligation: $16,333,001

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline