DoD's $60.6M Environmental Consulting Contract Awarded to Potomac Hudson Engineering

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,301,717 ($10.3M)

Contractor: Potomac-Hudson Engineering Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-12-10

End Date: 2010-05-30

Contract Duration: 1,997 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200505!005165!1700!M00264!OIC DIRECT SUPPORT STOCK CONTROL!GS10F0045K !C!N! !N!M0026405F0039! !20041210!20051130!606471688!606471688!606471688!N!POTOMAC HUDSON ENGINEERING, IN!7830 OLD GEORGETOWN ROAD !BETHESDA !MD!20814!07125!031!24!BETHESDA !MONTGOMERY !MARYLAND !+000001742299!N!N!000000000000!B510!ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES & ASSESSMENTS !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541620!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!B!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !1727!M00088!0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: QUANTICO, PRINCE WILLIAM County, VIRGINIA, 22134

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.3 million to POTOMAC-HUDSON ENGINEERING INC for work described as: 200505!005165!1700!M00264!OIC DIRECT SUPPORT STOCK CONTROL!GS10F0045K !C!N! !N!M0026405F0039! !20041210!20051130!606471688!606471688!606471688!N!POTOMAC HUDSON ENGINEERING, IN!7830 OLD GEORGETOWN ROAD !BETHESDA !MD!20814!07125!031!24!BETHESDA !MONT… Key points: 1. The Department of Defense awarded a significant contract for environmental consulting services. 2. Potomac Hudson Engineering Inc. secured the contract, indicating strong performance or competitive advantage. 3. The contract duration of nearly 20 years suggests a long-term need for these services. 4. The sector is Environmental Consulting Services, a niche but critical area for government operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $60.6M over nearly 20 years averages around $3M annually. Benchmarking this against similar environmental consulting contracts is difficult without more granular data on the specific services provided.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. However, the long duration might have allowed for price escalation over time.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers funded a long-term contract for environmental consulting, with the value spread over two decades. The competitive award aims to ensure reasonable pricing.

Public Impact

Environmental assessments and consulting are crucial for regulatory compliance and risk management for federal agencies. The long contract term implies a sustained need for environmental services, potentially related to ongoing projects or base operations. The significant dollar amount highlights the importance and cost associated with maintaining environmental standards.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Long contract duration (nearly 20 years) may lead to price increases over time.
  • Lack of specific service details makes it hard to assess true value for money.
  • Potential for scope creep over such an extended period.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition.
  • Contract addresses critical environmental compliance needs.
  • Established vendor with a long-term relationship.

Sector Analysis

Environmental Consulting Services (NAICS 541620) are essential for government agencies to manage environmental impact, comply with regulations, and conduct site assessments. Spending in this sector can vary based on infrastructure projects and environmental initiatives.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. The contract was awarded to Potomac Hudson Engineering, Inc., and further analysis would be needed to determine their small business status or if subcontracting opportunities exist.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a degree of oversight in the procurement process. However, the long duration necessitates ongoing monitoring to ensure performance and cost control.

Related Government Programs

  • Environmental Consulting Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Long contract duration may lead to price inflation.
  • Time and Materials contract type can be susceptible to cost overruns.
  • Lack of specific service details hinders granular value assessment.
  • Potential for scope creep over an extended period.

Tags

environmental-consulting-services, department-of-defense, va, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.3 million to POTOMAC-HUDSON ENGINEERING INC. 200505!005165!1700!M00264!OIC DIRECT SUPPORT STOCK CONTROL!GS10F0045K !C!N! !N!M0026405F0039! !20041210!20051130!606471688!606471688!606471688!N!POTOMAC HUDSON ENGINEERING, IN!7830 OLD GEORGETOWN ROAD !BETHESDA !MD!20814!07125!031!24!BETHESDA !MONTGOMERY !MARYLAND !+000001742299!N!N!000000000000!B510!ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES & ASSESSMENTS !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541620!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is POTOMAC-HUDSON ENGINEERING INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-12-10. End: 2010-05-30.

What specific environmental services were included in this contract, and how do they align with the agency's evolving needs over nearly two decades?

The contract specifies 'Environmental Studies & Assessments' and 'Services' under NAICS code 541620. Over a 20-year period, the agency's environmental needs likely evolved due to new regulations, changing infrastructure, and updated scientific understanding. Detailed task orders and performance reviews would be necessary to confirm alignment and value.

Given the long duration, what mechanisms were in place to manage potential cost overruns or price escalations for this Time and Materials contract?

Time and Materials contracts inherently carry a risk of cost overruns. While awarded competitively, the nearly 20-year term suggests the contract likely included provisions for periodic rate reviews or adjustments based on economic factors. However, without specific contract clauses, it's difficult to assess the effectiveness of cost control measures.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value for taxpayers over the contract's extensive lifespan?

Full and open competition is designed to foster a competitive environment, theoretically leading to better pricing. However, the long duration of this contract (2004-2010, with a potential extension implied by the data's end date) means the initial competitive advantage might have diminished over time. Ongoing performance and cost reviews are crucial to ensure continued value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesEnvironmental Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS, NOT R&DSPECIAL STUDIES - NOT R and D

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4833 RUGBY AVE STE 100, BETHESDA, MD, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS10F0045K

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2004-12-10

Current End Date: 2010-05-30

Potential End Date: 2010-05-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2013-04-09

More Contracts from Potomac-Hudson Engineering Inc

View all Potomac-Hudson Engineering Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending